Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
I’m a bully for asking for receipts?

Again, lol

Sorry to trigger you. 😂😂😂
You can ask all you want, but I’m not asking for a refund so I see no reason to show you any receipts. I’m not going to show you my wife’s lingerie, either, so don’t bother asking. LOL.

Don’t play dumb. You love holding hands with your partner in crime and demanding pics to try and gaslight and discredit those you don’t like. It’s not hard to see right through the passive aggression.


^^^The very Definition of passive aggression ^^^^



The things I like about Jordan's posts are that he's obviously very knowledgeable, willing to share his knowledge withouot blowing his own horn, and I don't think I've ever seen him go after another poster or denigrate another poster unless like here, someone really provokes him.


Just that.

Jordan hasn’t shared any knowledge about load development on this forum whatsoever that I have seen. If you think “knowledgeable” is trying to discredit a load development method that has been used successfully for decades based on probability and statistics….

I didn't see him try to discredit your pet method. I saw him ask about repeatability, which is basic to probability and statistics.


I addressed that earlier. The “repeatability” is the proven load



Originally Posted by kingston
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Jordan hasn’t shared any knowledge about load development on this forum whatsoever that I have seen. If you think “knowledgeable” is trying to discredit a load development method that has been used successfully for decades based on probability and statistics….

Sample sizes of three make for very poor probabilities and statistics.


See above

Originally Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.