Your own ignorance is clouding your judgement - you're making statements based on facts that just ain't so. Reread my post carefully and compare it to what you wrote. If you can't figure it out from there I don't think I can help you, you either don't comprehend or more likely don't want to.
I didn't criticize las for not using a chronograph - lots of people don't. Lots of people don't use optic sights at all, don't use metallic cartridges, etc...
This wasn't a point of contention about how luddite a system can be and work to kill game. las was making it clear that a chronograph doesn't supply any useful information and that's why he doesn't use one. He's wrong on both counts.
David
You write as though you are an expert on my ignorance and my judgment, as well as my willingness to learn. Some folks are experts on those topics, but you know nothing about those - or me in general. Not a good start.
In an effort to redeem yourself, you might try to identify and dismantle those "statements based on facts that just ain't so".
I did not seek your help, so don't feel too bad about your inability to deliver any.
What I asked for was your justification for labeling
las interesting post as "stupid". You have not justified that critique. Bad form.
Just the opposite of your above statement,
las did note some usefulness of a chronograph. You can read it in his post.
I may remember your posting the next time I set up my Chrony.
