Originally Posted by pete53
Originally Posted by smokepole
So you do think the fact that the bowhunter was not wearing orange is a valid defense for the guy who shot him.

And you think I'm wrong here. Thank goodness the jury didn't agree with you.

i know it was wrong but if you ever sat in on a court case you should be able to understand how lawyers twist the law and words around.

Pete, I've been on four juries and testified in court as an expert witness. And I watched about half of this trial on Webex.

Did you?

Originally Posted by pete53
as far as what he may get for charges he did not get much did he ? it should have been at least 10 years oh that`s right its liberal Colorado the pot state just give him another chance ? discussion with you is over your answers are not >VALID< again! maybe Big Stick can make you understand better or a 2x4 side the head ?

Pete, once again it's not what he "may get," it's what he's already gotten, he's been sentenced. As far as the sentence he got, the trail was in Dolores County. If you knew anything about the case or about Colorado, you'd know that's one of the most solidly red counties in the state.



A wise man is frequently humbled.