Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by ChuckKY
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
A sincere argument on your part would refer to the active ingredient, not the animal it might be packaged for in any particular case.



What the FDA states about it. I haven't taken the Covid "shot" either, but find it odd people here won't take it because it has no "FDA" approval, yet rally behind Ivermectin and don't seem to mind the FDA doesn't support it either, rather warns against it.

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consu...use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19

You are not quite right in your bolded statement above. Folks have argued that its not having been approved safe and effective by the FDA classifies it as experimental, therefore to make it a requirement for various activities or modes of employment is violative of the Nuremberg Code.



Did you read the link posted? I claim to know nothing of the "Nuremberg Code". Nor do I acknowledge anyone else here posting does so either.

"FDA has not approved ivermectin for use in treating or preventing COVID-19 in humans." FDA