It looks like to me the 47 is quite a bit thicker than the 37. The 35 and the 46 seem to be the same. I don’t think it would be lower it would be angled. I think the 47 more closely matches the difference in the bridge heights and would provide a better mount I would think the 35, 37 would give you problems on your elevation limits.
The 35,37 seems to mount scope pointing more away from the barrel and 46,47 is at a minimum level of that makes since.
Ah, I see. I don't have the specs on the 37. If it is not the thickness I said in an earlier post, I would not use it. It would be incorrect. A simple ring alignment tool would verify instantly. Again, people should not be putting on scope mounts and rings if they don not know how to PROPERLY do so. This stuff is definitely not rocket surgery. Especially scope mounting.
