I'm quite familiar with correction factors and ballistic software I was being facetious to prove a point- skip the lengthy math conversions and start with the simplified version, buy a scope that adjusts and tracks correctly in MOA or mils.
A tall target test and the use of the correlated adjustment correction factor is a smart move with a reliable scope, but it's a waste of time with a scope that may pass the test today, and tomorrow have you chucking it off a cliff...
Yeah I realized you were jesting . I was just taking the opportunity to let the OP know that non-standard click adjustments can be folded into the SF so that the clicks calculated by a ballistics calculator will correctly match his scope's clicks. I totally agree with you about making sure that you have a good quality scope with accurate and repeatable tracking [especially accurate return to zero] is paramount if you are going to dial turrets for long range shooting. It will certainly save a lot of frustration.
I was being facetious to prove a point- skip the lengthy math conversions and start with the simplified version, buy a scope that adjusts and tracks correctly in MOA or mils.
. I was just taking the opportunity to let the OP know that non-standard click adjustments can be folded into the SF so that the clicks calculated by a ballistics calculator will correctly match his scope's clicks. I totally agree with you about making sure that you have a good quality scope with accurate and repeatable tracking [
