I agree free market at work. If the design or faulty manufacture is a risk, a judgement against the company will strongly encourage it to do better quality control or manufacture. Guns made today aren't necessarily manufactured with the same quality parts or quality control as those made 20 years ago. I've heard this mentioned by a few here. I find it sad that an attorney trying to find the facts for his/her client is treated so poorly by folks here, simply because a gun company may or may not bear some liability. If I had a traumatic accident possibly caused by some company's negligence, I would want such an attorney to go to bat for me or my loved ones. I'll bet many here would feel the same way. But then, that would imply that some folks are hypocritical, wouldn't it? Imagine that... What goes around comes around.
