24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 33 of 95 1 2 31 32 33 34 35 94 95
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,967
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,967
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by Starman
Pagans seemed to get along just fine when
it came to personal choice of Gods.

The greeks, Romans. Gauls, and further east regions
Like Egypt, Persia, etc,.didn't squabble over their Gods.





You're missing the point: each of those societies/cultures/countries appealed to a diety or dieties and held a belief in an absolute moral code.



The moral code of Babylon differed to Sumer which differed to Judaism which was not the same as Greco Roman morality, which was not the same as ours. Similar principles, but not the same. Similarity does not make an absolute.

Similarity comes from existential conditions, death, property, family, friends, nation, state, tribe....


Each believed their God was the true God and from that belief they derived what they also believed was a non-relative standard of right and wrong by which they regulated their behavior. Exemplary are the immortal words of Lord McCauley "Then out spoke brave Horatius, the captain of the gate. To every man upon this earth Death cometh soon or late. And how can man die better Than facing fearful odds, For the ashes of his fathers, And the temples of his Gods." The salient point is that true religion and morality (not the spurious kind that characterizes so much of Christianity today [Exhibit A being our own Mr. Texas Jaguar]) tends to result in beings who regulate their own behavior without need of external regulation from the state. They don't tend to steal (for example) not merely because they might get caught, but because it is wrong. A society of those kinds of people requires a far less intrusive government than their opposite. The Founders were explicit about this.


Morality is relative to death, property and human relations, self defence, etc. The benefits to not killing wontonly are that you yourself and your family are safer if your society adopts this standard. The same for stealing, social manners, etc, everyone benefits. We don't need religion to tell us that.

Secular societies now are doing better than theocracies ever did.


Against any measure of well being, the less theocratic the society the greater the well being of it's people. The same plays out across American states.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
GB4

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,248
J
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,248
More nonsense from the perepetually ignorant AS, et al...


https://www.ucg.org/the-good-news/the-life-cycles-of-empires-lessons-for-america-today


We are in an obvious, and serious state of moral decline in the USA. Not to mention the millions of innocent babies that are slaughtered ever year here, what are some key signs of decline?

What are some common features of an empire’s culture in its declining period?

1. Rampant sexual immorality, an aversion to marriage in favor of “living together” and an increased divorce rate all combine to undermine family stability. This happened among the upper class in the late Roman Republic and early Empire. The first-century writer Seneca once complained about Roman upper-class women: “They divorce in order to re-marry. They marry in order to divorce.”

The birthrate declines, and abortion and infanticide both increase as family size is deliberately limited. The historian W.H. McNeill has referred to the “biological suicide of the Roman upper classes” as one reason for Rome’s decline. Homosexuality becomes publicly acceptable and spreads, as was the case among the ancient Greeks before Rome conquered them.

2. Many foreign immigrants settle in the empire’s capital and major cities. The mixture of ethnic groups in close proximity in these cosmopolitan places inevitably produces conflicts.

Because of their prominent locations within the empire, their influence greatly exceeds their percentage of the population. Here diversity plainly leads to divisiveness. We see this today in the growing conflict in European countries such as France and the Netherlands, where large numbers of immigrants are stoking violent cultural clashes. German chancellor Angela Merkel recently made headlines when she stated that attempts to create a multicultural society had “utterly failed” and immigrants must do more to integrate into society.

3. Both irresponsible pleasure-seeking and pessimism increase among the people and their leaders. The spirit described in 1 Corinthians 15:32 spreads throughout society: “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die!” As people cynically give up looking for solutions to the problems of life and society, they drop out of the system. They then turn to mindless entertainment, to luxuries and sexual activity, and to drugs or alcohol. The astonishingly corrupt and lavish parties of the Roman Empire’s elite are a case in point. The Emperor Nero, for instance, would spend the modern equivalent of $500,000 for just the flowers at some banquets.

4. The government provides extensive welfare for the poor. In the case of the city of Rome, which had perhaps 1.2 million people around A.D. 170, government-provided “bread and circuses” (food and entertainment) helped to keep the masses content. About one half of its non-slave population was on the dole at least part of the year. True, helping the poor shows Christian compassion (Mark 14:7). But such help also can lead to laziness and dependency (2 Thessalonians 3:10-12). Such problems are especially likely when the poor believe state-provided charity is a permanent right or entitlement.


It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,029
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,029
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by Starman
Pagans seemed to get along just fine when
it came to personal choice of Gods.

The greeks, Romans. Gauls, and further east regions
Like Egypt, Persia, etc,.didn't squabble over their Gods.





You're missing the point: each of those societies/cultures/countries appealed to a diety or dieties and held a belief in an absolute moral code.



The moral code of Babylon differed to Sumer which differed to Judaism which was not the same as Greco Roman morality, which was not the same as ours. Similar principles, but not the same. Similarity does not make an absolute.

Similarity comes from existential conditions, death, property, family, friends, nation, state, tribe....


Each believed their God was the true God and from that belief they derived what they also believed was a non-relative standard of right and wrong by which they regulated their behavior. Exemplary are the immortal words of Lord McCauley "Then out spoke brave Horatius, the captain of the gate. To every man upon this earth Death cometh soon or late. And how can man die better Than facing fearful odds, For the ashes of his fathers, And the temples of his Gods." The salient point is that true religion and morality (not the spurious kind that characterizes so much of Christianity today [Exhibit A being our own Mr. Texas Jaguar]) tends to result in beings who regulate their own behavior without need of external regulation from the state. They don't tend to steal (for example) not merely because they might get caught, but because it is wrong. A society of those kinds of people requires a far less intrusive government than their opposite. The Founders were explicit about this.


If you are claiming that only those who believe in supernatural beings can self regulate you are wrong.


What a stupid statement. Of course I'm not saying that. Stop being deliberately obtuse.


Tarquin
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,029
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,029
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Atheism is about control and power. Don't believe it? Look at Dem party. The truth is that a nation of believers requires far less government than a nation of unbelievers who are unrestrained by any moral code. This point was made repeatedly by the Founders.


Atheism is about a single proposition. Is there sufficient evidence to believe theistic claims or not. That's it, nothing more. The only way in which this proposition is about "power" is should you grant power to others on the basis of their theistic claims.



Good grief. You really believe your own nonsense don't you?


Tarquin
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,029
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,029
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by Starman
Pagans seemed to get along just fine when
it came to personal choice of Gods.

The greeks, Romans. Gauls, and further east regions
Like Egypt, Persia, etc,.didn't squabble over their Gods.





You're missing the point: each of those societies/cultures/countries appealed to a diety or dieties and held a belief in an absolute moral code.



The moral code of Babylon differed to Sumer which differed to Judaism which was not the same as Greco Roman morality, which was not the same as ours. Similar principles, but not the same. Similarity does not make an absolute.

Similarity comes from existential conditions, death, property, family, friends, nation, state, tribe....


Each believed their God was the true God and from that belief they derived what they also believed was a non-relative standard of right and wrong by which they regulated their behavior. Exemplary are the immortal words of Lord McCauley "Then out spoke brave Horatius, the captain of the gate. To every man upon this earth Death cometh soon or late. And how can man die better Than facing fearful odds, For the ashes of his fathers, And the temples of his Gods." The salient point is that true religion and morality (not the spurious kind that characterizes so much of Christianity today [Exhibit A being our own Mr. Texas Jaguar]) tends to result in beings who regulate their own behavior without need of external regulation from the state. They don't tend to steal (for example) not merely because they might get caught, but because it is wrong. A society of those kinds of people requires a far less intrusive government than their opposite. The Founders were explicit about this.


Morality is relative to death, property and human relations, self defence, etc. The benefits to not killing wontonly are that you yourself and your family are safer if your society adopts this standard. The same for stealing, social manners, etc, everyone benefits. We don't need religion to tell us that.

Secular societies now are doing better than theocracies ever did.


Against any measure of well being, the less theocratic the society the greater the well being of it's people. The same plays out across American states.


False. Utah.


Tarquin
IC B2

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,687
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,687
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Against any measure of well being, the less theocratic the society the greater the well being of it's people. The same plays out across American states.


Well, if you are looking at the U.S., we are not and never have been a theocratic nation; and we are the most well-off society in history, at least in material terms. However, well-being goes far beyond material goods. The social pathologies we are seeing, despite our material prosperity, would indicate that people have needs beyond material goods. We are not in the mess we are in today because as a nation we have become increasingly Christian.


The biggest problem our country has is not systemic racism, it's systemic stupidity.
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,967
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,967
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by Starman
Pagans seemed to get along just fine when
it came to personal choice of Gods.

The greeks, Romans. Gauls, and further east regions
Like Egypt, Persia, etc,.didn't squabble over their Gods.





You're missing the point: each of those societies/cultures/countries appealed to a diety or dieties and held a belief in an absolute moral code.



The moral code of Babylon differed to Sumer which differed to Judaism which was not the same as Greco Roman morality, which was not the same as ours. Similar principles, but not the same. Similarity does not make an absolute.

Similarity comes from existential conditions, death, property, family, friends, nation, state, tribe....


Each believed their God was the true God and from that belief they derived what they also believed was a non-relative standard of right and wrong by which they regulated their behavior. Exemplary are the immortal words of Lord McCauley "Then out spoke brave Horatius, the captain of the gate. To every man upon this earth Death cometh soon or late. And how can man die better Than facing fearful odds, For the ashes of his fathers, And the temples of his Gods." The salient point is that true religion and morality (not the spurious kind that characterizes so much of Christianity today [Exhibit A being our own Mr. Texas Jaguar]) tends to result in beings who regulate their own behavior without need of external regulation from the state. They don't tend to steal (for example) not merely because they might get caught, but because it is wrong. A society of those kinds of people requires a far less intrusive government than their opposite. The Founders were explicit about this.


If you are claiming that only those who believe in supernatural beings can self regulate you are wrong.


What a stupid statement. Of course I'm not saying that. Stop being deliberately obtuse.


Then you just nullified your own argument.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,029
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,029
No. I did not.


Tarquin
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Religion, especially the hope of a paradise waiting after death was a powerful thing to a slave population.

Until very recent times, even those people not in chains were enslaved by their environment. They spent most every waking moment tending their flocks, gathering herbs and roots, or hunting meat. As soon as they could walk at their Mother's side, they began helping in the gathering of food. Or the little ones took their dogs and tended flocks and chased away predators.

Religion and the thought of Heaven gave them hope of some reward after their unending suffering with labor, hunger, pestilence and early death.

Today, in developed nations, there is much less need for such. It is a natural progression, just as is the move toward smaller families.


I watched a beautiful sunset on the back deck the other night. Thin white clouds and pale blue sky up high. Low clouds in the foreground that were dark gray underneath and bright gold on top from the setting sun.
No wonder the people once believed including those who put the bible together thought that was where heaven could be found. Cloud pictures are still used today to depict “Heaven.”

“According to Genesis, they did believe that Heaven was located above the earth (in fact, in Hebrew, the same word means “Heavens” and “Skies.”
Genesis 28:12
“Then [Jacob] dreamed, and behold, a ladder was set up on the earth, and its top reached to heaven; and there the angels of God were ascending and descending on it."


Leo of the Land of Dyr

NRA FOR LIFE

I MISS SARAH

“In Trump We Trust.” Right????

SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."












Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,999
3
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
3
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,999



Religion & Donkeys

"A donkey is a simple creature.
It would follow a carrot on a stick, but it is still capable,
even with it's most basic of intellect,
of determining when there is no carrot."

-John Kelly Ireland


"I'd rather have an Army of Asses led by a Lion, than an Army of Lions led by an Ass." (George Washington)
IC B3

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,091
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,091
The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge. Psalms 19:1
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Religion, especially the hope of a paradise waiting after death was a powerful thing to a slave population.

Until very recent times, even those people not in chains were enslaved by their environment. They spent most every waking moment tending their flocks, gathering herbs and roots, or hunting meat. As soon as they could walk at their Mother's side, they began helping in the gathering of food. Or the little ones took their dogs and tended flocks and chased away predators.

Religion and the thought of Heaven gave them hope of some reward after their unending suffering with labor, hunger, pestilence and early death.

Today, in developed nations, there is much less need for such. It is a natural progression, just as is the move toward smaller families.


I watched a beautiful sunset on the back deck the other night. Thin white clouds and pale blue sky up high. Low clouds in the foreground that were dark gray underneath and bright gold on top from the setting sun.
No wonder the people once believed including those who put the bible together thought that was where heaven could be found. Cloud pictures are still used today to depict “Heaven.”

“According to Genesis, they did believe that Heaven was located above the earth (in fact, in Hebrew, the same word means “Heavens” and “Skies.”
Genesis 28:12
“Then [Jacob] dreamed, and behold, a ladder was set up on the earth, and its top reached to heaven; and there the angels of God were ascending and descending on it."

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 45,145
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 45,145
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by Valsdad
12 now, going to 20 pages???


6 Pages.

You need to fix your pages to fit a lot more quality viewing at one time. wink


28 pages now................by my count.

14? by yours?

either way, I have to scroll through them all to find the piece of corn. grin


The desert is a true treasure for him who seeks refuge from men and the evil of men.
In it is contentment
In it is death and all you seek
(Quoted from "The Bleeding of the Stone" Ibrahim Al-Koni)

member of the cabal of dysfunctional squirrels?
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,761
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,761
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Religion, especially the hope of a paradise waiting after death was a powerful thing to a slave population.

Until very recent times, even those people not in chains were enslaved by their environment. They spent most every waking moment tending their flocks, gathering herbs and roots, or hunting meat. As soon as they could walk at their Mother's side, they began helping in the gathering of food. Or the little ones took their dogs and tended flocks and chased away predators.

Religion and the thought of Heaven gave them hope of some reward after their unending suffering with labor, hunger, pestilence and early death.

Today, in developed nations, there is much less need for such. It is a natural progression, just as is the move toward smaller families.



Hunter/gatherers... enslaved by their environment....I certainly dont see it that way, they spent most of their time surviving, I more so think they relished in it, there were no alternate lifestyles to choose from.... no advertising telling them how their life should be. they lived day to day, sometimes they flourished, sometimes they suffered.....I doubt they filled their days with hope of a afterlife...
People need hope more now than ever as there are so many things outside their control that influence their lives....

When hunting all day, they just hoped they found something to eat,


For those without thumbs, it's s Garden fookin Island, not Hawaii
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,859
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,859
Originally Posted by antlers
People are sure jumping ship and swimming away from religion at an attention getting rate nowadays. Christianity especially. But I don’t think it’s because atheism is so appealing. I think it’s more likely because religion has lost its appeal. People once thought religion offered solutions. Nowadays, it appears that many people see it as a problem. I can’t blame em’ for it. There’s sure a lotta hate spewed at em’ in the name of God. It clearly is unattractive to those who are on the receiving end of it. Grace is supposed to be a hallmark of the Christian faith...but it seems to very often be sorely lacking by many who profess to be Christians. The faith of Christianity is certainly more appealing when the message of grace is most apparent.

What’s this got to do with evolution...?
Not a flippin’ thing...!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯


If evolution is true and the Bible is not, then there was no fall in the Garden of Eden so there is no need for Jesus the Savior. I remember one evolutionist in a lecture saying something like, "If we can destroy Genesis One we will find the burning remains of Jesus' cross in the ashes."


"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation."
Everyday Hunter
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,687
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,687
Originally Posted by Ringman
Originally Posted by antlers
People are sure jumping ship and swimming away from religion at an attention getting rate nowadays. Christianity especially. But I don’t think it’s because atheism is so appealing. I think it’s more likely because religion has lost its appeal. People once thought religion offered solutions. Nowadays, it appears that many people see it as a problem. I can’t blame em’ for it. There’s sure a lotta hate spewed at em’ in the name of God. It clearly is unattractive to those who are on the receiving end of it. Grace is supposed to be a hallmark of the Christian faith...but it seems to very often be sorely lacking by many who profess to be Christians. The faith of Christianity is certainly more appealing when the message of grace is most apparent.

What’s this got to do with evolution...?
Not a flippin’ thing...!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯


If evolution is true and the Bible is not, then there was no fall in the Garden of Eden so there is no need for Jesus the Savior. I remember one evolutionist in a lecture saying something like, "If we can destroy Genesis One we will find the burning remains of Jesus' cross in the ashes."


Exactly right.


The biggest problem our country has is not systemic racism, it's systemic stupidity.
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,893
I
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
I
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,893
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper


Morality is relative to death, property and human relations, self defence, etc. The benefits to not killing wontonly are that you yourself and your family are safer if your society adopts this standard. The same for stealing, social manners, etc, everyone benefits. We don't need religion to tell us that.

Secular societies now are doing better than theocracies ever did.


Against any measure of well being, the less theocratic the society the greater the well being of it's people. The same plays out across American states.


False. Utah.
[/quote]
Apparently you have little knowledge of Utah's early history. Or you are wearing Morman blinders.

Now, don't take this wrong. I have no problem with the modern LDS Church. They are one of the most conservative and family oriented groups out there. But 19'th century Utah was not a friendly place to be if you were not Morman.

For ex: ZMCI...Zion Mercantile Co-op Inc, an organization of merchants within the Morman Church. If a non member moved into town and tried to compete, the member merchants sold their inventory at a loss until the interloper was run out of town. Their losses subsidized by the Co-op.

Mountain Meadows Massacre?

The Utah War? US Army vs Mormans May 1857- July 1858.

Many of the present day Mormans I know refuse to acknowledge that any such events ever happened. Revisionist history abounds.

Utah really began to prosper when the theocracy was subjugated and the state became an actual part of the Union.


People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,893
I
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
I
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,893
Originally Posted by johnn
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Religion, especially the hope of a paradise waiting after death was a powerful thing to a slave population.

Until very recent times, even those people not in chains were enslaved by their environment. They spent most every waking moment tending their flocks, gathering herbs and roots, or hunting meat. As soon as they could walk at their Mother's side, they began helping in the gathering of food. Or the little ones took their dogs and tended flocks and chased away predators.

Religion and the thought of Heaven gave them hope of some reward after their unending suffering with labor, hunger, pestilence and early death.

Today, in developed nations, there is much less need for such. It is a natural progression, just as is the move toward smaller families.



Hunter/gatherers... enslaved by their environment....I certainly dont see it that way, they spent most of their time surviving, I more so think they relished in it, there were no alternate lifestyles to choose from.... no advertising telling them how their life should be. they lived day to day, sometimes they flourished, sometimes they suffered.....I doubt they filled their days with hope of a afterlife...
People need hope more now than ever as there are so many things outside their control that influence their lives....

When hunting all day, they just hoped they found something to eat,


Nothing says relish quite like wading through waste deep snow, clothed only in chewed animal hides, hoping you can a bit of carrion left by a wolf, or get close enough to a rabbit to poke it with a sharp stick. Because you have a wigwam or cave full of starving kids with their teeth falling out from malnutrition.

Or trying to dig enough roots and bulbs with a sharp stick to keep a family through the winter, and then hoping they do not all rot before winter equinox.

They must have relished the life like a wild mustang relishes pawing through the deep snow in hopes of finding a tuft of grass.


People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,029
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,029
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper


Morality is relative to death, property and human relations, self defence, etc. The benefits to not killing wontonly are that you yourself and your family are safer if your society adopts this standard. The same for stealing, social manners, etc, everyone benefits. We don't need religion to tell us that.

Secular societies now are doing better than theocracies ever did.


Against any measure of well being, the less theocratic the society the greater the well being of it's people. The same plays out across American states.


False. Utah.

Apparently you have little knowledge of Utah's early history. Or you are wearing Morman blinders.

Now, don't take this wrong. I have no problem with the modern LDS Church. They are one of the most conservative and family oriented groups out there. But 19'th century Utah was not a friendly place to be if you were not Morman.

For ex: ZMCI...Zion Mercantile Co-op Inc, an organization of merchants within the Morman Church. If a non member moved into town and tried to compete, the member merchants sold their inventory at a loss until the interloper was run out of town. Their losses subsidized by the Co-op.

Mountain Meadows Massacre?

The Utah War? US Army vs Mormans May 1857- July 1858.

Many of the present day Mormans I know refuse to acknowledge that any such events ever happened. Revisionist history abounds.

Utah really began to prosper when the theocracy was subjugated and the state became an actual part of the Union.[/quote]

My point was to refute AS's claim by pointing out that the social health indicators of Mormons are very high, thus defeating his claim that in every case religiosity doesn't correlate with social virtue. The Mountain Meadows massacre or other such facts do not rebutt my point. Every religion and secular ideology has committed atrocities. I'm no expert on history, but didn't he Mormons also suffer a fair amount of persecution at the hands of so-called "Chrisitans"?

Last edited by Tarquin; 06/18/20.

Tarquin
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,967
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,967
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper


Morality is relative to death, property and human relations, self defence, etc. The benefits to not killing wontonly are that you yourself and your family are safer if your society adopts this standard. The same for stealing, social manners, etc, everyone benefits. We don't need religion to tell us that.

Secular societies now are doing better than theocracies ever did.


Against any measure of well being, the less theocratic the society the greater the well being of it's people. The same plays out across American states.


False. Utah.

Apparently you have little knowledge of Utah's early history. Or you are wearing Morman blinders.

Now, don't take this wrong. I have no problem with the modern LDS Church. They are one of the most conservative and family oriented groups out there. But 19'th century Utah was not a friendly place to be if you were not Morman.

For ex: ZMCI...Zion Mercantile Co-op Inc, an organization of merchants within the Morman Church. If a non member moved into town and tried to compete, the member merchants sold their inventory at a loss until the interloper was run out of town. Their losses subsidized by the Co-op.

Mountain Meadows Massacre?

The Utah War? US Army vs Mormans May 1857- July 1858.

Many of the present day Mormans I know refuse to acknowledge that any such events ever happened. Revisionist history abounds.

Utah really began to prosper when the theocracy was subjugated and the state became an actual part of the Union.


My point was to refute AS's claim by pointing out that the social health indicators of Mormons are very high, thus defeating his claim that in every case religiosity doesn't correlate with social virtue. The Mountain Meadows massacre or other such facts do not rebutt my point. Every religion and secular ideology has committed atrocities. I'm no expert on history, but didn't he Mormons also suffer a fair amount of persecution at the hands of so-called "Chrisitans"?
[/quote]

I said against every measure, not in every instance. They are not the same thing.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper


Morality is relative to death, property and human relations, self defence, etc. The benefits to not killing wontonly are that you yourself and your family are safer if your society adopts this standard. The same for stealing, social manners, etc, everyone benefits. We don't need religion to tell us that.

Secular societies now are doing better than theocracies ever did.


Against any measure of well being, the less theocratic the society the greater the well being of it's people. The same plays out across American states.


False. Utah.

Apparently you have little knowledge of Utah's early history. Or you are wearing Morman blinders.

Now, don't take this wrong. I have no problem with the modern LDS Church. They are one of the most conservative and family oriented groups out there. But 19'th century Utah was not a friendly place to be if you were not Morman.

For ex: ZMCI...Zion Mercantile Co-op Inc, an organization of merchants within the Morman Church. If a non member moved into town and tried to compete, the member merchants sold their inventory at a loss until the interloper was run out of town. Their losses subsidized by the Co-op.

Mountain Meadows Massacre?

The Utah War? US Army vs Mormans May 1857- July 1858.

Many of the present day Mormans I know refuse to acknowledge that any such events ever happened. Revisionist history abounds.

Utah really began to prosper when the theocracy was subjugated and the state became an actual part of the Union.


My point was to refute AS's claim by pointing out that the social health indicators of Mormons are very high, thus defeating his claim that in every case religiosity doesn't correlate with social virtue. The Mountain Meadows massacre or other such facts do not rebutt my point. Every religion and secular ideology has committed atrocities. I'm no expert on history, but didn't he Mormons also suffer a fair amount of persecution at the hands of so-called "Chrisitans"?


I said against every measure, not in every instance. They are not the same thing.

[/quote]

I am sure you already know this, but persecution is why the Mormons have to move so much.


Leo of the Land of Dyr

NRA FOR LIFE

I MISS SARAH

“In Trump We Trust.” Right????

SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."












Page 33 of 95 1 2 31 32 33 34 35 94 95

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

577 members (160user, 007FJ, 10Glocks, 01Foreman400, 10gaugemag, 17CalFan, 55 invisible), 2,458 guests, and 1,348 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,946
Posts18,480,238
Members73,954
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.097s Queries: 16 (0.007s) Memory: 0.9455 MB (Peak: 1.1576 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-30 22:27:41 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS