|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19
Campfire Oracle
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19 |
Bowsinger, this has been explained to you many times and yet you choose to not listen. Now it is time for you to quit this and be quiet while we pray for you. God knows you need all the help you can get. Keep telling yourself GOD is cheering those buds of yours who kicked HIM out of our schools and push homosexuality on the kids and pushed abortion and now push infanticide. Keep drinking your mind numbing kool--aid. There will be a great gnashing....
Last edited by jaguartx; 07/09/20.
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,502
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,502 |
Genetics was used by the Egyptians and they used Fibonacci sequences as their "algebra" to explain the mechanics.
some Biology (outdated taxonomy) uses as their "algebra" to explain differences, or when their is a difference -- the math of Bertrand Russell -- Set Theory, or Boolean type logic instead of Fuzzy Logic of Zadeh, as in when does a cat become a dog.
like comparing apples and oranges hmmm
apples and oranges have more in common than not in common
same size same weight almost same amt. of carbohydrates both have seeds both can be cut with a knife. Whatever you're on must be really good. This is another really good example of set theory dogma. most folks think that a set has something in it,, but there is an empty set called the Null Set --- nothing there zero, this is a living example it also forms the basis of the Null Hypothesis, used in probability theory,, simply stating that this much empty cant exist so the opposite must exist.
Most people don't have what it takes to get old
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19
Campfire Oracle
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19 |
like comparing apples and oranges hmmm
apples and oranges have more in common than not in common
same size same weight almost same amt. of carbohydrates both have seeds both can be cut with a knife. [/quote]
So, im wondering what was the reason for the driving force to make them become more specialized, or different if you will.
Was there a driving need for a fruit that was more acidic, I mean, other than an intelligent plan to make more variety for man?
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,663
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,663 |
like comparing apples and oranges hmmm
apples and oranges have more in common than not in common
same size same weight almost same amt. of carbohydrates both have seeds both can be cut with a knife. Perhaps, in the least eloquent manner possible, you could answer a question. These apples and oranges....despite all they have in common, can they (or have they ever) produce(d) fruit with each other?
“When debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.” - Socrates
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,663
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,663 |
Genetics was used by the Egyptians and they used Fibonacci sequences as their "algebra" to explain the mechanics.
some Biology (outdated taxonomy) uses as their "algebra" to explain differences, or when their is a difference -- the math of Bertrand Russell -- Set Theory, or Boolean type logic instead of Fuzzy Logic of Zadeh, as in when does a cat become a dog.
like comparing apples and oranges hmmm
apples and oranges have more in common than not in common
same size same weight almost same amt. of carbohydrates both have seeds both can be cut with a knife. Whatever you're on must be really good. This is another really good example of set theory dogma. most folks think that a set has something in it,, but there is an empty set called the Null Set --- nothing there zero, this is a living example it also forms the basis of the Null Hypothesis, used in probability theory,, simply stating that this much empty cant exist so the opposite must exist. Ha ha ha ha ha!
“When debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.” - Socrates
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,936 Likes: 5
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,936 Likes: 5 |
It’s a common misinterpretation of evolution to think that humans were lineally descended from existing species of apes. Some people think that a fossil ape-man or man-ape seems necessary in order to ‘prove’ evolution. Today it is widely recognized that the relationship of modern humans to the present species of apes is through common ancestors ‘rather’ than through direct descent. I heard an evolutionist in lecture say something like, "If we could find the common ancestor of man and ape it would look like an ape."
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,502
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,502 |
like comparing apples and oranges hmmm
apples and oranges have more in common than not in common
same size same weight almost same amt. of carbohydrates both have seeds both can be cut with a knife. Perhaps, in the least eloquent manner possible, you could answer a question. These apples and oranges....despite all they have in common, can they (or have they ever) produce(d) fruit with each other? Don't think Delicious and Naval have got it on, although I know they set beside each other at the store. Positive that Envy and Tangerines have, how else could Mandarins be so much better. Pretty sure Honeycrisp has been seeing Grapefruit to answer directly yes they can produce , if you would like to donate to my genetics lab we can finish question up a the Myriad genetics lab in SLC not sure what the point would be though
Most people don't have what it takes to get old
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,586 Likes: 16
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,586 Likes: 16 |
It’s a common misinterpretation of evolution to think that humans were lineally descended from existing species of apes. Some people think that a fossil ape-man or man-ape seems necessary in order to ‘prove’ evolution. Today it is widely recognized that the relationship of modern humans to the present species of apes is through common ancestors ‘rather’ than through direct descent. I heard an evolutionist in lecture say something like, "If we could find the common ancestor of man and ape it would look like an ape." That’s contrary to the scientific consensus.
Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,502
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,502 |
It’s a common misinterpretation of evolution to think that humans were lineally descended from existing species of apes. Some people think that a fossil ape-man or man-ape seems necessary in order to ‘prove’ evolution. Today it is widely recognized that the relationship of modern humans to the present species of apes is through common ancestors ‘rather’ than through direct descent. I heard an evolutionist in lecture say something like, "If we could find the common ancestor of man and ape it would look like an ape." I heard a Parathenogenist say, If we could find the common ancestor of man and ape it would like a tree. Whats your point? The question assumes a exclusive set of arguments.
Most people don't have what it takes to get old
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,663
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,663 |
if you would like to donate to my genetics lab we can finish question up a the Myriad genetics lab in SLC
A genetics lab in SLC. With D-way so close, I’d imagine genetics efforts in that area are quite interesting.
“When debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.” - Socrates
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994 |
Bowsinger, this has been explained to you many times and yet you choose to not listen. Now it is time for you to quit this and be quiet while we pray for you. God knows you need all the help you can get. I am just a simpleton and have no idea exactly what has been explained to me or anyone else on this thread. The old Bible thread was better. So many Biblical contradictions got posted on there, it was almost embarrassing. Even I did not know or remember how bloodthirsty the Old Testament really was. Jesus’s old Man was a real SOB. He would have fit well on the ‘Fire.
Leo of the Land of Dyr
NRA FOR LIFE
I MISS SARAH
“In Trump We Trust.” Right????
SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,936 Likes: 5
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,936 Likes: 5 |
It’s a common misinterpretation of evolution to think that humans were lineally descended from existing species of apes. Some people think that a fossil ape-man or man-ape seems necessary in order to ‘prove’ evolution. Today it is widely recognized that the relationship of modern humans to the present species of apes is through common ancestors ‘rather’ than through direct descent. I heard an evolutionist in lecture say something like, "If we could find the common ancestor of man and ape it would look like an ape." That’s contrary to the scientific consensus. Science is not based on consensus. Science is based on observation and repeatability. Creation and evolution are exactly the same: Both happened in the past and are taken on faith. Therefore it is incumbent upon the observers to set aside their biases, as much as is possible, and search for the most likely "facts". That's why evolutionists become creationists and not the reverse.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,527 Likes: 6
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,527 Likes: 6 |
apples and oranges have more in common than not in common
same size same weight almost same amt. of carbohydrates both have seeds both can be cut with a knife.
So, im wondering what was the reason for the driving force to make them become more specialized, or different if you will. [/quote] Didn't you ever go to high school? Those so-called similarities are shared by all fruits that evolved to have their seeds spread by herbivores. What was the driving force? A random genetic mutation occurs. Mostly it has no value and does not propogate through the species. If it has some survival value, more offspring will have that variation and it will become more standard. An example is white skin. Homo sapiens all had dark skin until perhaps 8,000 years ago. A light skin mutation quickly spread through European Homo sapiens (your ancestors) because it helps UV radiation from the sun produce more Vitamin D. Those with the light skin mutation survived to produce more offspring. That's why you're "white." Dark skin is better for survival in the tropics. Homo neanderthal, which separated from your stock a lot earlier, developed a different mutation for white skin. There are many other examples. If the Caucasian and Negro races remained separate for a few hundred thousand years (which won't happen), they would each acquire a different genetic load through mutations that would eventually prevent them from interbreeding. Evolution is as simple as that and that's how different species arise. Sometimes different species which are somewhat closely interrelated can interbreed. Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthal, for instance. Wolves and dogs in the wild. Lions and tigers (but not in the wild). Horses and donkeys (though the offspring are infertile). But those of more genetic distande, such as dogs and cats, cannot interbreed. Could humans and chim-panzees interbreed? Asking that question would certainly be forbidden. The two branches diverged about 7,000,000 years ago so the answer is probably no.
Don't blame me. I voted for Trump.
Democrats would burn this country to the ground, if they could rule over the ashes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19
Campfire Oracle
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19 |
Bowsinger, this has been explained to you many times and yet you choose to not listen. Now it is time for you to quit this and be quiet while we pray for you. God knows you need all the help you can get. I am just a simpleton and have no idea exactly what has been explained to me or anyone else on this thread. The old Bible thread was better. So many Biblical contradictions got posted on there, it was almost embarrassing. Even I did not know or remember how bloodthirsty the Old Testament really was. Jesus’s old Man was a real SOB. He would have fit well on the ‘Fire. If justice were to prevail over tyranny in this country, there would be blood flowing bridle length....uh, nevermind.
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,586 Likes: 16
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,586 Likes: 16 |
Science is not based on consensus. lol Nobody said it was. Science is based on observation and repeatability. And the general agreement...overwhelmingly...in science, based on observation and repeatability, supports evolution. Evolution is zero threat to the faith of SO many Jesus followers; why does it appear to be such a threat to your faith...?
Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19
Campfire Oracle
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19 |
apples and oranges have more in common than not in common
same size same weight almost same amt. of carbohydrates both have seeds both can be cut with a knife.
So, im wondering what was the reason for the driving force to make them become more specialized, or different if you will. Didn't you ever go to high school? Those so-called similarities are shared by all fruits that evolved to have their seeds spread by herbivores. What was the driving force? A random genetic mutation occurs. Mostly it has no value and does not propogate through the species. If it has some survival value, more offspring will have that variation and it will become more standard. An example is white skin. Homo sapiens all had dark skin until perhaps 8,000 years ago. A light skin mutation quickly spread through European Homo sapiens (your ancestors) because it helps UV radiation from the sun produce more Vitamin D. Those with the light skin mutation survived to produce more offspring. That's why you're "white." Dark skin is better for survival in the tropics. Homo neanderthal, which separated from your stock a lot earlier, developed a different mutation for white skin. There are many other examples. If the Caucasian and Negro races remained separate for a few hundred thousand years (which won't happen), they would each acquire a different genetic load through mutations that would eventually prevent them from interbreeding. Evolution is as simple as that and that's how different species arise. Sometimes different species which are somewhat closely interrelated can interbreed. Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthal, for instance. Wolves and dogs in the wild. Lions and tigers (but not in the wild). Horses and donkeys (though the offspring are infertile). But those of more genetic distande, such as dogs and cats, cannot interbreed. Could humans and chim-panzees interbreed? Asking that question would certainly be forbidden. The two branches diverged about 7,000,000 years ago so the answer is probably no. [/quote] So, the first human born from a [bleep] couldnt interbreed with its sibling of the opposite sex? I suppose it was just good luck another such human of the same genetic mutation but of the opposite sex was dropped by a monkey in an adjoining tree. Then they grew up bossom buds and made whoopi. From there we were off to the proverbial races, as different as they would soom prove to be. Im sorry you are so stuck to unproven science you havent the ability to delve into theoretical philosophy without being thrown out of yout circadian rythm. Now, tell me how the Bell Curve doesnt really pass scientic muster. As i expected, so much for your love of science.
Last edited by jaguartx; 07/09/20.
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19
Campfire Oracle
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19 |
I thought science proved that as time progressed, things became less specialized.
Put tame feral pigs in the forest for generations and they eventually revert back to the hogs they were originally. IOW, less specialized.
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,502
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,502 |
main difference between apples and oranges is citric acid.
once man figured out they needed Vit C, oranges (citrus fruit) was carried wherever shipping went.
apples meh, high fructose, requiring ATP and purines spells gout.
Most people don't have what it takes to get old
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19
Campfire Oracle
|
OP
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,081 Likes: 19 |
main difference between apples and oranges is citric acid.
once man figured out they needed Vit C, oranges (citrus fruit) was carried wherever shipping went.
apples meh, high fructose, requiring ATP and purines spells gout. Yes, but how did apples know to become oranges because man needed Vit C. The apple came first . Remember, there was an apple tree in the Garden of Eden.
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,502
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,502 |
Todays science is, unfortunately ,a consensus
reasons being it is not science, but technology ----- there is a difference.
Not one great scientific idea or breakthrough was done by consensus.
somebody had a revelation, an epiphany, call it what you want, and all the players lined up. it was because they "knew" science (at least up to that point in history) more players lined up
Most people don't have what it takes to get old
|
|
|
|
587 members (10Glocks, 12344mag, 16Racing, 1234, 160user, 10gaugeman, 62 invisible),
2,502
guests, and
1,327
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,346
Posts18,526,939
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|