Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
Originally Posted by ElkSlayer91
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
Pointing a firearm at people not attacking you is not covered in any "stand your ground" law.



Pointing a firearm at people criminals, who have destroyed private property (DESTROYED GATE) to GAIN access to PRIVATE PROPERTY(GATED COMMUNITY) not IS attacking you AND "IS" not covered in any "stand your ground" law.

The group, BLM, have already established a precedent proving out they are criminals from the murders and property destruction they have caused.

With that hard fact established, any citizen in that gated community had a right to brandish arms against a criminal gang once they destroyed property to gain access and stepped across the boundary line of the broken gate, because they would legally be within their right to claim in fear of their life, based on the precedent established and present destruction of property at their doorstep, destroyed gate.

The D.A. doesn't have squat.


How many of that violent, criminal, trespassing mob were arrested? How many of these violent felons that violated the property and safety of that community are now facing charges?

None of you get it. The facts don't matter. There is no law and order, because those who control the narrative control the "facts". According to their narrative, those were protesters, and the couple committed a crime. The DA agrees. So who is right and who is wrong, here? Use your fuucking brains, numbskulls.


You are clueless. If by chance the DA got a guilty verdict, it would be thrown out on appeal, and if they didn't, the USSC would.

"He is far from Stupid"

”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”


– DocRocket (In reference to ElkSlayer91)