Does anybody else have any data on Audette test repeatability?
There’s no reason to repeat a test that yields the best long range load for your rifle. Why the hell would you want to continue searching for a long range load with minimal vertical after the test produces one?
The “repeatability” is verified every time you shoot practice, a match, or kill something at long range.
I guess if you’re obsessed with testing and don’t mind wasting useful barrel life on it instead of actually shooting a good long range load for reelz, knock yourself out.
You are so far out of your league trying to debate this with Jordan.
You’re a phhuuuukking hack who managed to win a few matches a decade ago using someone else’s work that you “improved” and think that means something. Jordan literally has a masters degree in this type of science and makes a good living applying same.
His understanding of physics and ballistics is far beyond anything your fat spaghetti head could ever comprehend.
Sure Audette’s work but there are other ways that work just as well as may top shooters in multiple disciplines have shown.
Audette, Satterlee, OCW all work fine and neither is better then the other but none are end all be alls as most guys run them once and never again. Shooting a test once as you keep stating could be a fluke and is therefor statistically irrelevant. Doing it 2+ times starts to show patterns. Any serious shooter will do more than one data set to form an actual conclusion.
