Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by TheLastLemming76
Originally Posted by Roddy1993
we simply cannot rid the world of dangerous things and we certainly should not impose our will on others. when there is a large enough consensus it may get voted in, that act does not make it right. when there are two large enough groups that disagree then we have war. if argument is all that exists among a topic then argue you must. still doesn't mean either side is right. I myself do not have a dog in this debate hahahaha get it, DOG in this fight!!!! I amaze myself every day. carry on Karens and Boomers
Pretty well said.

I’m not sure how you would ban them anyhow. All a breeder would have to do is outcross to something similar and then it would be a mutt or a new designer dog rather than a pit.

You could ban everything that looked similar to a pit English Bulldogs included but then breed for a similar temperament in something that looked completely different, an aggressive traditional working Doberman ect.
You are right, a ban would not work. The best thing is how we do it here. Make it unlawful for a dog to run at large.

Most people have no idea how many calls come in to the sheriff about dogs. When I was at the dispatch center writing reports I just told the complainers to catch him and deliver him to the pound and if he tried to bite kill him. The sheriff's personnel liked to turn animal complaints over to me such as bad dogs and starving horses.
Spot on.

It comes down to individual freedom and personal responsibility. Nothing short of banning every dog over 25 pounds or so would keep kids safe and not entirely then. If someone’s dog is running wild deal with the individual dog and owner.