Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
Originally Posted by jdm953
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
Originally Posted by MontanaMan
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
It is a felony to brandish firearms. They knew this, I am sure.


So howyasupposed to protect yer house from the mob if'n ya can't handle yer weapon??

MM

Not by running out onto the lawn/driveway with firearms in ready position while said mob passes by on the road. If they step onto your lawn, you can demand they leave. If you see violent intent, according to the laws of your state/city, you may be able to protect yourself with force. The law would see it that way, just as they are. The owners of said gated community would have the right to kick people off the road and out of the community.

Once they broke through the gate onto private property they became trespassers.

Funny how the DA gives no [bleep]....what they did is called brandishing. Look it up. It's a felony. Keep trying to convince yourselves, boys.



It's not a crime if you reasonably feared for your life or property.

Originally Posted by Fubarski
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
Originally Posted by Fubarski
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
[Pointing a firearm at people not attacking you is not covered in any "stand your ground" law.


Wrong.

Put down the pipe, man. Meth is bad for you. You can't accost "protesters" with a firearm and be "standing your ground." I don't know how you could possibly see it otherwise, except for the meth you are obviously smoking.


You don't know WTF you're posin about.

Missouri's SYG and Castle Doctrine laws allow a person to use lethal force to defend themselves from a threat wherever they have a right to be.

These people certainly had a right to be on their own property, and the attackers didn't.

So, they had a right to defend themselves against the attackers, up to using lethal force.

If you want to play semantic games like a liberal, "protestors" protest in permitted public areas.

Attackers kick down a gate and come onto people's private property.

This is a dead end for the prosecutor.

Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
[quote=HuntnShoot]Pointing a firearm at people not attacking you is not covered in any "stand your ground" law.[/quote


Pointing a firearm at people criminals, who have destroyed private property (DESTROYED GATE) to GAIN access to PRIVATE PROPERTY(GATED COMMUNITY) not IS attacking you AND "IS" not covered in any "stand your ground" law.

The group, BLM, have already established a precedent proving out they are criminals from the murders and property destruction they have caused.

With that hard fact established, any citizen in that gated community had a right to brandish arms against a criminal gang once they destroyed property to gain access and stepped across the boundary line of the broken gate, because they would legally be within their right to claim in fear of their life, based on the precedent established and present destruction of property at their doorstep, destroyed gate.

The D.A. doesn't have squat.


How many of that violent, criminal, trespassing mob were arrested? How many of these violent felons that violated the property and safety of that community are now facing charges?

None of you get it. The facts don't matter. There is no law and order, because those who control the narrative control the "facts". According to their narrative, those were protesters, and the couple committed a crime. The DA agrees. So who is right and who is wrong, here? Use your fuucking brains, numbskulls.

I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.