So saying a scope is optically superior to another scope is "slamming" it? Geez...
So you and everybody you know say a $220 Leupold VX-I 2-7 rimfire scope is the same, optically, as the new $130 Redfield 2-7?
If they are indeed optically the same, then my comparison of the Vortex Diamondback to the VX-I would then be entirely relevant, as I personally compared the Diamondback and the VX-I and found the Diamondback to be brighter with better contrast and resolution.
And again, in my opinion, the Vortex is a better scope, and is worth $40 more than the Redfield and is a steal at $50 less than the Leupold.
