Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Trayvon Martin II

Fool!

Nothing here has any bearing on the case.

And about a gazillion pages ago it was established that the bubbas were illegally chasing the jogger since they were not in pursuit of a crime they had witnessed. That ain't my opinion. That's the law. Shooting him in the course of an illegal pursuit is manslaughter. Sure, the jogger tried to defend himself. That ain't a crime.

I know you hate Negroes but your posts have helped them, by establishing that some Negroes have higher IQs than some whites.

Wait.......now it’s manslaughter? Your opinion seems to change daily.

You were duped by your beloved media with the original narrative and a video.......now ‘you’re’ just stuck.

More to come, posts are forever. Cry racist all you’d like.

Re: "informally deputized" . LoL

In other words LE recommended to Mr. English
to go see the local militia neighborhood watch
A retired reject mcmichael, cause real LE have
got better things to do with their time.

Nothing shows that English took up the offer.

Indy,

Mike's never left his small Iowa farming community.

He can't imagine not knowing the full life history of everyone he meets on the country road, let alone a real live black person.

Wow, I feel so compelled to tell you about all my domestic and international travel.

So compelled......

That’s funny.

Are you still stuck on Felony Murder for both suspects?

Still a slam dunk? Or, has your story changed too.....where a win will be a parking ticket for the driver of the truck?

Dont get ridiculous. That stupidity deserves no response.

Actually after reading many of his post, he is well spoken, educated, and seems to have a lot of common sense. Truly lacking by a lot of posters in this thread.

This^^^

I figure Aubrey read it right, at first. The shooter wasnt planning on shooting, thinking Aubrey would pull over. The shooter, if so inclined could have shot Aubrey before he got to the gun. That was not his plan.

Things changed when Aubrey grabbed the gun. Then shooter probably wondered WTF to do.

Who of you would have just given the nut your gun, even if you realised you had judged and done wrong when you pulled the gun?

Who would think, boy, I screwed up. I better give this pissed off jogger my gun.

MW is most certain he knows what Mr. English is thinking.
. that he gave a narrative so he won't be targeted with violence.

English went to lengths to have himself puposely filmed and released
on news channels...
coz thats what those fearful for their life do...

Hahahaha - are you sure you want to publicly post that? MW keeps thinking the hear say of recent crimes will be used to assist the McMichaels case... he cant get past that fact that Arbery isnt on trial for for stealing Travis’s handgun.... its Travis thats on trial for killing Arbery.

Wait... MW keeps bringing up the last time Travis harassed Arbery, he says Arbery stuck his hands down his pants... case closed... its obvious that boy needed to die...

Ejp, you're one of the dumbasses in this thread. As I've stated before, you will be proven wrong multiple times before this is over.

What makes you think McMichaels had any knowledge the video was being made, at the time?

Lots of people use guns in the commission of a felony, and claim they never had any intention to kill. They think the mere presence of the gun will be enough intimidation that they will never have to pull the trigger. Yet when someone fails to be intimidated, and the perp pulls the trigger, it is murder.

That is exactly what happened in Georgia. And just like the idiot knocking over a gas station or a bank, the McMichaels claim it is the other guy's fault. They can not even take responsibility for their actions, let alone feel remorse. It is no wonder the judge has denied bail.

Hang 'em both!

You have hurt my feelings but I'm sure you don't care. I admit to being not well educated and maybe not very smart. I was asking what you thought. Seems like you could have just said that you didn't care to answer or maybe just ignored my questions instead of bringing attention to my deficiencies. I'm just trying to understand how it could be right to chase a colored man down and threaten him with a gun on a public road.

The McMichaels had no legal right to intimidate or forcibly detain a free man on the street, because they had no knowledge, nor had they witnessed a commission of a felony.

That puts the felony on them. And they were using guns in the commission of that felony. They had no right to self defense.

It was actions taken by the McMichaels which put them in this position. A position which any reasonable man should have foreseen before they grabbed their guns and jumped in the truck to pursue someone they thought they might have circumstantial evidence which MIGHT link him to a crime which MIGHT have happened at some earlier date. Or perhaps he was considering committing a crime at some future date. So they just figured they would nip it in the bud.

Hell, there has been nothing brought to light yet which would have gotten Arbery convicted in court of theft or burglary.

What sense can anyone expect from jX on this matter?
He still insists the helicopter Kobe Bryant died in
required a blackbox, despite FAA and NTSB saying
the opposite.

Now he's showing us his superb mind reading skills
of what Mic Jnr was truly thinking at a roadblock
with shotgun in hand.

For anyone interested, jX has also got a slamdunk theory
of how Bush Snr is connected to the grassy knoll.

Seems alla the Covtards are aligned again.

Jogger Lovers

Easily the most intellectually stimulating post on a thread that would challenge the legal knowledge of a conservative SCJ.


mike r

Add one more.

"By 1994, twenty-one jurisdictions had adopted an approach that allowed specific act evidence [evidence of past acts on the part of the decedent consistent with the claims of the defendant] of the victim’s violent character to be admitted when the accused claimed she acted in self-defense because the decedent was the initial aggressor." - Page 1443