Originally Posted by jorgeI
Pete: Yes but for a different reason, if the property was owned by one of Mugabe's thugs then US clients at least were subject to prosecution under the Lacey Act.


Yes, I recall that, but I also seem to recall the Parks management were very unhappy with the situation and there was a lot of legal wrangling whether the new "owners" could legally sell hunts on the ground..

I get the impression that certain people within the Parks department are still very old school, but the issue comes from Robber Bobs cronies being "parachuted" in above and below them, and also into "management" positions within the Safari company's themselves..

One thing I have no doubt is that had the denist been a supporter/crony of Robber Bob, then this would have been a non issue..

reagdrs,

Peter