maybe I was wrong, maybe I misconstrued the entire point of the gel testing science which says that until you get above 2200 FPS the temporary wound cavities remain temporary????? Am I in the twilight zone or did they say that at 2200-2300 the temporary wound cavity exceeds the tissues ability to stretch and it tears the tissue resulting in more damage further from the entry wound. Which to someone in the Mensa society MIGHT mean that a 77 grain .22 caliber SMK thru your chest at 2400 FPS would be slightly more injurious to your carcass than a 44 magnum 240 grain soft point thru the same hole? My disclaimer is that you would certainly feel more manly handling the recoil and making the shot with the 44 magnum. For those of you who are NOT mensa members, the statistics of gun shot wounding show 44 magnum has about the same effectiveness as 9mm, 40SW, and 45ACP, however the bullets do make a bigger splat on the wall behind the intended target.
And how many .44 Mag cases were represented in those statistics? Two? Three? Statistically insignificant.
