My point is I was making an attempt at sarcasm.
"Sarcasm is the rhetorical device of using a characterization of something or someone in order to express contempt."
I just wasn't clear enough. This whole thread is laced with nothing but anecdotal evidence. When they are ready to post real, comparative numbers, on which I can run inferential statistics, then their opinion is just like mine, an opinion. Nothing in this thread would lead an unbiased researcher to any conclusion regarding Glock pistols.
