4,
thanks, I thought that might be the story. It's what I was alluding to in my statement about the link being "telling".
When I saw the panel's comments about the judge I knew something was up. Not very common at all to have a sitting justice criticized in public, in a decision like that, and have his case sent back to another person for reconsideration. It's not a case of "Judge, get your s--t together and smarten up in these rulings and we'll send them back to you". More like "sir, your work here is done, someone else will take over now".
Thanks for the clarification.
Geno