Originally Posted by RufusG

You're completely wrong, as usual. You continue to compare the cost of inherently not reliable energy with that of historically proven very reliable energy. You just need to stop it before we're back in the 19th century. You ignored everything said in the article.


What, specifically, in that post was wrong, in your opinion?

What, specifically, contradicted the original article, in your opinion?


Sic Semper Tyrannis