Hey guys, I spoke with Leupold, and they've spoken with me. I’m excited to announce that they want to respond to everything that's been discussed here in the threads, by hosting a Special-Edition Leupold Live Q&A, that is exclusively available to the members here at the 'Fire. Leupold company representatives will address the concerns that they’ve" heard" voiced on the threads here, and the live video platform will allow further questions to be submitted by all of you. This special event will begin at 5pm PST on Tuesday, July 9.
Further details will be posted, including how to launch the stream on your computer or mobile device, earlier on Tuesday.
Please tune in and let's voice the concerns and issues and work with them in this great interactive session on Tuesday.
Have a great day.
Please follow me on instagram at gr8fuldoug1
Thank you for your continued support. If there is anything else that I can assist you with please let me know. Doug Camera Land 720 Old Bethpage Road Old Bethpage, NY 11804 516-217-1000 Please visit our web site @ www.cameralandny.com Cameras,Binoculars, Spotting Scopes, Rifle Scopes | Camera Land NY Long Islands Largest Camera and Sports Optics Superstore[color:#CC0000][/color]
That's on my lodges stated meeting night and I have to be there at 6:30 P.M. But I'll try and catch the beginning. I really have no qualms with Leupold. I own a bunch of their products and I'm very happy with them having never experienced some of the grief I've seen on here. To me they're as clear as my eyes can benefit from, they're sturdy, and they're light. I don't do any knob twisting in the field so tracking isn't that big a deal for me. But I read that Leupold had strengthened the erector on the new VX-3is which was done to improve tracking. I zeroed 3 of them and they tracked as well as any scope I've seen.
What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
Who is moderating the session? Who determines what questions are answered? If Leupold is in charge of the whole exchange and not a neutral third party, it may prove difficult to get answers for the tough questions.
We should try and come together as a community with a short list of questions that we would really like answered, otherwise there’s likely to be a lot of random crap and/or softball questions thrown out there which may detract from the session. Either vote on a set of questions (possibly set up a poll on this forum), or appoint someone or a couple someones who have their ducks in a row to act as our voice. Probably not enough consensus here to get anything like what I just wrote accomplished, but it’s worth a shot.
Who is moderating the session? Who determines what questions are answered? If Leupold is in charge of the whole exchange and not a neutral third party, it may prove difficult to get answers for the tough questions.
We should try and come together as a community with a short list of questions that we would really like answered, otherwise there’s likely to be a lot of random crap and/or softball questions thrown out there which may detract from the session. Either vote on a set of questions (possibly set up a poll on this forum), or appoint someone or a couple someones who have their ducks in a row to act as our voice. Probably not enough consensus here to get anything like what I just wrote accomplished, but it’s worth a shot.
Great suggestion. Other wise the Leupold haters will just turn it into a cluster___.
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Who is moderating the session? Who determines what questions are answered? If Leupold is in charge of the whole exchange and not a neutral third party, it may prove difficult to get answers for the tough questions.
We should try and come together as a community with a short list of questions that we would really like answered, otherwise there’s likely to be a lot of random crap and/or softball questions thrown out there which may detract from the session. Either vote on a set of questions (possibly set up a poll on this forum), or appoint someone or a couple someones who have their ducks in a row to act as our voice. Probably not enough consensus here to get anything like what I just wrote accomplished, but it’s worth a shot.
This is an excellent suggestion. At the very least it will keep our question on point being asked by a pre-selected few Fire members.
Formidilosus Jordan EHG
Could be a good start...😎
Curiosity Killed the Cat & The Prairie Dog “Molon Labe”
Who is moderating the session? Who determines what questions are answered? If Leupold is in charge of the whole exchange and not a neutral third party, it may prove difficult to get answers for the tough questions.
We should try and come together as a community with a short list of questions that we would really like answered, otherwise there’s likely to be a lot of random crap and/or softball questions thrown out there which may detract from the session. Either vote on a set of questions (possibly set up a poll on this forum), or appoint someone or a couple someones who have their ducks in a row to act as our voice. Probably not enough consensus here to get anything like what I just wrote accomplished, but it’s worth a shot.
Great suggestion. Other wise the Leupold haters will just turn it into a cluster___.
Or the guys who’ve never had a problem with a Leupold will turn it into a kumbaya recital about how great their scopes are, and nothing of value will be accomplished.
Who is moderating the session? Who determines what questions are answered? If Leupold is in charge of the whole exchange and not a neutral third party, it may prove difficult to get answers for the tough questions.
We should try and come together as a community with a short list of questions that we would really like answered, otherwise there’s likely to be a lot of random crap and/or softball questions thrown out there which may detract from the session. Either vote on a set of questions (possibly set up a poll on this forum), or appoint someone or a couple someones who have their ducks in a row to act as our voice. Probably not enough consensus here to get anything like what I just wrote accomplished, but it’s worth a shot.
This is an excellent suggestion. At the very least it will keep our question on point being asked by a pre-selected few Fire members.
Who is moderating the session? Who determines what questions are answered? If Leupold is in charge of the whole exchange and not a neutral third party, it may prove difficult to get answers for the tough questions.
We should try and come together as a community with a short list of questions that we would really like answered, otherwise there’s likely to be a lot of random crap and/or softball questions thrown out there which may detract from the session. Either vote on a set of questions (possibly set up a poll on this forum), or appoint someone or a couple someones who have their ducks in a row to act as our voice. Probably not enough consensus here to get anything like what I just wrote accomplished, but it’s worth a shot.
Great suggestion. Other wise the Leupold haters will just turn it into a cluster___.
Or the guys who’ve never had a problem with a Leupold will turn it into a kumbaya recital about how great their scopes are, and nothing of value will be accomplished.
True too.
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Who is moderating the session? Who determines what questions are answered? If Leupold is in charge of the whole exchange and not a neutral third party, it may prove difficult to get answers for the tough questions.
We should try and come together as a community with a short list of questions that we would really like answered, otherwise there’s likely to be a lot of random crap and/or softball questions thrown out there which may detract from the session. Either vote on a set of questions (possibly set up a poll on this forum), or appoint someone or a couple someones who have their ducks in a row to act as our voice. Probably not enough consensus here to get anything like what I just wrote accomplished, but it’s worth a shot.
I think this is the way to approach it. Gotta have Formid in there since he's the guy who's seen the most samples and the most failures. He would have the data to back it up.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.