'flave,
My take is,that there are wayyyyyyyy more "mainstay" MK2/3 mags in service,than the initial(MK I) or '45 variants. MK I's were sorta fickle and MK2/3's in "standard" frames,fhuqking AMAZINGLY spectacular in their rugged reliability(even in all my AMT's). Once the 22/45's arrived,mag quality took a dive and they rate verification as per easch(though I did same in the prior Generations). Hint.
The TK mag extensions are nothing but trouble. In THE Day,OEM Ruger MK2/3 mags were nothing less than sensational. They SET the bar and nothing else was even close. Hint.
Coming full circle and regardless who Brands said mag,I simply number same and cull without remorse. That being said,I don't do polymer bullschit. Hint.
Having been through literally 100's of mags,I'm comfy in what made the cut. I'm not programmed to fhuqk around. Hint...............
Yeah I think the mags in those different iterations were definitely a problem.
I kinda gave up on the platform because of it.
