Just a receiver sight on a 300 HH does not meet my way. To each his own on this.
I got my old M70 300 H&H out of the safe to look it over after seeing your rifle. Besides the open irons they come with its sighted with a Leu. 3.5-10 in Burris rings.
It has the original monte carlo stock with a pad.
It seems like a handicap to me to have to use irons on what might be a longer range rifle.
[img:center]
http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/5794/dsc011227te.jpg[/img]
Nice to know you can put a leupold 3.5-10x40 on a pre 64 without it hitting the rear sight. I like looking at all the different configurations (scopes, peeps sights, just irons etc. etc.). Here's my 1951 with a 3-9x40 on it and it does very well. It's one of my most consistently accurate shooting rifles. When I bought it, it came with a redfield rear peep that was very nice but like a bumb a$$ I got rid of it (live and learn). I also found a stock that was in near new condition that someone had put a pachmeyer decelerator recoil pad on and I thought it would be a perfect candidate for a pillar/glass bedding project (one of the reasons the rifle shoots so well I think
). The stock cost me $130.00 out the door which I thought was a good deal at the time. Now it is paired with my 1951 and contrary to my friends opinion I'm pretty happy with it. I also glass bed, sealed and freefloated the barrel channel, threw in a dummy screw and called it good. I wanted to go mcmillan but at the time just didn't have the money for it. Take a look:
The first group I ever shot with the rifle (I knew it was a keeper).
[img]
http://i1180.photobucket.com/albums/x401/chiefbsa/011-6.jpg[/img]
[img]
http://i1180.photobucket.com/albums/x401/chiefbsa/013-5.jpg[/img]
[img]
http://i1180.photobucket.com/albums/x401/chiefbsa/015-5.jpg[/img]
When the wind isn't blowing like a banshee around here it shoots very well