Wow the fact I provided footnotes indicates
it's not my work. But you had to come and state
the obvious..a gotcha fail.
You "provided" footnotes which you clearly hadn't read. Moreover, you clearly don't know
how to footnote.
A case in point: the footnote you cite as "ASP-18", is a reference to a paper which goes to a part of the article you hadn't stolen. The paper is properly cited as:
A randomized controlled trial of fresh frozen plasma for treating venom induced consumption coagulopathy in cases of Australian snakebite (ASP-18). Isbister, G.K., et al. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 11(7), 1310-1318.
It has nothing to do with any of what you
said lifted, unattributed, from someone else's work. This would have been obvious if you knew what you were talking about.
