Originally Posted by fluffy
Originally Posted by David_Walter
Originally Posted by fluffy
I would think that shooting an elk at 600 yds with a 243 would be akin to shooting one at 100 yards with a 22 lr.
could be done,but why would you?
seems someone who can afford to shoot tens and tens of elk should be able to afford a more suitable rifle.


Again, he's killed scores, you've killed what?

The rifle that you shoot well with a bullet that kills cleanly is the appropriate rifle. No?



your problem is obvious,even to an idiot like me.



Obvious that actual experience and kills in the field trumps BS about perceived advantages based on bullet diameter?


“Live free or die. Death is not the worst of evils.” - General John Stark.