Smokepole
You are reading this initial post incorrectly. You are presuming that you can take a listed BC plunk it into a ballistic program and get 'advertised results'.
I'm presuming nothing, just reading what you wrote. When you say someone else's numbers are "pretty close" you're saying the numbers are good, but could be better.
In other words, you're saying Litz's numbers are close but not right on.
The only way you can know that is if you have better numbers, and that's what your statement implies.
Which is nonsense.
And that BS you were directing at Huntsman has nothing to do with it. I just think you're FOS.
