I'm sorry, but I still don't see how those comments can be expanded into B.R. being "anti 2nd Amendment." He's talking about magazines, not guns. And his opinion about how many rounds a civilian needs are just that: his opinions.
On the same kind of overly critical thinking, does a company owner who says "real guns are blued steel and walnut" become anti 2nd Amendment? It is, after all, an opinion that would limit the kinds of guns his company made.
