Originally Posted by David_Walter
Originally Posted by jimmyp
Originally Posted by David_Walter
Originally Posted by fluffy
I would think that shooting an elk at 600 yds with a 243 would be akin to shooting one at 100 yards with a 22 lr.
could be done,but why would you?
seems someone who can afford to shoot tens and tens of elk should be able to afford a more suitable rifle.


Again, he's killed scores, you've killed what?

The rifle that you shoot well with a bullet that kills cleanly is the appropriate rifle. No?


You are arguing with wish and fancy. What I read is that so far the only one who has shot an animal with a .243 at distance and who has posted here in this discussion is John Burns. Know nothing arm chair quarterbacks can always find fault in someone's success and for good reason, they could never make that shot with any caliber rifle under any circumstance.


zackly



Does he speak for himself or do you guys just have mancrushes and can't resist?