In a nutshell they say 375 outperforms everything else, but 30-06 with heavy bullets is their 2nd choice. First choice if recoil is just too much with the 375. The 300 mag equaled, but did not beat 30-06 at close range. The extra speed is good for longer range, not close range punch apparently.
Wow JMR . . . I finally got around to looking at this "test".
Maybe I missed it . . . (I didn't read it line-by-line) but I could see no reference to the Whelen at all in this document?
Please correct me if I am wrong.Otherwise, I think you are making a gross generalization that cannot be supported by the "test".
The closest I could get to your conclusion was by noting that the 350RemMag didn't do too well (still better than the 300Mag, but the 358 did better). Then I saw that they tested both with 200gr factory ammo. WTF ???
I stopped reading at that point, and concluded the test was conducted by morons.Probably shouldn't cite this one again
