Home
http://www.breitbart.com/california...tm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
Will it take out southern Cali.
Damn! I hope everybody gets out in time.

Had to laugh at one of the comments......

"Patch the holes with love and multiculturalism"
[Linked Image]
Pound sand.
Originally Posted by stevelyn
[Linked Image]
officials initially assured the public that evacuations would not be necessary, because the damage to the normal spillway appeared limited. They repeated those assurances on Saturday as the emergency spillway was used for the first time since the dam’s construction in 1968.

Now, however, local ABC News affiliate KRCR reports that state officials warn

I'm shocked to my very heart and soul that the "Officials" could not be trusted,.....

Anyhow,...OBEY OFFICIALS, it's the California way

kidding aside, prayers for those in harms way.

....a POX on politically motivated "Officials", and their puppet masters, as well.

GTC
Oroville is in Northern California!!! A lot of farmers around there. Rice, walnuts, almonds, etc. Not to mention innocent children.

Pretty ignorant statement "Well Bye".
[b][color:#3333FF]Live Coverage[/color][/b] .

Maybe it'll wash a few Million libs out of Sacramento and San Fran to the sea..
Prayers for the folks out there from N.C.
Hope RCBS stays safe and dry.
Wholly insensitive, but appropriate.

As much as I despise the politics of Liberal Californians, I pray there will be no loss of life with this disaster.

Mother Nature can be a real bitch.

Ed
Shows once again just how ill-prepared the government is to engineer and maintain something as basic as a dam.
When it breaches and causes loss of life and property I'm sure "climate change" will be at the heart of the cause.
Never mind democrats in charge of the State most likely didn't maintain its structural integrity.
Good luck to 'em.
Originally Posted by bigwhoop
Shows once again just how ill-prepared the government is to engineer and maintain something as basic as a dam.
When it breaches and causes loss of life and property I'm sure "climate change" will be at the heart of the cause.
Never mind democrats in charge of the State most likely didn't maintain its structural integrity.
Good luck to 'em.

Global Warming legislation is being drawn up in Sacramento as we speak, you can bet on that..
Originally Posted by bigwhoop
Shows once again just how ill-prepared the government is to engineer and maintain something as basic as a dam.
When it breaches and causes loss of life and property I'm sure "climate change" will be at the heart of the cause.
Never mind democrats in charge of the State most likely didn't maintain its structural integrity.
Good luck to 'em.


Look pal, they got high-speed cho-choo trains to Bakersfield to build, ya know!
Ha! Hopefully they increase the carbon tax and catch all those leaving town burning fossil fuel.
Maybe i am missing something but why did they not repair the damaged spillway when they diverted the water to the other one.

They have ways to make concrete set very fast.

Hope no one gets hurt.
Poor Cali, they can't catch a break. Its either too hot, too cold, too dry, too wet, too much mud, too much fire and too much San Andreas activity. Just not enough illegals to vote in more democrats.
Originally Posted by plainsman456
Maybe i am missing something but why did they not repair the damaged spillway when they diverted the water to the other one.

They have ways to make concrete set very fast.

Hope no one gets hurt.


This will be a colossal mis-management that will result in loss of life, property and numerous "class action" lawsuits.
That sinkhole in the main spillway isn't a crater from a bomb hit, it's a COLLAPSE of the sub-grade. For a collapse of that scale to transpire, there has to be a LOT of water making it's way from out from under that dam already,....DEEP underneath.

The implications of a potential "blowout" right down at or below the reservoirs bottom are not at all good IMHO.

GTC



They better get Peelosi, Maxine Waters and Feinstein out there to start filling sandbags.
This will end up being a "dam version" of a nuclear meltdown.
Originally Posted by plainsman456
Maybe i am missing something but why did they not repair the damaged spillway when they diverted the water to the other one.

They have ways to make concrete set very fast.

Hope no one gets hurt.


You definitely ARE missing something, both spillways are running a raging torrent,....you have concrete that'll "set" under that ?

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
officials initially assured the public that evacuations would not be necessary, because the damage to the normal spillway appeared limited. They repeated those assurances on Saturday as the emergency spillway was used for the first time since the dam’s construction in 1968.

Now, however, local ABC News affiliate KRCR reports that state officials warn

I'm shocked to my very heart and soul that the "Officials" could not be trusted,.....

Anyhow,...OBEY OFFICIALS, it's the California way

kidding aside, prayers for those in harms way.

....a POX on politically motivated "Officials", and their puppet masters, as well.

GTC


I think the spillway was in good shape until the water started to spill over and erode the base away. First time the spillway had ever been used.
Originally Posted by Barkoff
First time the spillway had ever been used.

I hope CA kept the original sales receipt..
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by plainsman456
Maybe i am missing something but why did they not repair the damaged spillway when they diverted the water to the other one.

They have ways to make concrete set very fast.

Hope no one gets hurt.


You definitely ARE missing something, both spillways are running a raging torrent,....you have concrete that'll "set" under that ?

GTC


You be missing something too. They completely shut off the main spillway yesterday to inspect the damage. I suppose that's when he is talking about.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
That sinkhole in the main spillway isn't a crater from a bomb hit, it's a COLLAPSE of the sub-grade. For a collapse of that scale to transpire, there has to be a LOT of water making it's way from out from under that dam already,....DEEP underneath.

The implications of a potential "blowout" right down at or below the reservoirs bottom are not at all good IMHO.

GTC





The least of which is the immediate aftermath, an entire regions water supply sits behind that dam. Implications are dire in a worst case scenario.
Sounds like a good time for Trump to negotiate that sanctuary thingy.....
Read about the Johnstown flood. It will put these things in perspective.

Quote
Johnstown Flood
From Wikipedia,
The Johnstown Flood (locally, the Great Flood of 1889) occurred on May 31, 1889, after the catastrophic failure of the South Fork Dam on the Little Conemaugh River 14 miles (23 km) upstream of the town of Johnstown, Pennsylvania. The dam broke after several days of extremely heavy rainfall, releasing 20 million tons (18 million cubic meters) of water from the reservoir known as Lake Conemaugh. With a volumetric flow rate that temporarily equalled that of the Mississippi River,[2] the flood killed 2,209 people[3] and caused US$17 million of damage (about $450 million in 2015 dollars).


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnstown_Flood
I think the spillway was in good shape until the water started to spill over and erode the base away. First time the spillway had ever been used.

Translation to non P.C. American English,
....The spillway was a poorly built product of lousy engineering, a true POS.
It's bloody well not the first time we've seen this kinda' rodeo, either.
Leaves me thinking back to the collapse of the freeway in Oakland, and wondering how much re-bar money went into the pockets of the pols, v. the actual concrete that's now failed.

GTC
News updates are calling the situation as being "uncontrollable". Looks like Mother Nature may win another one.

Inundation map:

[Linked Image]
From what I've read and seen video of, replacing the spillway isn't going to be a quick patch job, more like years of work and huge money. If the entire dam lets go, it could end up being one of the biggest disasters in modern history.
Originally Posted by Kodiakisland
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by plainsman456
Maybe i am missing something but why did they not repair the damaged spillway when they diverted the water to the other one.

They have ways to make concrete set very fast.

Hope no one gets hurt.


You definitely ARE missing something, both spillways are running a raging torrent,....you have concrete that'll "set" under that ?

GTC


You be missing something too. They completely shut off the main spillway yesterday to inspect the damage. I suppose that's when he is talking about.



Not a civil engineer, but guessing that any new concrete that would have been poured would have scoured away in minutes. Massive quantities of fast water is pretty powerful stuff.
Progression map:
[Linked Image]
Cross,what i am getting at is the damage did not happen overnight.

It had to be going on for a while before they found it.

The way the so-called news read was that they had shut down the regular spillway down because of fears that it would wash out.

Just seems to me that if they did shut it down some type of damage control could have been done.
That's all.
Quote
First time it's been used?


What? Never a test run?
Quote

The least of which is the immediate aftermath, an entire regions water supply sits behind that dam. Implications are dire in a worst case scenario.


Are you under the impression that a fleet of heavy skycranes, the buckets from which to airdrop that much concrete, and that much concrete are kept somewhere, "Just in case ?".

Get real, this is COMPLETELY indefensible.

GTC
I can imagine the level of finger pointing will be "big league". Certainly it will be blamed on some level of Republican intransigence to deny proper funding for upkeep and repair.
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by Kodiakisland
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by plainsman456
Maybe i am missing something but why did they not repair the damaged spillway when they diverted the water to the other one.

They have ways to make concrete set very fast.

Hope no one gets hurt.


You definitely ARE missing something, both spillways are running a raging torrent,....you have concrete that'll "set" under that ?

GTC


You be missing something too. They completely shut off the main spillway yesterday to inspect the damage. I suppose that's when he is talking about.



Not a civil engineer, but guessing that any new concrete that would have been poured would have scoured away in minutes. Massive quantities of fast water is pretty powerful stuff.


I'm not saying they could have patched it. Just that yesterday it was completely shut off. No water was coming down it. The pictures I saw showed severe erosion underneath it, along the sides of it, and a hole you could have put several dump trucks in.
Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
Originally Posted by Barkoff
First time the spillway had ever been used.

I hope CA kept the original sales receipt..


It's not going to fail, they have been predicting within the hour for the last three hours..they are just CYA
Originally Posted by 1minute
Quote
First time it's been used?


What? Never a test run?


It's the emergency spillway. The one you have but never expect to use. This is the first time the water has been high enough to go over it.
Originally Posted by 1minute
Quote
First time it's been used?


What? Never a test run?


Water has never got high enough, it's not a water release, it's an overflow.
Well good luck to 'em, its time to sign off.
Im sure the bureaucrats in charge of its maintenance and its saliency to prevent a crisis of this magnitude squandered and pilferred for self service.

[bleep] happens, but it seems like liberal rule is downright dangerous. It reminds one of New Orleans...

I hope of no loss of life, just that blame and repercussions might finally effect the asswholes who foment this [bleep]; but I'll bet it gets "washed away".....
Originally Posted by plainsman456
Cross,what i am getting at is the damage did not happen overnight.

It had to be going on for a while before they found it.

The way the so-called news read was that they had shut down the regular spillway down because of fears that it would wash out.

Just seems to me that if they did shut it down some type of damage control could have been done.
That's all.


They'll TRY to keep this under wraps, but I'll predict not that what actually appears on the original prints for that spillway for mat and grid rebar and wire denstity is NOT what they are going to find,....this kinda' schiddt's been ENDEMIC in that state,....

Well organized graft, theft, and abuse with ties right to the very top in most cases.

GTC
Let the salmon run!

Not interested in anyone getting fugged up. Head for higher ground - vote right.
This is a picture of the main spillway yesterday. Not the emergency spillway that is predicted to fail. They closed the main spillway which allowed more water over the emergency spillway that is eroding it's base. This image is actually reversed for some reason.

[Linked Image]

Another look that better shows the size of the spillway:

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote

The least of which is the immediate aftermath, an entire regions water supply sits behind that dam. Implications are dire in a worst case scenario.


Are you under the impression that a fleet of heavy skycranes, the buckets from which to airdrop that much concrete, and that much concrete are kept somewhere, "Just in case ?".

Get real, this is COMPLETELY indefensible.

GTC


I have no idea where you get that from, but no that is not even close to my impression. My post was pointing to the long term implications of an entire region void of a reliable water supply should a catastrophic failure occur.
Oh no not the liberal utopia!
The era of its construction was not good for earthen dams...


Teton_Dam
The Teton Dam was an earthen dam on the Teton River in Idaho, United States. It was built by the Bureau of Reclamation, one of eight federal agencies authorized to construct dams.[3] Located in the eastern part of the state, between Fremont and Madison counties, it suffered a catastrophic failure on June 5, 1976, as it was filling for the first time.

The collapse of the dam resulted in the deaths of 11 people[4] and 13,000 cattle. The dam cost about $100 million to build, and the federal government paid over $300 million in claims related to its failure. Total damage estimates have ranged up to $2 billion.[5] The dam has not been rebuilt.

Contents [hide]
1 History and geology
2 Filling
3 Collapse and flood
4 Cause
5 Deaths, damage and property claims
6 References
7 External links
History and geology[edit]
There had been interest in building a dam in the eastern Snake River Plain for many years to control spring runoff and provide a more constant water supply in the summer. The area had suffered a severe drought in 1961, followed by serious flooding in 1962. The Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) proposed the Teton Dam in 1963, and Congress passed without opposition an authorizing bill the following year. The planned dam was to be an earthen structure 310 feet (94 m) high and 0.6 miles (1.0 km) long and create a reservoir 17 miles (27 km) in length. The impounded water would be used to generate hydroelectric power. An environmental impact statement was issued for the dam in 1971, but it did not raise the possibility of a collapse.[3]

The primary contractor for the dam was Morrison-Knudsen Co. of Boise, assisted by Peter Kiewit Sons Co. of Omaha, Nebraska. The $39 million contract was awarded in December 1971 and work began in 1972.[1]

The eastern Snake River Plain is almost entirely underlain by basalt erupted from large shield volcanos on top of rhyolitic ash-flow tuff and ignimbrites.[6] The tuff, a late-Cenozoic volcanic rock is 1.9 million years old. The dam site is composed of basalt and rhyolite, both of which are considered unsuitable for dam construction because of their high permeability. This was confirmed by long term pump-in tests at rates of 165 to 460 US gallons (620 to 1,740 litres) per minute.[7] Test cores, drilled by engineers and geologists employed by the Bureau of Reclamation, showed that the rock at the dam site is highly fissured and unstable, particularly on the right side of the canyon. The widest fissures were determined to be 1.7 inches (4.3 cm) wide. The Bureau planned to seal these fissures by injecting grout into the rock under high pressure to create a grout curtain in the rock.

In addition, an investigation of the area by geologists of the U.S. Geologic Survey indicated that it was seismically active: five earthquakes had occurred within 30 miles (50 km) of the dam site in the previous five years, two of which had been of significant magnitude. This information was provided to the Bureau of Reclamation in a memorandum, but the geologists' concerns were considerably watered down in the six-month re-drafting process before the USGS sent the final version of the memo to the USBR in July 1973.[3]

In 1973, when the dam was only half-built, but almost $5 million had already been spent on the project, large open fissures were encountered during excavation of the key trench near the right end of the dam, about 700 feet (210 m) from the canyon wall. The two largest, near-vertical fissures trend generally east-west and extend more than 100 feet (30 m) below the bottom of the key trench. Some of the fissures are lined by calcite, and rubble fills others. Several voids, as much as 6 inches (15 cm) wide, were encountered 60 to 85 feet (18 to 26 m) below the ground surface beyond the right end of the dam and grout curtain.[7] The largest fissures were actually enterable caves. One of them was eleven feet (3.4 m) wide and a hundred feet (30 m) long. Another one was nine feet (2.7 m) wide in places and 190 feet (60 m) long. These were not grouted because they were beyond the keyway trench and beyond the area where the Bureau had decided grouting was required.[8] This necessitated using twice as much grouting as had been originally anticipated – 118,000 linear feet were used in total. Later, the report of a committee of the House of Representatives which investigated the dam's collapse felt that the discovery of the caves should have been sufficient for the Bureau of Reclamation to doubt its ability to fill them in with grout, but this did not happen: the Bureau continued to insist, even after the dam had failed, that the grouting was appropriate.[3]

Filling[edit]
The dam was completed in November 1975, and filling the reservoir began at the standard rate of 1 foot (0.30 m) a day. However, snows were heavy that winter, and five months later the project's construction engineer requested permission to double the filling rate in order to deal with the additional spring run-off, while continuing to inspect for leaks and monitor the groundwater. A month later, even though monitoring showed that groundwater was flowing a thousand times faster than had been originally anticipated, the filling rate was doubled again, to 4 feet (1.2 m) a day.[3]

On June 3 and 4, 1976, three small springs were discovered downstream of the dam, although the water running through the leaks was clear, and such leaks are not unexpected for an earthen dam. At the time, the reservoir was almost at capacity, with a maximum depth of 240 feet (73 m). The only structure that had been initially prepared for releasing water was the emergency outlet works, which could carry just 850 cubic feet per second (24 m3/s). The main outlet works and spillway gates were not yet in service: the gates were cordoned off by steel walls while they were being painted.

Collapse and flood[edit]
Breach of Teton Dam, June 5, 1976

The dark brown streak on the dam face near the gray bedrock in the left half of the photo is a leak that formed on the morning of June 5. The speck above the leak near the top of the dam is a D-9 bulldozer that is heading down to the leak to push dirt into it.


Large amounts of mud are now spilling down the face of the dam, unchecked by the efforts of the bulldozer operators. The outlet works at the foot of the dam are flooding with muddy water.


The dam is now breached and muddy water flows violently over the dam face.


The breach has now widened to nearly its full extent. The outlet works are completely inundated with muddy water.
On Saturday, June 5, 1976, at 7:30 a.m. Mountain Daylight Time (MDT), a muddy leak appeared, suggesting sediment was in the water, but engineers did not believe there was a problem. By 9:30 a.m. the downstream face of the dam had developed a wet spot which began to discharge water at 20 to 30 cubic feet per second (0.57 to 0.85 m3/s) and the embankment material began to wash out. Crews with bulldozers were sent to plug the leak, but were unsuccessful. Local media appeared at the site, and at 11:15 officials told the county sheriff's office to evacuate downstream residents. Work crews were forced to flee on foot as the widening gap, now larger than a swimming pool, swallowed their equipment. The operators of two bulldozers caught in the eroding embankment were pulled to safety with ropes.

At 11:55 a.m. MDT (UTC-17:55), the crest of the dam sagged and collapsed into the reservoir; two minutes later the remainder of the right-bank third of the main dam wall disintegrated. Over 2,000,000 cubic feet per second (57,000 m3/s) of sediment-filled water emptied through the breach into the remaining 6 miles (10 km) of the Teton River canyon, after which the flood spread out and shallowed on the Snake River Plain. By 8:00 p.m. that evening, the reservoir had completely emptied, although over two-thirds of the dam wall remained standing.

Cause[edit]
Study of the dam's environment and structure[9] placed blame for the collapse on the permeable loess soil used in the core and on fissured (cracked) rhyolite in the abutments of the dam that allowed water to seep around and through the earth fill dam. The permeable loess was found to be cracked. It is postulated that the combination of these flaws allowed water to seep through the dam and led to internal erosion, called piping, that eventually caused the dam's collapse.

An investigating panel had quickly identified piping as the most probable cause of the failure, then focused its efforts on determining how the piping started. Two mechanisms were possible. The first was the flow of water under highly erodible and unprotected fill, through joints in unsealed rock beneath the grout cap, and development of an erosion tunnel. The second was "cracking caused by differential strains or hydraulic fracturing of the core material." The panel was unable to determine whether one or the other mechanism occurred, or a combination:

The fundamental cause of failure may be regarded as a combination of geological factors and design decisions that, taken together, permitted the failure to develop.

A wide-ranging controversy ensued from the dam's collapse. According to the Bureau of Reclamation, BOR engineers assess all Reclamation dams under strict criteria established by the Safety of Dams program. Each structure is periodically reviewed for resistance to seismic stability, internal faults and physical deterioration.[4] The dam safety program identified two other dangerous dams – Fontenelle, which very nearly failed like the Teton Dam when it was filled and again in May 1985 and the Jackson Lake Dam which would have failed during an earthquake on the nearby Teton Fault.

Deaths, damage and property claims[edit]

Teton Dam ruins in 2004
Teton Canyon ends approximately six miles below the dam site, where the river flows onto the Snake River Plain. When the dam failed, the flood struck several communities immediately downstream, particularly Wilford at the terminus of the canyon, Sugar City, Salem, Hibbard, and Rexburg. Thousands of homes and businesses were destroyed. The small agricultural communities of Wilford and Sugar City were wiped from the river bank. Five of the fourteen deaths attributed to the flood occurred in Wilford. The similar community of Teton, on the south bank of the river, is on a modest bench and was largely spared.[10] One Teton resident was fishing on the river at the time of the dam failure and was drowned. An elderly woman living in the city of Teton died as a result of the evacuation.[11]

One estimate placed damage to Hibbard and Rexburg area, with a population of about 10,000, at 80 percent of existing structures. The Teton River flows through the industrial, commercial and residential districts of north Rexburg. A significant reason for the massive damage in the community was the location of a lumber yard directly upstream. When the flood waters hit, thousands of logs were washed into town. Dozens of them hit a bulk gasoline storage tank a few hundred yards away. The gasoline ignited and sent flaming slicks adrift on the racing water.[12] The force of the logs and cut lumber, and the subsequent fires, practically destroyed the city.

The flood waters traveled west along the route of the Henry's fork of the Snake River, around both sides of the Menan Buttes, significantly damaging the community of Roberts. The city of Idaho Falls, even further down on the flood plain, had time to prepare. At the older American Falls Dam downstream, engineers increased discharge by less than 5% before the flood arrived.[13] That dam held, and the flood was effectively over, but tens of thousands of acres of land near the river were stripped of fertile topsoil.[5]

The force of the failure destroyed the lower part of the Teton River, washing away riparian zones and reducing the canyon walls. This seriously damaged the stream's ecology and impacted the native Yellowstone cutthroat trout population. The force of the water and excessive sediment also damaged stream habitat in the Snake River and some tributaries, as far downstream as the Fort Hall bottoms.

After the dam's collapse, debris clean-up began immediately and took the remainder of the summer. Rebuilding of damaged property continued for several years. Within a week after the disaster, President Gerald Ford requested a $200 million appropriation for initial payments for damages, without assigning responsibility for Teton Dam’s failure.[14]

The Bureau of Reclamation set up claims offices in Rexburg, Idaho Falls, and Blackfoot. By January 4, 1977, disaster victims filed over 4,800 claims totalling $194 million. By that date, the federal government paid 3,813 of those claims, $93.5 million. Originally scheduled to end in July 1978, the claims program continued into the 1980s. At the end of the claims program in January 1987, the federal government had paid 7,563 claims for a total amount of $322 million.

No plans have been made for rebuilding the Teton Dam, but its reconstruction has been brought up on at least one occasion.[citation needed]
link to wiki above...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teton_Dam
Perhaps the link would have been enough. Now I gotta scroll past that schit every time I click on this thread. grin
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
That sinkhole in the main spillway isn't a crater from a bomb hit, it's a COLLAPSE of the sub-grade. For a collapse of that scale to transpire, there has to be a LOT of water making it's way from out from under that dam already,....DEEP underneath.

The implications of a potential "blowout" right down at or below the reservoirs bottom are not at all good IMHO.

GTC





might have been some cavitation in the flow, micro bubbles of vapor forming and collapsing that create roughness in a spot, progressively eats away at the concrete. Not unheard of in large dam spillways. look up water hammer, cavitation, glen canyon dam.

from wiki tonight:

Quote
2017 spillway failure
Partial view of the spillway structure next to Oroville Dam with the main service spillway (right) and emergency spillway (left) (2008)

On February 7, 2017, during ongoing flood control release of about 50,000 cubic feet per second (1,400 m3/s), a crater appeared in the Oroville Dam spillway.[22] High inflows to Lake Oroville forced dam operators to continue using the damaged spillway, and measures were taken to prepare the emergency spillway – officially known as the auxiliary spillway – for use for the first time. Power transmission lines were moved, and workers began clear-cutting trees on the hillside below the emergency spillway. [23] Meanwhile, debris from the crater in the main spillway was carried downstream, and caused damage to a nearby fish hatchery due to high turbidity. State workers began evacuating fish and eggs from the hatchery in an attempt to lessen damage.[24] By February 10, the spillway hole had grown to 300 feet (91 m) wide, 500 feet (150 m) long and 45 feet (14 m) deep.[25]

Although engineers had hoped that using the damaged spillway could drain the lake enough to avoid use of the emergency spillway,[26] they were forced to reduce its discharge from 65,000 cu ft/s (1,800 m3/s) to 55,000 cu ft/s (1,600 m3/s) due to potential damage to power lines.[27][28] Shortly after 8:00 am on February 11, 2017, the emergency spillway began carrying water for the first time since the dam's construction in 1968.[29] Because the spillway is a separate structure from the dam, there was no danger of the main embankment being breached, and evacuation of Oroville itself was not considered at that time, as officials stated that there was no threat to public safety. However, once the lake rose to the level of the emergency spillway, an uncontrolled overflow that topped out at 12,600 cu ft/s (360 m3/s)[30][31] began, and water flowed directly onto the hillside below the concrete crest of the emergency spillway.

On February 12, 2017, evacuation was ordered for those in low-lying levels of Oroville, due to an anticipated failure of the auxiliary spillway.[32] A failure of the concrete top of the spillway would allow up to 30 vertical feet of Lake Oroville through the gap in an uncontrolled deluge. The flow over the main spillway was increased to 100,000 cubic feet per second (2,800 m3/s) to try to slow the erosion of the emergency spillway.[33]


Originally Posted by bigwhoop
Progression map:
[Linked Image]


where you getting these?
Couple of points here.
The area in question is in Northern CA, and is as conservative a place as there is. Logging and lumber country, till the greenies decimated that industry, and this region. They don't need any more problems.
The "emergency spillway" that is failing is the "rim of the bathtub" The bathtub is overflowing.
The concrete spillway that failed earlier in the week is not the one that we are concerned about today. The only reason that the concrete spillway is relevant, is that flows were throttled back to prevent erosion adjacent to the failed spillway.
Difficult to test the emergency spillway, as it would take 900+ feet of water to get to it.
As to repairing the concrete spillway, the lake is dumping 65,000 CFS of water, or very close to 30,000,000 gallons per minute. That makes for a tough band aid.
Originally Posted by hatari
Read about the Johnstown flood. It will put these things in perspective.

Quote
Johnstown Flood
From Wikipedia,
The Johnstown Flood (locally, the Great Flood of 1889) occurred on May 31, 1889, after the catastrophic failure of the South Fork Dam on the Little Conemaugh River 14 miles (23 km) upstream of the town of Johnstown, Pennsylvania. The dam broke after several days of extremely heavy rainfall, releasing 20 million tons (18 million cubic meters) of water from the reservoir known as Lake Conemaugh. With a volumetric flow rate that temporarily equalled that of the Mississippi River,[2] the flood killed 2,209 people[3] and caused US$17 million of damage (about $450 million in 2015 dollars).


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnstown_Flood


Toured that in high school while there for a national envirithon competition. I was impressed by it then and still am today.
Originally Posted by heavywalker
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote

The least of which is the immediate aftermath, an entire regions water supply sits behind that dam. Implications are dire in a worst case scenario.


Are you under the impression that a fleet of heavy skycranes, the buckets from which to airdrop that much concrete, and that much concrete are kept somewhere, "Just in case ?".

Get real, this is COMPLETELY indefensible.

GTC


I have no idea where you get that from, but no that is not even close to my impression. My post was pointing to the long term implications of an entire region void of a reliable water supply should a catastrophic failure occur.


I have no idea where you got the idea I was addressing you,....I wasn't.

GTC
Gov. Moonbeam will fly Phil Swift in with some Flex Seal, not a problem.
I assume that California will ask for an emergency declaration from the Trump administration that will provide federal dollars to help with repairs.
lol that's typically why people quote a post but looking back I get it now. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
There are a lot of innocents who are going to have their lives turned upside down. I hate that Americans are being put through this.
Not to sound insensitive, but from my perch here in North Central Wyoming , I say, Huh and move on to local news. I agree that California is in some trouble, and they do never seem to have the right amount of moisture or anything else....but ,What can I do that the Engineers in charge should have done.
I was talking to a friend today and he said to also watch Shasta Lake. He said that it was about 30' above "full".
Originally Posted by heavywalker
lol that's typically why people quote a post but looking back I get it now. Sorry for the misunderstanding.


No harm no foul, just saving a little bandwidth and using the "reply function" instead of "stacking it like cordwood".

Greg
Originally Posted by logger
I assume that California will ask for an emergency declaration from the Trump administration that will provide federal dollars to help with repairs.


And he can tell them to get with the program on immigration or pound sand. That's what some are saying. Harsh, but defying the feds has consequences right?
Originally Posted by Fireball2
Originally Posted by logger
I assume that California will ask for an emergency declaration from the Trump administration that will provide federal dollars to help with repairs.


And he can tell them to get with the program on immigration or pound sand. That's what some are saying. Harsh, but defying the feds has consequences right?


It should...
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by plainsman456
Cross,what i am getting at is the damage did not happen overnight.

It had to be going on for a while before they found it.

The way the so-called news read was that they had shut down the regular spillway down because of fears that it would wash out.

Just seems to me that if they did shut it down some type of damage control could have been done.
That's all.


They'll TRY to keep this under wraps, but I'll predict not that what actually appears on the original prints for that spillway for mat and grid rebar and wire denstity is NOT what they are going to find,....this kinda' schiddt's been ENDEMIC in that state,....

Well organized graft, theft, and abuse with ties right to the very top in most cases.

GTC


Reagan was the governor when this dam was finished.

Sycamore
Quote
The era of its construction was not good for earthen dams...


You got that dead straight!....and by the mid to late 80s we were madly scrambling to keep up with the incipient failures of the damned things, which had been scattered around like a mad woman's schiddt on both sides of the Medicine Line. You would not BELIEVE the miserable pile of mud they had protecting the town of Canmore Alta.

Ya' cant teach these "Civil Engineers" jack, ...by the late 80s they actually thought that they were going to modify the path of the "Mighty Bow",...and proceeded to try......that lasted, what, less than 25 years, and the whole bloody mess washed away ?

GTC

Quote
Reagan was the governor when this dam was finished.


Thanks, Syc,....I'll remember to cast an evil glance at his signed pic on my wall when I walk past this evening,

....azzwhole

GTC
My daughter is evacuating. She just called wanting advice.
I am worried.
Here, they are looking at the "Pebble Mine" disaster in waiting... they want to build a dam encompassing three mountains for a "settling pond" which will make the Seven Gorges Dam either the second third or fourth biggest dam in the World, depending on how you count it.

But the Pebble deal will be built on 3,500' of tundra sponge... no way it could undercut, right?

But enganeers done figgered it out and plan to dewater an area bigger than several states down to that 3500' depth so it will squash down in there nicely. Of course there are a number of World Class rainbow fisheries there that will be completely dewatered in the process, but what could that hurt, right?

The Teton washout is exactly what I predict will happen if they decide to pull that stunt...
Originally Posted by logger
I assume that California will ask for an emergency declaration from the Trump administration that will provide federal dollars to help with repairs.


I'd love to see that. The idiot sycophants haven't lifted the drought emergency yet.....
My daughter is a few miles north, in Chico. That;s where the are sending evacuees.
Originally Posted by dale06
My daughter is evacuating. She just called wanting advice.
I am worried.


Tell her ain't nothing physical worth dying for and get on the road to high ground, stat!
[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
Reagan was the governor when this dam was finished.


Thanks, Syc,....I'll remember to cast an evil glance on the signed pic on my wall when I walk past this evening,

....azzwhole

GTC


you were the one beaking off about graft and corruption going straight to the top.

you can get $22 for the pic on ebay, if you run low on hooch.

Sycamore
Originally Posted by Steve
[Linked Image]


thanks, that pic helps show what is going on.

Sycamore
KCRA Live
Just said tens of thousands are evacuating, yet coverage sounds encouraging,,,as always before maybe disasters.

https://youtu.be/cdOGPBnfoKE
Originally Posted by dale06
My daughter is evacuating. She just called wanting advice.
I am worried.


We can put her up for the night if she needs somewhere to go.



Dam.




Travis
the difference here is the Teton Dam failed from within the actual fill/ There was seepage along one abutment, saturation of the fill, and the ds face of the dam gave way.

Oroville Dam has an auxiliary spillway problem. I have read worst case scenario (which is pretty bad) thirty feet deep breach may form to bedrock. losing 30 feet of water off the top of that reservoir is going to be a lot of water downstream.

Nothing like losing the 700 feet of the main embankment.

Sycamore
Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
[b][color:#3333FF]Live Coverage[/color][/b] .

Maybe it'll wash a few Million libs out of Sacramento and San Fran to the sea..

Need to study your geography. That area is Californias heartland. The liberals are in San Francisco and Los Angeles and will likely not have any effect.
Originally Posted by logger
I assume that California will ask for an emergency declaration from the Trump administration that will provide federal dollars to help with repairs.

Trump will deny, as Moonbeam will want to use mojado labor.
Might get them off the welfare rolls, though.
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by plainsman456
Cross,what i am getting at is the damage did not happen overnight.

It had to be going on for a while before they found it.

The way the so-called news read was that they had shut down the regular spillway down because of fears that it would wash out.

Just seems to me that if they did shut it down some type of damage control could have been done.
That's all.


They'll TRY to keep this under wraps, but I'll predict not that what actually appears on the original prints for that spillway for mat and grid rebar and wire denstity is NOT what they are going to find,....this kinda' schiddt's been ENDEMIC in that state,....

Well organized graft, theft, and abuse with ties right to the very top in most cases.

GTC


Reagan was the governor when this dam was finished.

Sycamore


And it was under construction for how many years before he took office. The dam was fully operational in 1968 1 year into his term.

You really are a disingenuous bastard aren't you? ESAD
Yep, looks bad for the 16k folks in Oroville, my friends and their kids are evacuating north with the rest of the evacuation. My Nephew from Sac county Rangers district is being sent to Oroville to assist the evacuation, and I suspect keep an eye on the vacant houses, Cal fire is also deploying there, not sure what their duties will be.

I am far enough south the water effects won't get here for several days, we are still recovering from last week's rain. Our ground is saturated, most of the local dry canals have overflowed into our Vineyards and wheat fields. Another day or so and the water should stop flowing "downhill", being at the lowest point is bad. Highway 99 south of Sacramento has been partially closed due to floodwater.

I visited Pardee dam today. From a relative who works for EBMUD who control the flows, it was 3' above overflow stage yesterday and 1.5' today and they expect it to drop below the spillway tomorrow, but thursday another 2 or 3 day storm is expected.

Oroville actually has the destinction, maybe overtaken by SF now, but they were the Welfare hub of northern California 6+ years ago, the last time I visited Buzz and the staff at Huntington's store.
It's time to saddle the horses and get the hell outa Dodge!! Just doesn't pay to live in low lying areas! Ask the good ole boys in South Louisiana about that!!
Originally Posted by smarquez
Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
[b][color:#3333FF]Live Coverage[/color][/b] .

Maybe it'll wash a few Million libs out of Sacramento and San Fran to the sea..

Need to study your geography. That area is Californias heartland. The liberals are in San Francisco and Los Angeles and will likely not have any effect.


Geography and political studies for all... No liberals in Sacramento? Seriously?
Originally Posted by 12344mag
Damn! I hope everybody gets out in time.

Had to laugh at one of the comments......

"Patch the holes with love and multiculturalism"


Oh ye of little faith ! whistle
Quote
Reagan was the governor when this dam was finished.

Sycamore


Quote

And it was under construction for how many years before he took office. The dam was fully operational in 1968 1 year into his term.

You really are a disingenuous bastard aren't you? ESAD


He's damned sure not one to EVER pass up the opportunity for a cheap shot.
Parrot, too,....I taught him to say "Beaking Off" years ago.
.....'nother dumb bird, that's all.

GTC
A friend with family beating feet out of Oroville are stuck in a traffic jam,....as of about 1/2 hour ago.

GTC
Originally Posted by logger
I was talking to a friend today and he said to also watch Shasta Lake. He said that it was about 30' above "full".

My wife's cousin lives in Redding and we were there last week. Just after we left last Tuesday they got hit by a warm rain that washed a lot of the snow down. This morning he said Shasta is full and they are releasing water. He didn't seem to have any concerns right now.
Originally Posted by smarquez
Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
[b][color:#3333FF]Live Coverage[/color][/b] .

Maybe it'll wash a few Million libs out of Sacramento and San Fran to the sea..

Need to study your geography. That area is Californias heartland. The liberals are in San Francisco and Los Angeles and will likely not have any effect.


Agreed. Wishing a catastrophe on ANY US population is childish, in bad taste, and shows one's true colors. But beyond that, Deerwhacker's comments shows extreme ignorance.

I was born and raised 30 minutes north in Chico, Ca. Let me tell you what's in the path of a potential flood:

- Some of the richest almond and walnut orchards in the country.
- Some of the most prolific rice fields in the country
- Destruction of Feather River corridor, rich in wildlife and diversity
- Damage to many Northern Sacramento Valley communities (many of those, conservative areas)
- Some of the premier waterfowl stopover habitat in the Pacific flyway, and at least a half dozen critical National Wildlife Refuges plus some of the last decent pheasant habitat in the state
- Loss of property and human life

Quite a few classless replies on this post. Some of 24HCF's bottom feeders are in full force tonight...
Quote
And it was under construction for how many years before he took office. The dam was fully operational in 1968 1 year into his term.

You really are a disingenuous bastard aren't you? ESAD


The Dam is not the problem, the two spillways are.

Do you have any reason to believe the problem was graft and corruption that went straight to the top? Like your buddy Cross?

Infrastructure has been decaying in this country since it was built, most places have money for new stuff, but not for repair, maintenance, or testing.

The simplest explanation is often the correct one. You don't need graft for infrastructure to fail, you just need to not maintain it for 40-50 years.

Sycamore





RCBS address sounds like they are right in the middle of this

RCBS
605 Oro Dam Boulevard East
Oroville, CA 95965
Originally Posted by duck911


Agreed. Wishing a catastrophe on ANY US population is childish, in bad taste, and shows one's true colors. But beyond that, Deerwhacker's comments shows extreme ignorance.

I was born and raised 30 minutes north in Chico, Ca. Let me tell you what's in the path of a potential flood:

- Some of the richest almond and walnut orchards in the country.
- Some of the most prolific rice fields in the country
- Destruction of Feather River corridor, rich in wildlife and diversity
- Damage to many Northern Sacramento Valley communities (many of those, conservative areas)
- Some of the premier waterfowl stopover habitat in the Pacific flyway, and at least a half dozen critical National Wildlife Refuges plus some of the last decent pheasant habitat in the state
- Loss of property and human life

Quite a few classless replies on this post. Some of 24HCF's bottom feeders are in full force tonight...


+1
I'm no fan of California, but I also hate to see people's lives ruined or lost at the expense of the idiots in charge. Kind of like the fugged up state where I live. I'll keep my fingers crossed for a good outcome.
Oroville is a welfare chithole, the armpit of norcal.

Yuba city and Marysville just down stream aren't much better.

Lake Oroville hasn't flowed over the spillway in years.

They were aware of cracks in the spillway and did nothing to repair them.

My guess is they spent all the money on welfare, illegals and fat pensions for government workers.

Now moonbeam Brown is asking the fed for assistance, [bleep] em.

Trump is right we have neglected the infrastructure for to long.

Higbean will have a front row seat if it blows.
Originally Posted by hemiallen
Yep, looks bad for the 16k folks in Oroville, my friends and their kids are evacuating north with the rest of the evacuation. My Nephew from Sac county Rangers district is being sent to Oroville to assist the evacuation, and I suspect keep an eye on the vacant houses, Cal fire is also deploying there, not sure what their duties will be.

I am far enough south the water effects won't get here for several days, we are still recovering from last week's rain. Our ground is saturated, most of the local dry canals have overflowed into our Vineyards and wheat fields. Another day or so and the water should stop flowing "downhill", being at the lowest point is bad. Highway 99 south of Sacramento has been partially closed due to floodwater.

I visited Pardee dam today. From a relative who works for EBMUD who control the flows, it was 3' above overflow stage yesterday and 1.5' today and they expect it to drop below the spillway tomorrow, but thursday another 2 or 3 day storm is expected.

Oroville actually has the destinction, maybe overtaken by SF now, but they were the Welfare hub of northern California 6+ years ago, the last time I visited Buzz and the staff at Huntington's store.

Calfire will be there for water rescues. We can't have them laying around on their union asses during something this big now can we?
Oroville is a welfare Chithole because of a bunch of enviro wackos, shutting down the mills and logging.
The good residents certainly didn't make that decision.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
Reagan was the governor when this dam was finished.


Thanks, Syc,....I'll remember to cast an evil glance at his signed pic on my wall when I walk past this evening,

....azzwhole

GTC


Oroville Dam contract was actually let with the main construction occurring during the reign of the super left wing Democrat, Governor Pat Brown. Although the dam was completed in 1968 while Reagan was governor, he had nothing to do with the construction or contracts.

Calif. is a total cesspool of corrupt officials, top to bottom, and most are Democrats. It was then and is now. Let's not forget that the present governor is Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown, the extreme left wing liberal son of former Gov. Pat Brown. Peas in a pod.

FWIW.

L.W.
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Originally Posted by duck911


Agreed. Wishing a catastrophe on ANY US population is childish, in bad taste, and shows one's true colors. But beyond that, Deerwhacker's comments shows extreme ignorance.

I was born and raised 30 minutes north in Chico, Ca. Let me tell you what's in the path of a potential flood:

- Some of the richest almond and walnut orchards in the country.
- Some of the most prolific rice fields in the country
- Destruction of Feather River corridor, rich in wildlife and diversity
- Damage to many Northern Sacramento Valley communities (many of those, conservative areas)
- Some of the premier waterfowl stopover habitat in the Pacific flyway, and at least a half dozen critical National Wildlife Refuges plus some of the last decent pheasant habitat in the state
- Loss of property and human life

Quite a few classless replies on this post. Some of 24HCF's bottom feeders are in full force tonight...


+1



I agree, it's not the peoples fault, I blame the bloated inefficient government, as usual the people will suffer and they don't deserve it.

Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by dale06
My daughter is evacuating. She just called wanting advice.
I am worried.


Tell her ain't nothing physical worth dying for and get on the road to high ground, stat!


I just got a PM from another "fire" member offering a place for her to stay. Unbelievably nice of him.
She was already on a freeway headed to a friends house that is safe.
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Originally Posted by smarquez
Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
[b][color:#3333FF]Live Coverage[/color][/b] .

Maybe it'll wash a few Million libs out of Sacramento and San Fran to the sea..

Need to study your geography. That area is Californias heartland. The liberals are in San Francisco and Los Angeles and will likely not have any effect.


Geography and political studies for all... No liberals in Sacramento? Seriously?

You got me, count Excremento in as a lberal chit hole. It is a lot different further north and up river.
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
There are a lot of innocents who are going to have their lives turned upside down. I hate that Americans are being put through this.


My retired Platoon Sergeant and dear friend is in the path of this. He suffered a catastrophic car accident that shattered his hip and broke his shoulder and knee cap just before Christmas. He is the toughest 68 year old I know but he is still just hobbling around.

I just got through to him and he is packing up his house and going to Beale AFB until further. I offered to go get him and his wife (and dogs, Moose and Bear) until it's over, but he is too proud to accept help.

The area affected by this does not have any liberals. Only farmers and tweakers. The liberals in the cities sneer at these "country folk" and curse them for living where tax dollars might go to somebody not as "cool" as themselves.

There are a lot of homeless along the Sacramento river that are going to be washed away tonight.
Originally Posted by old_willys
RCBS address sounds like they are right in the middle of this

RCBS
605 Oro Dam Boulevard East
Oroville, CA 95965



2 1/4 miles downstream

[Linked Image]
Well in this case the further it flows the lefter it gets. Truly some non-sense posted here tonight. The good the bad and the ugly.
Update (8:30 p.m. PST): Officials are moving construction equipment into position in preparation for a daring operation to plug the hole in the emergency spillway by using rocks, which are to be dropped from helicopters.

Meanwhile, there are unconfirmed reports of looting in the largely-empty town of Oroville.
If Pelosi, Boxer, the Browns, and Feinstein were all stuffed into the hole, all the people of Cali would be saved from a lot more harm.
It may not help the flooding, but the aftermath will be a LOT better.
Originally Posted by Sycamore
the difference here is the Teton Dam failed from within the actual fill/ There was seepage along one abutment, saturation of the fill, and the ds face of the dam gave way.

Oroville Dam has an auxiliary spillway problem. I have read worst case scenario (which is pretty bad) thirty feet deep breach may form to bedrock. losing 30 feet of water off the top of that reservoir is going to be a lot of water downstream.

Nothing like losing the 700 feet of the main embankment.

Sycamore


The cutting potential of water is amazing...
Originally Posted by szihn
If Pelosi, Boxer, the Browns, and Feinstein were all stuffed into the hole, all the people of Cali would be saved from a lot more harm.
It may not help the flooding, but the aftermath will be a LOT better.
. Best plan yet ...as dense as they are....
roger that.

shear stress from water in an open channel is a function of the depth and the velocity. should be plenty of both. good news is the aux spillway is off to one side, so there is bedrock down only 30 feet.

Sycamore
[quote=MtnBoomer]Update (8:30 p.m. PST): Officials are moving construction equipment into position in preparation for a daring operation to plug the hole in the emergency spillway by using rocks, which are to be dropped from helicopters.

Rocks from a chopper ????? Wtf ...a little math would tell that ain't going to work !!!! Good lord.....
Water flowing at 7 mph has the equivalent force per unit area as air blowing at EF5 tornado wind ....Water moving at 25 mph has the pressure equivalent of wind blowing at 790 mph, faster than the speed of sound....(weather channel)
Originally Posted by atvalaska
[quote=MtnBoomer]Update (8:30 p.m. PST): Officials are moving construction equipment into position in preparation for a daring operation to plug the hole in the emergency spillway by using rocks, which are to be dropped from helicopters.

Rocks from a chopper ????? Wtf ...a little math would tell that ain't going to work !!!! Good lord.....


Maybe they can drop a few loads of those solar reflecting "spheres" to plug the holes.... crazy
Originally Posted by atvalaska
[quote=MtnBoomer]Update (8:30 p.m. PST): Officials are moving construction equipment into position in preparation for a daring operation to plug the hole in the emergency spillway by using rocks, which are to be dropped from helicopters.

Rocks from a chopper ????? Wtf ...a little math would tell that ain't going to work !!!! Good lord.....


When those rocks roll into homes 30 miles downstream there will be repercussions...
Originally Posted by atvalaska
[quote=MtnBoomer]Update (8:30 p.m. PST): Officials are moving construction equipment into position in preparation for a daring operation to plug the hole in the emergency spillway by using rocks, which are to be dropped from helicopters.

Rocks from a chopper ????? Wtf ...a little math would tell that ain't going to work !!!! Good lord.....


Big heavy skycranes are used a lot, in setting Gabien baskets at difficult to access locales.REAL common further south in the mudslide after wildfire belt.

Given the counter rotor resonance they are KNOWN to set up in semi elastic formations below, I'm surprised they're considering their use as an option.

....when all you've got is a hammer,....

GTC

My brother was on a crew that dumped loads of rocks into the cowlitz river during the 07 flood at the bridge to try and save it. These were two rocks per dump truck. They backed up to the rail dumped them and they could hear the rocks rolling down river. They better bring some big rocks.
Originally Posted by GreatWaputi
Originally Posted by atvalaska
[quote=MtnBoomer]Update (8:30 p.m. PST): Officials are moving construction equipment into position in preparation for a daring operation to plug the hole in the emergency spillway by using rocks, which are to be dropped from helicopters.

Rocks from a chopper ????? Wtf ...a little math would tell that ain't going to work !!!! Good lord.....


Maybe they can drop a few loads of those solar reflecting "spheres" to plug the holes.... crazy


New meaning to Clean Energy.
Originally Posted by Sycamore
roger that.

shear stress from water in an open channel is a function of the depth and the velocity. should be plenty of both. good news is the aux spillway is off to one side, so there is bedrock down only 30 feet.

Sycamore


Why do you say "bedrock down 30 feet?"

Undermining of the auxiliary spillway was why they have increased the main spillway flow to over 100,000 CFS attempting to lower water levels below the auxiliary.
Has is washed out yet or is there still hope?


Oroville weather.
Yes Ted, RCBS and Huntington's are just off the freeway, on the road to the dam, at least the way I have gone when Camping/ fishing at Oroville about 20 years ago. When the Huntington's sold to Blount, I believe, they kept the store and sold the manufacturing business.

The way Buzz Huntington told us, Oroville became the welfare city and scum from all over moved there, not that hard working Loggers who lost jobs to "save the owls" caused the scum. I am sure hard working folks moved to cities with work, not became scum.

Yep, plenty of Liberals in Sacramento. And good post on the farmland and waterfowl land that might become underwater for awhile. Our Dairy/ grain/ corn farming relatives have had hay fields under water, dried up for 2 weeks and back to underwater probably for another week, it should recover if not covered in silt. Grapes and tree's that aren't pushed over will also survive, the worst here around Sacramento's 60 mile radius are the tree's that have saturated rootballs and have fallen, and erosion to roads. With road closures around me the diverted traffic is still crossing country roads with 4" or less "creeks" flowing over them, and those roads are suffering the extra loads of trucks and more traffic on the waterlogged roadbase. Lots of potholes are being created, but that isn't fixable or stuff to worry about. I never knew how many big rigs deliver to one of my close big wineries until they were routed by my Dad's house. I spent 4 hours yesterday morning moving water around his house and saw more trucks than I ever imagined driving by his place.

For those who are well-wishers, thanks. California gets hammered here, but we Conservatives have grown thick skin, or we would have moved like some here keep suggesting we should do. I live on land my family has owned since 1903, and my grandkids will live here too if my kid's raise them right. Rant over
Originally Posted by hemiallen
Yes Ted, RCBS and Huntington's are just off the freeway, on the road to the dam, at least the way I have gone when Camping/ fishing at Oroville about 20 years ago. When the Huntington's sold to Blount, I believe, they kept the store and sold the manufacturing business.

The way Buzz Huntington told us, Oroville became the welfare city and scum from all over moved there, not that hard working Loggers who lost jobs to "save the owls" caused the scum. I am sure hard working folks moved to cities with work, not became scum.

Yep, plenty of Liberals in Sacramento. And good post on the farmland and waterfowl land that might become underwater for awhile. Our Dairy/ grain/ corn farming relatives have had hay fields under water, dried up for 2 weeks and back to underwater probably for another week, it should recover if not covered in silt. Grapes and tree's that aren't pushed over will also survive, the worst here around Sacramento's 60 mile radius are the tree's that have saturated rootballs and have fallen, and erosion to roads. With road closures around me the diverted traffic is still crossing country roads with 4" or less "creeks" flowing over them, and those roads are suffering the extra loads of trucks and more traffic on the waterlogged roadbase. Lots of potholes are being created, but that isn't fixable or stuff to worry about. I never knew how many big rigs deliver to one of my close big wineries until they were routed by my Dad's house. I spent 4 hours yesterday morning moving water around his house and saw more trucks than I ever imagined driving by his place.

For those who are well-wishers, thanks. California gets hammered here, but we Conservatives have grown thick skin, or we would have moved like some cowards here keep suggesting we should do. I live on land my family has owned since 1903, and my grandkids will live here too if my kid's raise them right. Rant over


I feel your pain. This chithole is controlled by Portland, Salem, Eugene. Outside of that, there a lot of conservatives.
My daughter and my grandkids (and friends as well) are pretty much at ground zero. They are in the middle of evac.

Looks like all you CA haters might have your wishes partly fulfilled. Hey, with a little luck, we might have a massive earthquake to go along with it, you'd all be thrilled.

GO F UCK YOURSELVES!
Just an aside. Waterfowl can deal with flooding pretty dammed well.
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Just an aside. Waterfowl can deal with flooding pretty dammed well.


I assume you're referring to my post...

Severe flooding can destroy levee's, weirs, and flood control structures that CREATE that habitat.

Since you really don't know what you're talking about........... FOAD.
Originally Posted by Craigster
My daughter and my grandkids (and friends as well) are pretty much at ground zero. They are in the middle of evac.

Looks like all you CA haters might have your wishes partly fulfilled. Hey, with a little luck, we might have a massive earthquake to go along with it, you'd all be thrilled.

GO F UCK YOURSELVES!


PM incoming.
Originally Posted by duck911
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Just an aside. Waterfowl can deal with flooding pretty dammed well.


I assume you're referring to my post...

Severe flooding can destroy levee's, weirs, and flood control structures that CREATE that habitat.

Since you really don't know what you're talking about........... FOAD.


FOAD? Yah, you are a quality individual. There's truly no need to worry about the waterfowl.... They'll be fine.
Oh the walnuts! OMG the walnuts!
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Oh the walnuts! OMG the walnuts!


It's a $1.4 BILLION dollar industry for California and supports tens of thousands of jobs.

You really, truly have no idea what you're talking about and probably should shut up before it becomes clear how ignorant you really are.
The family has 1000 acres of Walnuts outside Yuba city and 1000 acres of rice in live Oak. OMG the walnuts is right. But I'm more concerned about those that live in the path of a flood than our trees at this time. Hope we all survive this event with no loss of life or property.
Just a reply to duckguy. You're all pissy at me because I truly think the waterfowl will be just fine... Seriously. Like the Pacific Flyway is in danger because of a flood? Come on. Seriously?
Originally Posted by Craigster
My daughter and my grandkids (and friends as well) are pretty much at ground zero. They are in the middle of evac.

Looks like all you CA haters might have your wishes partly fulfilled. Hey, with a little luck, we might have a massive earthquake to go along with it, you'd all be thrilled.

GO F UCK YOURSELVES!


Craigster, I hope your family make it out of there safe and sound. My parents have a vacation home in CA 86 miles from Oroville dam...
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Just a reply to duckguy. You're all pissy at me because I truly think the waterfowl will be just fine... Seriously. Like the Pacific Flyway is in danger because of a flood? Come on. Seriously?


Just a reply to Mtnoomer. I kinda thought you were a worthless POS f uck wad. Now I know you are.
You guy's will biotch over the silliest stuff....

Nobody in particular, just funny how the importance of folk's being evacuated turns into a " I know more than you do", LOFL

And I do think the tree's will survive just like most of my Grape farmers and small walnut farms around me, the tree's are dormant, if the soil is still there and the tree's are not pushed over by swift waterflow, mother nature will prosper this spring. I was surprised 2 weeks ago when the one hay field's water receded, the crop was still there, a little yellow in a few spots, but still 8-12" tall.It is again under water.

Originally Posted by Craigster
My daughter and my grandkids (and friends as well) are pretty much at ground zero. They are in the middle of evac.

Looks like all you CA haters might have your wishes partly fulfilled. Hey, with a little luck, we might have a massive earthquake to go along with it, you'd all be thrilled.

GO F UCK YOURSELVES!


Craigster,

Many folks here don't realize what they associate with "California" predominately lies South of the Golden Gate and west of the Sierra Nevada's.

The rest of California is filled with many great people who produce many of the products we enjoy.

Good luck to your family. I hope they make it to high ground soon.
Originally Posted by Craigster
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Just a reply to duckguy. You're all pissy at me because I truly think the waterfowl will be just fine... Seriously. Like the Pacific Flyway is in danger because of a flood? Come on. Seriously?


Just a reply to Mtnoomer. I kinda thought you were a worthless POS f uck wad. Now I know you are.


Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Just an aside. Waterfowl can deal with flooding pretty dammed well.


I agree this was outrageous of me to say?????????????????
I'd rather be concerned with my sis down stream then the fucqking ducks. LOL
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Originally Posted by Craigster
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Just a reply to duckguy. You're all pissy at me because I truly think the waterfowl will be just fine... Seriously. Like the Pacific Flyway is in danger because of a flood? Come on. Seriously?


Just a reply to Mtnoomer. I kinda thought you were a worthless POS f uck wad. Now I know you are.


Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Just an aside. Waterfowl can deal with flooding pretty dammed well.


I agree this was outrageous of me to say?????????????????


Not outrageous at all. But it doesn't change the fact that you're a worthless POS f uck wad.
Originally Posted by Craigster
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Originally Posted by Craigster
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Just a reply to duckguy. You're all pissy at me because I truly think the waterfowl will be just fine... Seriously. Like the Pacific Flyway is in danger because of a flood? Come on. Seriously?


Just a reply to Mtnoomer. I kinda thought you were a worthless POS f uck wad. Now I know you are.


Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Just an aside. Waterfowl can deal with flooding pretty dammed well.


I agree this was outrageous of me to say?????????????????


Not outrageous at all. But it doesn't change the fact that you're a worthless POS f uck wad.


Ok then... I'm just not seeing it. Might be that your ill mood could be better directed toward those that were wishing ill upon ya'll... As I didn't. Just pointing out the FACT that the waterfowl will be fine...
The walnut comment was a jab though..
Any updates?
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Any updates?



Update (8:36 p.m. PST): The Butte County Sheriff announces that county jails are being evacuated to other prison facilities; shelters are being opened for displaced residents; and Butte College facilities and buses will be shut down on Monday. A statement on Facebook indicates the situation at the dam is precarious: “The next several hours will be crucial in determining whether the concrete structure at the head of the auxiliary spillway remains intact and prevents larger, uncontrolled flows.”

Update (8:48 PST): Mark Finan of local NBC affiliate KCRA reports that the level of the lake has dropped to near 100% capacity — just over 901 feet above sea level — such that flow has effectively ended over the emergency spillway.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by Craigster
My daughter and my grandkids (and friends as well) are pretty much at ground zero. They are in the middle of evac.

Looks like all you CA haters might have your wishes partly fulfilled. Hey, with a little luck, we might have a massive earthquake to go along with it, you'd all be thrilled.

GO F UCK YOURSELVES!


Craigster,

Many folks here don't realize what they associate with "California" predominately lies South of the Golden Gate and west of the Sierra Nevada's.

The rest of California is filled with many great people who produce many of the products we enjoy.

Good luck to your family. I hope they make it to high ground soon.


Thank you for your kind thoughts.
Yep, I just read that too. Seems like the water has stopped running over the spillway for now.

That's good.
Prayers lifted for our friends in California.

G
lot of water
[Linked Image][Linked Image][Linked Image]
Unfortunately, to paraphrase Johnny Cash, "Looks like y'all are gonna be blessed with a little more rain"

How High's the Water, Momma?"
Are the adrenaline junkies riding kayaks and boogie-boards down the spillway yet?
Even if the situation remains stable for the next day or two, rain, and lots of it, is predicted to arrive again late Wednesday and continue for several days.

This very dangerous situation could continue to play out for a couple of weeks.

There are now over 100,000 people evacuating, as of 11:00 pm.

There is a hole in the emergency spillway that they are trying to fill with rocks, and bags of rocks, dropped from helicopters. The hole is slowly growing and eroding. If that portion of the emergency spillway gives way, it is expected to lose the 30' of dirt down to bedrock. The presumption is that the bedrock would hold. In that case a 30' wall of water would be released. If the bedrock at the 30' level doesn't hold, then all bets are off.

The Sheriff is reporting that the rumors of looting in Oroville are false, and were started when an individual was caught breaking into a business, that was not related to the evacuations. That was an isolated incident like what happens any day.

I dropped in at Huntingtons on Oro Dam Blvd a few days ago on my way to the Campfire get-together in Tonto Basin, Arizona. Little did I know that those folks would so soon be in peril. My hopes and prayers go out to all those affected by this dangerous situation.
The news is currently reporting that the water is no longer running over the top of the emergency spillway, but is still leaking through the hole that is lower down in that area.

They are letting water out of the main spillway at the maximum rate they can, which is currently letting water out of the lake faster than it is inflowing into the lake.

Whether they can keep up this higher outflow may depend on the continuing damage and erosion that is occurring on the main spillway. They are in a race with time to lower the water level before the next storms arrive on late Wednesday. The spokesman says the ideal target would be to get the level down 50' from the top. This will be an ongoing story.
Sounds like a really shiddy situation with the main spillway and the emergency spillway both compromised.

I guess using the damaged main spillway is the best option for now.
"They" say that as of now, the main dam itself is not compromised. However, if the main spillway area becomes too eroded, then, theoretically the main dam might become compromised.

If they have to reduce the output to prevent compromising the main dam while new storms add more input, the emergency spillway will be overflowing again.

The max outflow that is occurring now is already flooding some low areas and putting a lot of stress on many levees. If levees start giving away much property damage will occur even if the dam and the spillways remain secure.

Half of the purpose of a dam is to provide flood control. The minute a dam reaches full capacity, there is no more control.

The news just reported that many of the roads in Butte County are very jammed with vehicles trying to evacuate. It is also a good bet that there are lines at the gas stations as people who constantly run around with their tanks near empty learn a good life lesson.
Trump should use this as a sledgehammer to set the stage for his infrastructure spending plan.
Better get the hell out
Prayers lifted for the safe evacuation of all of the families affected. Prayers lifted for all of the emergency responders who are involved.

Time to fix the problem at hand. There will be plenty of time for blame game after the fact...
Originally Posted by bigwhoop
Shows once again just how ill-prepared the government is to engineer and maintain something as basic as a dam.
When it breaches and causes loss of life and property I'm sure "climate change" will be at the heart of the cause.
Never mind democrats in charge of the State most likely didn't maintain its structural integrity.
Good luck to 'em.



All that tax revenue and this is the best the idiots could do
Originally Posted by Oldelkhunter
Originally Posted by bigwhoop
Shows once again just how ill-prepared the government is to engineer and maintain something as basic as a dam.
When it breaches and causes loss of life and property I'm sure "climate change" will be at the heart of the cause.
Never mind democrats in charge of the State most likely didn't maintain its structural integrity.
Good luck to 'em.



All that tax revenue and this is the best the idiots could do


They seem to have spent a good amount on floating plastic balls. Different reservoir.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/los-angeles-reservoir-covered-96-million-shade-balls/story?id=33038319
Originally Posted by Orion2000
Prayers lifted for the safe evacuation of all of the families affected. Prayers lifted for all of the emergency responders who are involved.

Time to fix the problem at hand. There will be plenty of time for blame game after the fact...

Indeed.
Gotta love how the liberal puke news and weather people make everything "the worst it's ever been" now from snow to ice to heat always predict stupidity!! Supposed to be the worst ice storm here ever didn't even rain!! just a bunch of fear mongering idiots!!!!!!!!
How long after this breaks, does the left wait to blame Trump?
Originally Posted by GreatWaputi
I'm no fan of California, but I also hate to see people's lives ruined or lost at the expense of the idiots in charge. Kind of like the fugged up state where I live. I'll keep my fingers crossed for a good outcome.



Yeah, what he said. I have in-laws in southern CA, good people, but basically clueless about everything. Not liberal, just friggin' clueless.

They would not be effected by this, but I'd hate for anyone to get flooded out. Seen a lot of that during the '93 floods along the Missouri/Mississippi river drainage. I saw dead deer carcasses 30 feet up in the forks of tree limbs. Not a good thing for anyone, ever.
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
[Linked Image]


A guy could get a lot of ducks in that hole.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
How long after this breaks, does the left wait to blame Trump?


Read back a ways,....this is all Ronald Reagan's "Fault".
....at least according to one well known lib here.

GTC
Originally Posted by tzone
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
[Linked Image]


A guy could get a lot of ducks in that hole.


Given the absolutely SUPERB levels of material strengths and properties of materials available during construction, THAT is one PISS POOR piece of work there, my friend.
The SOB did not "fail from lack of infrastructure maintenance" as proposed by one little cheap shot sniper hiding in the weeds. Well engineered and executed structural concrete's supposed to get STRONGER for it's first century,....and epoxy coated, high tensile re-bar was an accomplished FACT of that day.

That structure was a POS the day they cut the ribbon and headed back for the whorehouse.

GTC
There is at least one idiot already calling for Trumps impeachment on Youtube! LMAO.
I haven't read the whole thread, but when it's man against nature, nature will always win, in the long run.

As anyone from Louisiana knows, water is one the most destructive forces in nature. As long as you can keep the flow rate down, it's just nasty. When the flow rate goes up, it get destructive, very fast. With the amount of flow they had, its a wonder it didn't do more damage.


Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by tzone
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
[Linked Image]


A guy could get a lot of ducks in that hole.


Given the absolutely SUPERB levels of material strengths and properties of materials available during construction, THAT is one PISS POOR piece of work there, my friend.
The SOB did not "fail from lack of infrastructure maintenance" as proposed by one little cheap shot sniper hiding in the weeds. Well engineered and executed structural concrete's supposed to get STRONGER for it's first century,....and epoxy coated, high tensile re-bar was an accomplished FACT of that day.

That structure was a POS the day they cut the ribbon and headed back for the whorehouse.

GTC


I don't see ANY rebar. Am I missing it or is it not there?

I work in this industry daily. There are a lot of things wrong with this picture.
Originally Posted by Oldman03
I haven't read the whole thread, but when it's man against nature, nature will always win, in the long run.

As anyone from Louisiana knows, water is one the most destructive forces in nature. As long as you can keep the flow rate down, it's just nasty. When the flow rate goes up, it get destructive, very fast. With the amount of flow they had, its a wonder it didn't do more damage.




Given the extraordinary volumes expected, what's the current perspective on the Mississippi's readiness to handle the Spring Thaw ?
Quote

I don't see ANY rebar. Am I missing it or is it not there?

I work in this industry daily. There are a lot of things wrong with this picture.


It would be GREAT to see some actual close ups, wouldn't it ?

No remains of normal grouted in "bolts" angled down into bedrock, either.

GTC
This morning the number of evacuees has been raised to 188,000.

The water level in the lake was lowered a bit over a foot overnight.

The bad news is that the Weather Service prediction for the Feather River watershed that runs into the lake is for as much as a foot of rain over the next ten days. They probably can't let water out fast enough to keep it from overflowing again in the coming two weeks.

The helicopters are flying now, dropping bags of rocks to try to strengthen the weak area around the emergency spillway.

They just announced that a train south of Roseville derailed due to water over the tracks. Many trains are now being rerouted out of the area that is or may be affected by this Oroville Dam situation.
Originally Posted by tzone
I don't see ANY rebar. Am I missing it or is it not there?

I work in this industry daily. There are a lot of things wrong with this picture.


Same "California Engineering" that gave us parking lots that are conjoined, but you can't drive from one to the other without getting back on the crowded public roads and sitting through red lights... whistle
Actually, this is a clusterfugg caused by man...the main spillway has been damaged for a while and DWR people were well aware of it....there was never any danger of the dam nor the main spillway failing....BUT the high flows into the lake AND the damage to the lower section of the main spillway, gave them an opportunity and EXCUSE to TEST the auxiliary (EMERGENCY) spillway...
I'm sure a hummingbird egg leftover from last year caused the maintenance to be postponed...
I doubt that "they" deliberately created an emergency to test the emergency spillway.

I never thought to test-fire the ejection seat in my A-4 to see if it would work if I needed it to.

People who run dams love being in control. To ensure their careers they tend to be too conservative. We have always complained that the people running Shasta Dam never want the lake within 30 feet of the top, in case big, late Spring rain totals occur. They almost never happen, then we wind up looking at a big dirt ring around the lake all summer, and their isn't enough cool water for the salmon in the river downstream during the later part of the summer.

People who love being in control don't want to lose control, which is what happens when dams overflow.
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Actually, this is a clusterfugg caused by man...the main spillway has been damaged for a while and DWR people were well aware of it....there was never any danger of the dam nor the main spillway failing....BUT the high flows into the lake AND the damage to the lower section of the main spillway, gave them an opportunity and EXCUSE to TEST the auxiliary (EMERGENCY) spillway...


I saw the damaged spillway on TV. Given its location (close to the dam itself), the depth of the hole and, the velocity of the water, I think the dam could possibly collapse due to scowering of the rest of the spillway up to the dam supports. I do think the evacuation is a prudent move, give the catastrophe that will result if it collapses.
Some pics. To show scale or whatever.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
I'm sure a hummingbird egg leftover from last year caused the maintenance to be postponed...


[Linked Image]

Ah, so this picture makes more sense to me. The main spillway had damage. The emergency spillway then cut into the main spillway exacerbating the damage.

That's bad...really bad.

[Linked Image]

The California Department of Water Resources stopped the spillway flow on Thursday morning to allow engineers to evaluate the integrity of the structure after water had been released at 20,000 cubic feet per second through the night. (Courtesy of the California Department of Water Resources).

Originally Posted by rnovi
Ah, so this picture makes more sense to me. The main spillway had damage. The emergency spillway then cut into the main spillway exacerbating the damage.

That's bad...really bad.

[Linked Image]

The California Department of Water Resources stopped the spillway flow on Thursday morning to allow engineers to evaluate the integrity of the structure after water had been released at 20,000 cubic feet per second through the night. (Courtesy of the California Department of Water Resources).

Bad indeed.. Yikes..


Only thing I ever saw close to that was back in the '70s when a town south of me got 7" of rain in about an hour.. A 2 block section of an entire STREET (sidewalk-to-sidewalk and 20+ feet deep) washed into the Mississippi..

It was incredible - but nothing like the size of the damage above.. Those residents beneath are lucky that thing didn't fail.. eek
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by djs
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Actually, this is a clusterfugg caused by man...the main spillway has been damaged for a while and DWR people were well aware of it....there was never any danger of the dam nor the main spillway failing....BUT the high flows into the lake AND the damage to the lower section of the main spillway, gave them an opportunity and EXCUSE to TEST the auxiliary (EMERGENCY) spillway...


I saw the damaged spillway on TV. Given its location (close to the dam itself), the depth of the hole and, the velocity of the water, I think the dam could possibly collapse due to scowering of the rest of the spillway up to the dam supports. I do think the evacuation is a prudent move, give the catastrophe that will result if it collapses.


Can't happen....it rests on bedrock. and the damaged part of the spillway is a LONG ways away from not only the Dam, but the spillway gates themselves.
That pic is of another damned dam. LOL Dammm that's a hole!

THANKS RNOVI sorry for the dumphucqktitudeness. MB

Originally Posted by rnovi
Ah, so this picture makes more sense to me. The main spillway had damage. The emergency spillway then cut into the main spillway exacerbating the damage.

That's bad...really bad.

[Linked Image]

The California Department of Water Resources stopped the spillway flow on Thursday morning to allow engineers to evaluate the integrity of the structure after water had been released at 20,000 cubic feet per second through the night. (Courtesy of the California Department of Water Resources).

MB,.....THANKS for putting up all the good diagrams and photos !

GTC
Originally Posted by rnovi
Ah, so this picture makes more sense to me. The main spillway had damage. The emergency spillway then cut into the main spillway exacerbating the damage.

That's bad...really bad.

[Linked Image]

The California Department of Water Resources stopped the spillway flow on Thursday morning to allow engineers to evaluate the integrity of the structure after water had been released at 20,000 cubic feet per second through the night. (Courtesy of the California Department of Water Resources).



No, the emergency spillway is routed through a ravine quite a ways away from the main spillway...
Quote
Can't happen....it rests on bedrock. and the damaged part of the spillway is a LONG ways away from not only the Dam, but the spillway gates themselves.


If the quality of the "grout curtain" along said bedrock is anywhere's near as poor as the concrete work on that spillway, your faith in the integrity of the whole show may be a wee bit misplaced.

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by Oldman03
I haven't read the whole thread, but when it's man against nature, nature will always win, in the long run.

As anyone from Louisiana knows, water is one the most destructive forces in nature. As long as you can keep the flow rate down, it's just nasty. When the flow rate goes up, it get destructive, very fast. With the amount of flow they had, its a wonder it didn't do more damage.




Given the extraordinary volumes expected, what's the current perspective on the Mississippi's readiness to handle the Spring Thaw ?


It's anyone guess. First they will open the gates at Simsport and let more water down the Atchafalaya.

Then the Bonnet Carrie Spillway will be opened. This is above NO, on the river and lets fresh water into Lake Pontchatrain. Oyster fishermen hate this. Keeps NO from flooding, unless it gets really bad.

Last, if needed, they will open the gates at Morganza and flood the Atchafalaya Basin. This has only happened 2 times.

After these 3 things, you are 'out of luck'. One of these days, those things will not be enough and when it happens, 1/4 of La. will flood. It happened in '27, before the present levee system was finished. My Granddad told me about it.



Wonder why dumbF%^k jim cantori from the weather channel isn't standing in the center of it yelling and flailing his arms, in horrible danger of his life too tell people!!! fugging shaved head P O S
Hopin things work out ok for folks in that area

Ma nature, like most women doesn't always respond well to being manipulated

Good luck, maybe with a bit of that they can get some repairs made
The dam isn't leaking...it isn't that I have "faith in the integrity of the whole show", because this pic shows they were well aware of the damage a LONG time ago...the thing is, this was caused by the operators of the dam...they never needed to slow the releases from the main spillway...they chose instead to let the lake rise to the EMERGENCY spillway and it probably over stressed its design capabilities....notice how quickly they've lowered the level???

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
MB,.....THANKS for putting up all the good diagrams and photos !

GTC


You're welcome. Have not found any info on the work that was reported being done last night, dropping stones from the air. Hopefully they kept it carbon neutral. smile
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
That pic is of another damned dam. LOL

Originally Posted by rnovi
Ah, so this picture makes more sense to me. The main spillway had damage. The emergency spillway then cut into the main spillway exacerbating the damage.

That's bad...really bad.

[Linked Image]

The California Department of Water Resources stopped the spillway flow on Thursday morning to allow engineers to evaluate the integrity of the structure after water had been released at 20,000 cubic feet per second through the night. (Courtesy of the California Department of Water Resources).



Actually, that's the current damage to the Oroville Spillway.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/12/us/california-oroville-dam-failure/index.html

Scroll down about halfway on the Cartoon News Network...it shows the comparison pix.

Holey hell dammm Sorry man! Chit - that looks badder!

Originally Posted by rnovi
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
That pic is of another damned dam. LOL

Originally Posted by rnovi
Ah, so this picture makes more sense to me. The main spillway had damage. The emergency spillway then cut into the main spillway exacerbating the damage.

That's bad...really bad.

[Linked Image]

The California Department of Water Resources stopped the spillway flow on Thursday morning to allow engineers to evaluate the integrity of the structure after water had been released at 20,000 cubic feet per second through the night. (Courtesy of the California Department of Water Resources).



Actually, that's the current damage to the Oroville Spillway.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/12/us/california-oroville-dam-failure/index.html

Scroll down about halfway on the Cartoon News Network...it shows the comparison pix.

Originally Posted by bigwhoop
They better get Peelosi, Maxine Waters and Feinstein out there to start filling sandbags.
They better fill the sandbags with them. It would be so fitting and the only thing they are good for.
Originally Posted by djs


I think the dam could possibly collapse due to scowering of the rest of the spillway up to the dam supports.



There should be no SCOWS anywhere near either spillway.

[Linked Image]

That was some major h20 overflowing this past night or 2. How can the entire underside not be compromised now?? I'm surprised the whole slab didn't go.

Bet they have to darn near rebuild the whole thing.

No doubt it will be blamed on Trump!!

Godspeed recovery to those effected.
Originally Posted by RickyD
Originally Posted by bigwhoop
They better get Peelosi, Maxine Waters and Feinstein out there to start filling sandbags.
They better fill the sandbags with them. It would be so fitting and the only thing they are good for.


I thought CA was a very "environmentally conscious" state? There is probably an agency that would have a problem with folks throwing chit like that in the water.....
Quote
The dam isn't leaking...it isn't that I have "faith in the integrity of the whole show", because this pic shows they were well aware of the damage a LONG time ago...the thing is, this was caused by the operators of the dam...they never needed to slow the releases from the main spillway...they chose instead to let the lake rise to the EMERGENCY spillway and it probably over stressed its design capabilities....notice how quickly they've lowered the level???


I think you're really confused about what's actually going on, mate.

GTC
...not sayin I ain't, either.

GTC
Prayers sent for those living in the vicinity.

Looks like much will have to be done to restore the dam, whether it was long overdue or not.
The money that was earmarked for dam maintenance is instead being spent to hire Eric Holder to combat President Trump's new policies to safeguard our nation.
Sure left a clean hole.Never seen concrete demo that clean.Where is the gnarly rebar with concrete chunks.
Right click, View image.

[Linked Image]
Close up you can see where the rebar was pulled right out of the concrete.Damn.
Fill it with epoxy. grin
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
The dam isn't leaking...it isn't that I have "faith in the integrity of the whole show", because this pic shows they were well aware of the damage a LONG time ago...the thing is, this was caused by the operators of the dam...they never needed to slow the releases from the main spillway...they chose instead to let the lake rise to the EMERGENCY spillway and it probably over stressed its design capabilities....notice how quickly they've lowered the level???

[Linked Image]


MM, I believe you are mistaken... Read this!

The initial damage to the spillway occurred Tuesday, about 3,000 feet downstream from where water enters from the lake. The water flowing out of the hole quickly turned brown with mud as it consumed trees and soil before rejoining the main channel below in a massive confluence wave that sent up clouds of mist in the tree-lined canyon.

The lake was rising at a half-foot per hour Thursday as the inflow peaked at 121,000 cubic feet per second, officials said at a news conference about a mile from the spillway. They were releasing water at about 40,000 cubic feet per second.

That’s not enough to keep the lake from continuing to rise, officials said, but is expected to keep them from having to use a nearby emergency spillway that has never been used since the dam was dedicated in 1968.


http://www.cbsnews.com/news/oroville-dam-emergency-spillway-california-runoff/

Well, they were wrong and had to use the emergency spillway. Now the emergency spillway has failed and they are forced to close it to prevent possible flooding. That is why the evacuation is in order.

They have decided to open the main spillway and let the damage there continue. But opening the main spillway has lowered the water level and saved the emergency dam/spillway, for now.

At least that is my understanding.
Most of those pictures of damage are from Friday or Saturday when they closed the main spillway, as was already posted in this thread yesterday. The main spillway was never the issue. The erosion of the emergency spillway is the issue. That's not what's in those pictures. You can bet the main spillway is far more damaged now than what those pictures show.
Originally Posted by JCMCUBIC
Originally Posted by RickyD
Originally Posted by bigwhoop
They better get Peelosi, Maxine Waters and Feinstein out there to start filling sandbags.
They better fill the sandbags with them. It would be so fitting and the only thing they are good for.


I thought CA was a very "environmentally conscious" state? There is probably an agency that would have a problem with folks throwing chit like that in the water.....
Not to worry. They are entirely composed of rank and stale hot air and nothing as valuable as chit which can grow tomatoes.
Main spillway. Couple of days ago v. today.

[Linked Image]
Min spillway erosion.

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Steve
Main spillway. Couple of days ago v. today.

[Linked Image]


Yeah. As bad as that looks that's not even the worst problem. The hole they are worried about is on the emergency spillway.

This video shows some of the damage at the emergency spillway:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/helicopters-to-drop-in-boulders-to-try-and-stabilize-orville-dam%e2%80%99s-emergency-spillway/vi-AAmTC8U
Originally Posted by Steve
Main spillway. Couple of days ago v. today.

[Linked Image]


It's abundantly clear that the failure began at a seam in the concrete, where I would bet anything that the seal had been lost and water intrusion has been allowing the rebar to rust.

Years ago, I was involved in a whistleblower event regarding a bridge that was on the verge of collapsing. My voiced concern was blown off by the controlling authority initially, with explanation that fractures in concrete were not a problem unless rebar was rusting - and rusting rebar would have to be evidenced by rust stains streaking the concrete. My follow-up photos showing the rust streaks, along with threat to go public when the bridge fails, drew immediate and dramatic positive response.

Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner


[Linked Image]



I'd bet that the photo posted above from 2013 shows when crews were out there looking at rust stains. Makes me wonder what else might not have been reported or dealt with.
Originally Posted by Steve
Min spillway erosion.

[Linked Image]


That's bunch of angry water!!! And more rains OTW. Ominous!!!
A guy might tinpan at the bottom of that and do some good. Might have turned up a few new nuggets.
Originally Posted by FreeMe

[Linked Image]


I'd bet that the photo posted above from 2013 shows when crews were out there looking at rust stains. Makes me wonder what else might not have been reported or dealt with.


Just speaking out my ass, but I'd bet someone in charge thought, "Big deal, we're in a permanent drought now and we'll never use that spillway again".
Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
A guy might tinpan at the bottom of that and do some good. Might have turned up a few new nuggets.


I thought of that, the first I heard of this.

Back in, I think it was '86, there was a flash flood event on the Feather River above Oroville. It washed out roads and stretches of railroad track, and even topped over some of the smaller dams upstream of Oroville lake. That spurred a gold rush that lasted at least a couple years there, IIRC. I don't know if any placer miners struck it rich, but judging from all the new equipment I saw in use, the prospecting equipment makers and sellers must have enjoyed a bonus.
Originally Posted by Steve

Just speaking out my ass, but I'd bet someone in charge thought, "Big deal, we're in a permanent drought now and we'll never use that spillway again".


Probably right - especially if you add "...in my career, if not my lifetime".
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steve
Main spillway. Couple of days ago v. today.

[Linked Image]


It's abundantly clear that the failure began at a seam in the concrete, where I would bet anything that the seal had been lost and water intrusion has been allowing the rebar to rust.

Years ago, I was involved in a whistleblower event regarding a bridge that was on the verge of collapsing. My voiced concern was blown off by the controlling authority initially, with explanation that fractures in concrete were not a problem unless rebar was rusting - and rusting rebar would have to be evidenced by rust stains streaking the concrete. My follow-up photos showing the rust streaks, along with threat to go public when the bridge fails, drew immediate and dramatic positive response.

Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner


[Linked Image]



I'd bet that the photo posted above from 2013 shows when crews were out there looking at rust stains. Makes me wonder what else might not have been reported or dealt with.


Looks like it may have failed from undermining. Percolation from the earthen dam created voids under the slabs.
Originally Posted by Steve
Main spillway. Couple of days ago v. today.

[Linked Image]


That's not from today. The main spillway hasn't stopped flowing since Friday.
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
[quote=rnovi]Ah, so this picture makes more sense to me. The main spillway had damage. The emergency spillway then cut into the main spillway exacerbating the damage.

That's bad...really bad.

[Linked Image]

The California Department of Water Resources stopped the spillway flow on Thursday morning to allow engineers to evaluate the integrity of the structure after water had been released at 20,000 cubic feet per second through the night. (Courtesy of the California Department

No, the emergency spillway is routed through a ravine quite a ways away from the main spillway...


It cut a path back to the main spillway.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
A guy might tinpan at the bottom of that and do some good. Might have turned up a few new nuggets.


I thought of that, the first I heard of this.

Back in, I think it was '86, there was a flash flood event on the Feather River above Oroville. It washed out roads and stretches of railroad track, and even topped over some of the smaller dams upstream of Oroville lake. That spurred a gold rush that lasted at least a couple years there, IIRC. I don't know if any placer miners struck it rich, but judging from all the new equipment I saw in use, the prospecting equipment makers and sellers must have enjoyed a bonus.


1986 Yuba river Levee "broke" in Linda Ca. Some believe it was blown on purpose to save Yuba City.
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/02/...officials-ignored-warnings-12-years-ago/
These arseholes really dropped the ball with the release of information. Water started flowing over the emergency spillway at approximately 8am saturday morning. Local news agencies and "officials" covered the first hour of it then looped the same morning video of it all Saturday and into Sunday. You had to rely on people live stream from the damn to get an idea of what was really going on. You would think that if there was even a slight possibility of the emergency spillway being used(which the officials decided Thursday and Friday wasn't going to happen) for the first time EVER that they would have started to get the word out to start moving away. Instead they start running around with their f ucking heads cut off shouting it's going to fail in an hour, get out of town! Talk about a Cluster f U.K. To the umptenth degree. Heads need to roll. Piss poor management. Piss poor delivery of news. A lot of people got lucky last night.
Originally Posted by PrimeBeef

Looks like it may have failed from undermining. Percolation from the earthen dam created voids under the slabs.


I think you underestimate the power of moving water. I think that a lot of other people who are responsible do too.


The opening kick-off of the blame game. I knew it wouldn't take long.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
A guy might tinpan at the bottom of that and do some good. Might have turned up a few new nuggets.


I thought of that, the first I heard of this.

Back in, I think it was '86, there was a flash flood event on the Feather River above Oroville. It washed out roads and stretches of railroad track, and even topped over some of the smaller dams upstream of Oroville lake. That spurred a gold rush that lasted at least a couple years there, IIRC. I don't know if any placer miners struck it rich, but judging from all the new equipment I saw in use, the prospecting equipment makers and sellers must have enjoyed a bonus.


Corrugated metal culverts are the places to look
Originally Posted by fester
These arseholes really dropped the ball with the release of information. Water started flowing over the emergency spillway at approximately 8am saturday morning. Local news agencies and "officials" covered the first hour of it then looped the same morning video of it all Saturday and into Sunday. You had to rely on people live stream from the damn to get an idea of what was really going on. You would think that if there was even a slight possibility of the emergency spillway being used(which the officials decided Thursday and Friday wasn't going to happen) for the first time EVER that they would have started to get the word out to start moving away. Instead they start running around with their f ucking heads cut off shouting it's going to fail in an hour, get out of town! Talk about a Cluster f U.K. To the umptenth degree. Heads need to roll. Piss poor management. Piss poor delivery of news. A lot of people got lucky last night.


About 120,000 from what I read. Something like 60k made it out. Could be wrong.

Either way God Bless and save them all!!
http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/13/us/california-oroville-dam-spillway-failure/
Good shots and info.



As an aside, since that worked so well last night. laugh

Here's how Butte County CA voted 2016.



PRESIDENT/VICE PRESIDENT
Total
Number of Precincts 141
Precincts Reporting 141 100.0 %
Vote For 1
Times Counted 98879/129286 76.5 %
Total Votes 97002
Times Blank Voted 1727
Times Over Voted 150
Number Of Under Votes 0
TRUMP/PENCE 45144 46.54%
CLINTON/KAINE 41567 42.85%
JOHNSON/WELD 4625 4.77%
STEIN/BARAKA 2594 2.67%
LA RIVA/BANKS 501 0.52%
Write-in Votes 2571 2.65%

Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
A guy might tinpan at the bottom of that and do some good. Might have turned up a few new nuggets.


I thought of that, the first I heard of this.

Back in, I think it was '86, there was a flash flood event on the Feather River above Oroville. It washed out roads and stretches of railroad track, and even topped over some of the smaller dams upstream of Oroville lake. That spurred a gold rush that lasted at least a couple years there, IIRC. I don't know if any placer miners struck it rich, but judging from all the new equipment I saw in use, the prospecting equipment makers and sellers must have enjoyed a bonus.

*Most* merchants have made more money than *most* miners.
Originally Posted by byc
Originally Posted by fester
These arseholes really dropped the ball with the release of information. Water started flowing over the emergency spillway at approximately 8am saturday morning. Local news agencies and "officials" covered the first hour of it then looped the same morning video of it all Saturday and into Sunday. You had to rely on people live stream from the damn to get an idea of what was really going on. You would think that if there was even a slight possibility of the emergency spillway being used(which the officials decided Thursday and Friday wasn't going to happen) for the first time EVER that they would have started to get the word out to start moving away. Instead they start running around with their f ucking heads cut off shouting it's going to fail in an hour, get out of town! Talk about a Cluster f U.K. To the umptenth degree. Heads need to roll. Piss poor management. Piss poor delivery of news. A lot of people got lucky last night.


About 120,000 from what I read. Something like 60k made it out. Could be wrong.

Either way God Bless and save them all!!


Safe for now, I heard there was more rain headed that way.

God help them.
I hope everyone is getting out of the way, knowing people, some wont.
Originally Posted by PrimeBeef
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steve
Main spillway. Couple of days ago v. today.

[Linked Image]


It's abundantly clear that the failure began at a seam in the concrete, where I would bet anything that the seal had been lost and water intrusion has been allowing the rebar to rust.

Years ago, I was involved in a whistleblower event regarding a bridge that was on the verge of collapsing. My voiced concern was blown off by the controlling authority initially, with explanation that fractures in concrete were not a problem unless rebar was rusting - and rusting rebar would have to be evidenced by rust stains streaking the concrete. My follow-up photos showing the rust streaks, along with threat to go public when the bridge fails, drew immediate and dramatic positive response.

Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner


[Linked Image]



I'd bet that the photo posted above from 2013 shows when crews were out there looking at rust stains. Makes me wonder what else might not have been reported or dealt with.


Looks like it may have failed from undermining. Percolation from the earthen dam created voids under the slabs.


Did you see the some of the faulting lines in the over thrust in the formation immediately below that hole ?
Percolation dittos, with a probable grout curtain problem contiguous.

GTC
So, is it going to fail right now?
Or is the danger over until more storms?
Ho Li Phuoc, what a mess!

Somebody sure 'nuff screwed up while traveling down the design/construction/maintenance highway.

For what it might be worth to curious minds:

100,000 cfs = ~750,000 gallons/second
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by PrimeBeef

Looks like it may have failed from undermining. Percolation from the earthen dam created voids under the slabs.


I think you underestimate the power of moving water. I think that a lot of other people who are responsible do too.

This is the principal behind "Digger Dams", which I will be using on my hunting property hopefully this spring. Cut and leveled tree trunks, set into the slope, cause the cascading water to dig out the downhill side. This creates ponds. I hope to have 4 or 5 in series in the same gulley. This will privide standing water for game, where there is now only watershed.
Originally Posted by kellory
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by PrimeBeef

Looks like it may have failed from undermining. Percolation from the earthen dam created voids under the slabs.


I think you underestimate the power of moving water. I think that a lot of other people who are responsible do too.

This is the principal behind "Digger Dams", which I will be using on my hunting property hopefully this spring. Cut and leveled tree trunks, set into the slope, cause the cascading water to dig out the downhill side. This creates ponds. I hope to have 4 or 5 in series in the same gulley. This will privide standing water for game, where there is now only watershed.


Yes, that is probably what made the big hole. But my point was more about how that hole didn't need to be there for hydraulic forces to rip away the concrete skirt once the rebar had failed.
I've yet to SEE any rebar, myself.

You ?

GTC
Looks like plain concrete slope paving. Probably has wire mesh...
Done quite a few channel linings that way.
In fairness, once subgrade was lost, not much would stay. Probably not normally reinforced concrete. It looks to be a fairly thin section, probably, from appearances, around 8"
Couldn't find it in English.
Oroville Faux spillway. Must have been done by liberals. Just a feel good spillway. NO real substance.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
I've yet to SEE any rebar, myself.

You ?

GTC


It's there. You have to remeber the pics you see are from a helicopter. Find some pics with the workers inside of the wash out in the spillway and maybe you will understand the size of the hole and why you don't see rebar.
Originally Posted by mcmurphrjk
In fairness, once subgrade was lost, not much would stay. Probably not normally reinforced concrete. It looks to be a fairly thin section, probably, from appearances, around 8"


Your a f u kin idiot. 8" you say?? Lmao.
Originally Posted by WildWest
Oroville Faux spillway. Must have been done by liberals. Just a feel good spillway. NO real substance.


Hilarious, with no real substance.
Well ! fester you seem to know? What are the spec's on the spillway?
Originally Posted by fester
[quote=mcmurphrjk]
Your a f u kin idiot. 8" you say?? Lmao.


Did you look at the video I just posted a link too?
The concrete section is thinner than the guard rail.
So, fester, you have more accurate info, or is your "instinct" talking.
Seriously, 8" of concrete? Lmao
Originally Posted by mcmurphrjk
So, fester, you have more accurate info, or is your "instinct" talking.


I just happen to live right down the road from the dam and have been there many times.
The original hole was 100 yards across and 40' feet deep. 8" concrete lmao.
Originally Posted by mcmurphrjk
Originally Posted by fester
[quote=mcmurphrjk]
Your a f u kin idiot. 8" you say?? Lmao.


Did you look at the video I just posted a link too?
The concrete section is thinner than the guard rail.


That's a [bleep] sidewalk below the emergency spillway.
Pretty sure it's 8 inches - that's what she hoped... Damm that's a big hole. That's what I said...

Here's some more shots. Rebar can be seen in the bottom pic on the chunk to the right. OR SOMEWHERE. TOOMANYPICS

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]
This whole incident reminds me of bear attacks.

Everybody that wasn't there deserves to not die.




Travis
Thanks for the photos Mtnboom
Sure sure. Maybe this one. Yes this shows it but gotta zoom in. The rebar is fubar.
[Linked Image]
it all wound up in Sacramento!!
Whatever else, they've got one big expensive problem.
BIG asss hole. Can't wait to see what the damage is once the stop dropping water down the spillway.
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm learning a LOT! smirk
Originally Posted by deflave
This whole incident reminds me of bear attacks.

Everybody that wasn't there deserves to not die.




Travis


So everybody here deserves to die?
Refugees without access to their EBT card! Dayammm, when I think of California babes - it ain't that...

[Linked Image]
Rebar fubar
[Linked Image]
Slabs for everyone.
[Linked Image]
Cross there was one picture that when viewed up close you could see the rust lines where the rebar was.

It did not have any pieces hanging out but it looked like the concrete delamanited or something.

Seems they need to redo their inspection process some.
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Refugees without access to their EBT card! Dayammm, when I think of California babes - it ain't that...

[Linked Image]
Rebar fubar
[Linked Image]
Slabs for everyone.
[Linked Image]


Lol. Between funding ebt, tranny bathrooms and Eric holder there is no money for infrastructure repairs.
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm leaning a LOT! smirk


Don't forget the wildlife bios and ag economists... And Political wizzers and conspirists... laugh
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm leaning a LOT! smirk


Don't forget the wildlife bios and ag economists... And Political wizzers and conspirists... laugh


Darn, I did forget those... wink

And, the "BA's" in "Environmental Science"....Gawd, that [bleep] cracks me up!!!
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm leaning a LOT! smirk


Don't forget the wildlife bios and ag economists... And Political wizzers and conspirists... laugh


and boycott mavens!!!
Originally Posted by mcmurphrjk
Looks like plain concrete slope paving. Probably has wire mesh...
Done quite a few channel linings that way.


Not good ones.
Originally Posted by mcmurphrjk
In fairness, once subgrade was lost, not much would stay. Probably not normally reinforced concrete. It looks to be a fairly thin section, probably, from appearances, around 8"


To me it looks like it should be a "tub" instead of two walls poured with the spillway poured after. It leaves a lot less room for error.
We done just use da leftsover chain link fence, that's all da governer would gib us. Don'ts needs no spilzway nohows tain't rained cents fo'three..










Two minutes I'll not get back.
shocked
Lol. The link fence reinforcement looks reusable! Quikrete dumped in the hole should cure before the next storm. F ucking engineers no dik.
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Pretty sure it's 8 inches - that's what she hoped... Damm that's a big hole. That's what I said...

Here's some more shots. Rebar can be seen in the bottom pic on the chunk to the right. OR SOMEWHERE. TOOMANYPICS

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


The average man's hand stretched out spans about 10 inches. Look at the top photo. That slab is a bit more than 8 inches.
How thick? 30"?

[Linked Image]

It's a big un.
[Linked Image]
FAKE NEWS WARNING
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/02/09/ororville-dam-spillway-collapse-may-be-due-to-missing-rebar/

.....

If REBAR was present, we likely would not see such a dramatic collapse as it would have prevented water pressure cavitation from eroding more and more concrete. Concrete is a material that is very strong in compression, but relatively weak in tension. To compensate for this imbalance in concrete’s behavior, rebar is cast into it to carry the tensile loads. This means concrete pulls apart much easier than it is crushable, but with REBAR the tensile force required to pull the concrete apart is greatly increased.

One wonders if that lack of REBAR on the spillway was by design, accident, negligence, or some cost-cutting measure like the lack of life-boats and cheap steel on the Titanic. REBAR in concrete was invented in 1849. It seems incredible to me that it seems to be missing from this very important structure.
It is a might thicker than 8", thanks for the better pictures.
Appears to be slab and beam? More substantial then the video I saw, for sure.
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2017...roville-dam-spillway-previously-patched/


Problems at the Oroville spillway were known.

A picture shot by Lois Cameron from 2013 shows crews examining an issue around the area of the current hole.

“There were some patches needed and so we made repairs and everything checked out,” said Kevin Dossey, a Senior Civil Engineer with the Department of Water Resources. “It looked like it would be able to hold, be able to pass water.”

Dossey says this sort of thing is routine.

It’s common for spillways to develop a void because of the drainage systems under them,” said Dossey.

While everything may have appeared normal back in 2013, 2014, and 2015; what happened Tuesday when the earth gave way, is anything but.

“There wasn’t any evidence that anything more needed to be done,” said Dossey, “repairs were smooth and looked like they were good and secure.”



http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2017...roville-dam-spillway-previously-patched/
Complete ignorance on the location, but will snow melt affect that water shed?
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Complete ignorance on the location, but will snow melt affect that water shed?


Yes

Part of th problem was rain melting snow
They have a good snow pack this year too, correct?
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Complete ignorance on the location, but will snow melt affect that water shed?


Big time.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by tzone
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
[Linked Image]


A guy could get a lot of ducks in that hole.


Given the absolutely SUPERB levels of material strengths and properties of materials available during construction, THAT is one PISS POOR piece of work there, my friend.
The SOB did not "fail from lack of infrastructure maintenance" as proposed by one little cheap shot sniper hiding in the weeds. Well engineered and executed structural concrete's supposed to get STRONGER for it's first century,....and epoxy coated, high tensile re-bar was an accomplished FACT of that day.

That structure was a POS the day they cut the ribbon and headed back for the whorehouse.

GTC


Well said, that's exactly what I was thinking today while I was at work....
Biggest winter in 22 years I read somewhere.
Looking at the weather it looks like they have about 7 days of rain coming starting on Thursday.

What a mess.
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
FAKE NEWS WARNING
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/02/09/ororville-dam-spillway-collapse-may-be-due-to-missing-rebar/

.....

If REBAR was present, we likely would not see such a dramatic collapse as it would have prevented water pressure cavitation from eroding more and more concrete. Concrete is a material that is very strong in compression, but relatively weak in tension. To compensate for this imbalance in concrete’s behavior, rebar is cast into it to carry the tensile loads. This means concrete pulls apart much easier than it is crushable, but with REBAR the tensile force required to pull the concrete apart is greatly increased.

One wonders if that lack of REBAR on the spillway was by design, accident, negligence, or some cost-cutting measure like the lack of life-boats and cheap steel on the Titanic. REBAR in concrete was invented in 1849. It seems incredible to me that it seems to be missing from this very important structure.


Somebody should tell this guy.......rust never sleeps.
We are screwed for the foreseeable future. Snow pack, warm rain, spring melt off....... its going to be interesting.
Farmers always say that you should never complain about rain.

I read that 188,000+ people have evacuated, that is an amazing amount of folks.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Complete ignorance on the location, but will snow melt affect that water shed?


Big time.

+10... And there is a LOT of snow yet to melt .
Crazy, hope and pray for the best, prepare for the worst.
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm leaning a LOT! smirk

A lotta dam experts.
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm learning a LOT! smirk


Please...how 'bout y'all who are spouting sh1t out your AZZES provide some data whereby we engineers and scientists can crunch the numbers and contribute our opinions...which are surely less valid than ignorant stupid f'ing hysteria... amazing...
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm learning a LOT! smirk

A lotta dam experts.


Ooops.

We were posting at the same time...

YEP! DAM(n) experts!!!
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm learning a LOT! smirk

A lotta dam experts.


Ooops.

We were posting at the same time...

YEP! DAM(n) experts!!!



As in:

Ex is a hasbeen...
Pert is a drip under pressure...
What do you want to know about groundwater hydrology?
Even the dams in CA are weak and gay.




Travis
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm leaning a LOT! smirk


Please...how 'bout y'all who are spouting sh1t out your AZZES provide some data whereby we engineers and scientists can crunch the numbers and contribute our opinions...which are surely less valid than ignorant stupid f'ing hysteria... amazing...


What happens when too much water hits a wall of gayness?





Dave
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm leaning a LOT! smirk


Please...how 'bout y'all who are spouting sh1t out your AZZES provide some data whereby we engineers and scientists can crunch the numbers and contribute our opinions...which are surely less valid than ignorant stupid f'ing hysteria... amazing...


What happens when too much water hits a wall of gayness?

Dave


It make's a rainbow.
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
What do you want to know about groundwater hydrology?


Not much, since I minored in hydrology because of a similar event to this that happened when I was in high school and decimated part of MY world...:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teton_Dam
[bleep] it...never mind all of the above. This was the best site for hunters on the web a decade ago...now it is a forum for the cool kids...

Sad...
Originally Posted by Journeyman
[bleep] it...never mind all of the above. This was the best site for hunters on the web a decade ago...now it is a fprum for the cool kids...

Sad...


Travis/Deflave/Clark is not a cool kid.

He is a high functioning alcoholic who has a soiled pillow.

There is a difference
Originally Posted by Journeyman
[bleep] it...never mind all of the above. This was the best site for hunters on the web a decade ago...now it is a forum for the cool kids...

Sad...


The videos of that dam failing were unreal.
7025Jack,

This thread needs to be high jacked.

There is some value to this sight. I called every pawn shop and gun store in Medford, Central Point, and Grants Pass, Oregon this morning looking for a used Weatherby Mark V six lug action. Finally I decided to try here. Someone posted one a little before noon. The caliber was not too important. Tomorrow I will be sending the money.

But generally I agree with you. The number of posters on ignore is getting so big when there is a political post half the poster are on ignore.
Originally Posted by Journeyman
[bleep] it...never mind all of the above. This was the best site for hunters on the web a decade ago...now it is a forum for the cool kids...

Sad...


just need to get off the campfire forum and visit the other forums....right back to a site for hunters
[/quote]
The average man's hand stretched out spans about 10 inches. Look at the top photo. That slab is a bit more than 8 inches. [/quote]

OK, well, I just HAD to go and measure mine... I am 8.5. I feel so, inadequate now.. laugh
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
What do you want to know about groundwater hydrology?


finally, someone that really does know about the subject. smile
Originally Posted by fester
Originally Posted by deflave
This whole incident reminds me of bear attacks.

Everybody that wasn't there deserves to not die.




Travis


So everybody here deserves to die?


Read it again, Pelosi.




Dave
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm learning a LOT! smirk


Please...how 'bout y'all who are spouting sh1t out your AZZES provide some data whereby we engineers and scientists can crunch the numbers and contribute our opinions...which are surely less valid than ignorant stupid f'ing hysteria... amazing...


There is another engineer on here all the time that knows everything. Somebody said he's on vacation but I'm sure he will be along sooner or later and remedy the situation. My personal expertise in this area is limited and crunching #s gets old.

But since you wanted some data to chew on, here you go.

According to Digital Dan, 100,000 cfs = ~750,000 gallons/second. From this simple conversion please determine the size and number of bags needed to haul big rocks into the dam. I don't have specs on the bags such as knots per inch, etc. , but I'm guessing they need to be extra-heavy duty.

Next up we will determine if 223AI is really enough to dislodge said rocks from quarry. I feel a quarter bore would be the minimum, but with these new bullets and powders...
Originally Posted by kid0917
Quote

The average man's hand stretched out spans about 10 inches. Look at the top photo. That slab is a bit more than 8 inches.


OK, well, I just HAD to go and measure mine... I am 8.5. I feel so, inadequate now.. laugh


Hey - I'm right in there with ya at 9.25". 40 years ago I was closer to average, but now, not so much. wink
Whats the Status on the Dam today? I am not seeing much on the news.....
Drain and repair. They have decided to sacrifice the main spillway in order to allow repair to the auxiliary spillway.

Water level is down as they await rain onThursday

Originally Posted by Journeyman
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
What do you want to know about groundwater hydrology?


Not much, since I minored in hydrology because of a similar event to this that happened when I was in high school and decimated part of MY world...:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teton_Dam


Oh, then you majored in sarchasm?
Originally Posted by BMT
Drain and repair. They have decided to sacrifice the main spillway in order to allow repair to the auxiliary spillway.

Water level is down as they await rain onThursday





Not so sure they decided to sacrifice the main spillway, they have no choice.
If they didn't open it the emergency spillway would fail.

The main spillway is eroding it's way up towards the gates. If it reaches the gates a massive failure will happen.

If you look at photos of when the sinkhole first appeared on the main spillway and compare it to recent pic's you will see it's working it's way up towards the gates.

I am sure they core drilled the entire ridge before they built the dam and know exactly where and how deep the bedrock is.


Keep in mind the storms aren't over and the spring run off hasen't even started.

This is not over by a long shot.

Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by fester
Originally Posted by deflave
This whole incident reminds me of bear attacks.

Everybody that wasn't there deserves to not die.




Travis


So everybody here deserves to die?


Read it again, Pelosi.






Dave


I guess you need to open your cum dumpster again and clarify your comment.
Originally Posted by fester
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by fester
Originally Posted by deflave
This whole incident reminds me of bear attacks.

Everybody that wasn't there deserves to not die.




Travis


So everybody here deserves to die?


Read it again, Pelosi.






Dave


I guess you need to open your cum dumpster again and clarify your comment.


Thinking 'flave is missing that "here" means something different to you. And maybe vice-versa.
Originally Posted by BMT


Travis/Deflave/Clark is not a cool kid.

He is a high functioning alcoholic who has a soiled pillow.

There is a difference


An instant classic, this.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm leaning a LOT! smirk


Please...how 'bout y'all who are spouting sh1t out your AZZES provide some data whereby we engineers and scientists can crunch the numbers and contribute our opinions...which are surely less valid than ignorant stupid f'ing hysteria... amazing...


What happens when too much water hits a wall of gayness?

Dave


It make's a rainbow.


A FAAABULOUS rainbow.
Oh....

Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by deflave

What happens when too much water hits a wall of gayness?

Dave


It make's a rainbow.


http://www.trbimg.com/img-589e75ec/turbine/la-me-lake-oroville-spillway-pictures-019/600/600x338
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Journeyman
Wow... Didn't know there were so many structural engineers and groundwater hydrologists here... I'm leaning a LOT! smirk

A lotta dam experts.



Every dam one of them apparently.
Um...

Yeah
Are the almost 200,000 people still being kept away? I'm guessing it will not be the last time this spring.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Are the almost 200,000 people still being kept away? I'm guessing it will not be the last time this spring.


As of this morning, they've canceled the evac order for now.
Yep - it's definitely a fluid situation. sick

Originally Posted by irfubar
This is not over by a long shot.
Good read (s),....and the BEST pics yet

Link: http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidbr...ations-on-the-oroville-dam/#6ea5a5c91925

Link: http://blogs.agu.org/landslideblog/2017/02/14/oroville-dam-site/

Some Geological Observations On The Oroville Dam


David Bressan , CONTRIBUTOR
I deal with the rocky road to our modern understanding of earth

Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.
After copious amounts of rainfall in California in the last weeks, the artificial lake of the Oroville Dam is now filled far above its normal capacity. To hold the lake level at a maximum of 20 feet below the crest of the dam, the additional water can be discharged by a main spillway and an emergency spillway. Last week, cracks and a 300 feet wide hole suddentlyopened in the concrete of the main spillway. After a first inspection of the damage, a discharge test to lower the water level in the lake was undertaken, which caused more damage to the spillway. Reducing the discharge slowed down the damage done to the main spillway. However, Lake Oroville has been rising in response to the reduced outflow at the rate of about half a foot per hour in the last week.

Discharge test February 11, 2017 at the Oroville Dam. In the background the concrete weir and the emergency spillway are visible. The main spillway is already damaged and running water started to erode the left bank of the spillway. Image by William Croyle, California Department of Water Resource, work is in the public domain.
Discharge test February 11 at the Oroville Dam. In the background the concrete weir and the emergency spillway are visible. The main spillway is already damaged and running water started to erode the left bank of the spillway. Image by William Croyle, California Department of Water Resource, work is in the public domain.

As planned, as the lake level rises, the water pours over a concrete weir into the emergency spillway, which is parallel to the main spillway and has a capacity of 15,000 cubic feet per second. However, the actual inflow into the lake is still twice as much as the limited outflow. The unforeseen amount of water (the emergency spillway had never been used since the dam was completed in 1968) started to erode an area of earth downhill the weir.

Discharge test February 11, 2017 at the Oroville Dam. In the background the concrete weir and the emergency spillway are visible. The main spillway is already damaged and running water started to erode the left bank of the spillway. Image by William Croyle, California Department of Water Resource, work is in the public domain.
Discharge test February 11 at the Oroville Dam. In the background the damage done by erosion in the emergency spillway is visible. Image by William Croyle, California Department of Water Resource, work is in the public domain.

The actual danger here is that the headward erosion will erode the slope up to the base of the weir, causing the collapse of the concrete wall of the emergency spillway. (The Oroville Dam itself is at no risk of spillover or even collapse, however). This worst-case scenario would send a 30-foot-wall of water down the Feather River, a tributary to the Sacramento, flooding areas along the Feather and Sacramento River.

According to available geological maps, the Oroville Dam is build on the Smartville ophiolite, consisting of dark grey, steeply-dipping and strongly foliated metamorphic rocks. Once of volcanic origin, erupted in an ancient sea, the rocks were uplifted and metamorphosed during the formation of the Sierra Nevada.

Geological map of Lake Oroville with the Oroville Dam in the lower left corner and geologic legend. Rocks of the Smartville ophiolite in green, tectonic faults are depicted as black lines. California Department of Water Resource, work is in the public domain. Thanks to user @may_gun for the links.

This description seems to match the rocks visible in published photos of the main spillway damage. Some comments have also suggested that the first hole in the main spillway developed above an altered zone of rock, as its more brownish coloration would suggest. Altered rock is more permeable and prone to erosion than massive rock. It's possible that water infiltrated below the concrete of the spillway, eroding the weakened rock until the concrete collapsed into the forming sinkhole. Which means that now running water can directly erode the bedrock, causing more damage (this possible explanation can however only be confirmed by a direct investigation of the exposed rocks).

Metamorphic rocks often cause engineering problems, as such rocks are often folded, resulting in tectonized/fractured areas in an otherwise stable rock mass. Also, the particular structure (the geological correct term is texture) of such rocks poses a problem. Metamorphic foliation forms when elongated or plate-shaped minerals (like micas) are forced by tectonic pressure into a same alignment. Between the minerals the parallel surfaces of the foliation form weak zones, prone to break. If such surfaces are tilted entire packets of rock can easily slip and be washed away by water.

With the emergency spillway the problem is similar, even if the erosion mechanism is not quite the same. The ground around the weir consists of rammed earth (soil consolidated with heavy construction machinery), but the ground of the emergency spillway consists of backfilled soil. This is a cheap and effective method to build dams, but it's also prone to erosion by fast flowing water, especially if the soil becomes soaked with it. Thus, the running water of the spillover is washing away soil, earth and rocks, forming deep gullies. The erosion front is creeping upslope as water flows down the slope.

The great problem now is that neither of the spillways can be used to control the water level in the lake without increasing erosion and damage in one of the spillways. During this storm, using the spillways as much as possible while trying to limit the discharge as much as necessary to slow down the ongoing erosion, the lake level was lowered by 8 feet a day and areas downhill the dam were evacuated as a precautionary measure.
If only the internet had been around at the time the Oroville Dam had been built. Them stupid engineers coulda just came on the fire and asked ol' Crossfire which way is up.

Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
The dam isn't leaking...it isn't that I have "faith in the integrity of the whole show", because this pic shows they were well aware of the damage a LONG time ago...the thing is, this was caused by the operators of the dam...they never needed to slow the releases from the main spillway...they chose instead to let the lake rise to the EMERGENCY spillway and it probably over stressed its design capabilities....notice how quickly they've lowered the level???


I think you're really confused about what's actually going on, mate.

GTC


Originally Posted by crossfireoops
...not sayin I ain't, either.

GTC


thank you for that admission.

Sycamore
Originally Posted by Higbean
If only the internet had been around at the time the Oroville Dam had been built. Them stupid engineers coulda just came on the fire and asked ol' Crossfire which way is up.



If you're suggesting that the crowd of buffoons that put their "stamps' on the pathetic, miserable piles of schiddt that their work represented when that abortion was commissioned, you're dead right.

GTC
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Yep - it's definitely a fluid situation. sick

Originally Posted by irfubar
This is not over by a long shot.


I see what you did there. grin

I'd venture that a rapid loss of the record snowpacks ( say by WARM rains) are going to verify the bolded.

The question of the day being, can the gates / turbine inlets at the dam,cranked wide open, in synch with the main spillway weirs keep the level of that lake BELOW the level of the headwall that comprises the auxilliary spilloff area. I call that a spilloff area cuz' calling it a "spillway" is a phoucin' joke,....and has been a source of confusion in defining WTH is going on up there from the get go.

GTC
Quote
thank you for that admission.

Sycamore


Musta' been bothering you no end.
Hope you're sleeping better now.

Now tell us that you've got the BEST handle on what's gone on over there, and go back to sticking pins in your Ronald Reagan doll.



GTC
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Are the almost 200,000 people still being kept away? I'm guessing it will not be the last time this spring.


Evacuation is changed to a warning -- down from an order

They can go home

Crossfire,

I have read they had to shut the flow off through the turbines because the debris and flow down the main spillway has reversed the the flow in the river below the dam and the generators will be damaged because the water cant flow out?

Not sure if this is true and I have no knowledge about such things, just passing on what I read.

This is Higbeans back yard maybe he has more and better info?
Definitely wonder WTF will happen. This is plenty bad enough already - don't need to go full-on third World. Getting very little confidence from the bags of pebbles in the wake...



I would like to point out, AS AN ASIDE, that I have a KOM Railroader hat...
Quote
Getting very little confidence from the bags of pebbles in the wake...


Given what that last post regarding the geo-morphology of the "bedrock" posits,....IF that lake starts running over that spill wall, bags of pebbles aren't gonna' mean jack diddly schidt, and we'll likely see a very bad situation.

Unseasonably cold and DRY weather would be welcomed.

GTC
This evening I finally returned to my friend's home that I've been staying with for the last two months. I'm currently about a mile away from the Feather River in Gridley California.

SCARY SCHIT !!!

Especially since my buddy's wife works for the DFG and has friends that work for the DWR. There's a whole nother story about what occurred that hasn't been told ... yet.

FWIW, it was psycho getting out of here on Sunday.
WOW - Tell us something juicy!
Originally Posted by fish head
This evening I finally returned to my friend's home that I've been staying with for the last two months. I'm currently about a mile away from the Feather River in Gridley California.

SCARY SCHIT !!!

Especially since my buddy's wife works for the DFG and has friends that work for the DWR. There's a whole nother story about what occurred that hasn't been told ... yet.

FWIW, it was psycho getting out of here on Sunday.


And the "whole nother story" is what ?
Basically, more damage that what's being reported and how close to the schit being spattered all over N Ca it really was.

I heard things today that made my skin crawl.

That's all I have to say about that.
Quote
I heard things today that made my skin crawl.

That's all I have to say about that.



Was it Masons?
Russians...
Originally Posted by fish head
Basically, more damage that what's being reported and how close to the schit being spattered all over N Ca it really was.

I heard things today that made my skin crawl.

That's all I have to say about that.

Thanks, Forrest!
Originally Posted by irfubar
Crossfire,

I have read they had to shut the flow off through the turbines because the debris and flow down the main spillway has reversed the the flow in the river below the dam and the generators will be damaged because the water cant flow out?

Not sure if this is true and I have no knowledge about such things, just passing on what I read.

This is Higbeans back yard maybe he has more and better info?


That doesn't seem to make sense. The water going into the turbines comes in far below the level of the spillway, and IIRC the intake is screened. If they've had to shut down the turbines, there must be something else to it.

It's been several decades since I toured the interior of the facility and can't remember - isn't there a bypass?
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by irfubar
Crossfire,

I have read they had to shut the flow off through the turbines because the debris and flow down the main spillway has reversed the the flow in the river below the dam and the generators will be damaged because the water cant flow out?

Not sure if this is true and I have no knowledge about such things, just passing on what I read.

This is Higbeans back yard maybe he has more and better info?


That doesn't seem to make sense. The water going into the turbines comes in far below the level of the spillway, and IIRC the intake is screened. If they've had to shut down the turbines, there must be something else to it.

It's been several decades since I toured the interior of the facility and can't remember - isn't there a bypass?


I read the same thing; elevated river levels compromising the discharge flow from the plant.
Is that 60 minutes up yet?
Originally Posted by Theo Gallus
Is that 60 minutes up yet?


Longest 60 min ever!
Originally Posted by RufusG
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by irfubar
Crossfire,

I have read they had to shut the flow off through the turbines because the debris and flow down the main spillway has reversed the the flow in the river below the dam and the generators will be damaged because the water cant flow out?

Not sure if this is true and I have no knowledge about such things, just passing on what I read.

This is Higbeans back yard maybe he has more and better info?


That doesn't seem to make sense. The water going into the turbines comes in far below the level of the spillway, and IIRC the intake is screened. If they've had to shut down the turbines, there must be something else to it.

It's been several decades since I toured the interior of the facility and can't remember - isn't there a bypass?


I read the same thing; elevated river levels compromising the discharge flow from the plant.


Well, this is starting to make some sense,....

A.) The backwash / reverse flow / elevated river level from the main spillway hydraulically stalling the turbines ( the discharges of which are not screened ?)
B.) Mandatory use of failing main spillway now dictated by bogus emergency / auxiliary spillway's incipient failure ...
C.) If the weirs feeding the main SW won't handle lake's recharge rate, the emergency / auxiliary SW WILL run ......

....so all this media gas about how the "Manager" were "Controlling" the flows was nothing but more hype,.....

Sounds from here as though Ma nature's taken control of this mess.

All you folks out there have my prayers.

GTC

.
Quote
Was it Masons?


No !!!

[quote][/quote]Russians ?

NO !!!!!

Ronald Reagan plotted alla' this.
OK.

I'll give you this.

The flood gates on the main spillway were in danger of being compromised.

This is what made my skin crawl.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
Was it Masons?


No !!!

Quote
Russians ?

NO !!!!!

Ronald Reagan plotted alla' this.


... meanwhile, Gov Jerry Brown has been throwing temper tantrums over the election results and wasting money on 'socially conscious causes' rather than known infrastructure issues.
The Oroville dam was constructed during Pat Brown tenure as governor.
Pat Brown is Moonbeams father. Pat was governor from 1959 to 1967.
The dam was completed in 1968, Reagan was just there for the opening ceremony.

So as usual Sycamore is misleading us inferring it was Reagan's fault.

Pat Brown was before my time but he had a bad reputation and he spawned moonbeam!

Wouldn't surprise me one bit if there was corruption during construction etc....
Studying this:

[Linked Image]

And This:

[Linked Image]

After reading this:
Quote

According to available geological maps, the Oroville Dam is build on the Smartville ophiolite, consisting of dark grey, steeply-dipping and strongly foliated metamorphic rocks. Once of volcanic origin, erupted in an ancient sea, the rocks were uplifted and metamorphosed during the formation of the Sierra Nevada.
This description seems to match the rocks visible in published photos of the main spillway damage. Some comments have also suggested that the first hole in the main spillway developed above an altered zone of rock, as its more brownish coloration would suggest. Altered rock is more permeable and prone to erosion than massive rock. It's possible that water infiltrated below the concrete of the spillway, eroding the weakened rock until the concrete collapsed into the forming sinkhole. Which means that now running water can directly erode the bedrock, causing more damage (this possible explanation can however only be confirmed by a direct investigation of the exposed rocks).

Metamorphic rocks often cause engineering problems, as such rocks are often folded, resulting in tectonized/fractured areas in an otherwise stable rock mass. Also, the particular structure (the geological correct term is texture) of such rocks poses a problem. Metamorphic foliation forms when elongated or plate-shaped minerals (like micas) are forced by tectonic pressure into a same alignment. Between the minerals the parallel surfaces of the foliation form weak zones, prone to break. If such surfaces are tilted entire packets of rock can easily slip and be washed away by water.


FINALLY gives one the idea of what's in play here,....after days of listening to distorted sound bytes, and listening to talking heads blither mutilated notes provided by panic stricken "Water managers"

GTC
Originally Posted by fish head
OK.

I'll give you this.

The flood gates on the main spillway were in danger of being compromised.

This is what made my skin crawl.


....probably as poorly designed / maintained as the rest of that big pile of schidt.

GTC
Gee, Sycamore being a lying POS again. What were the odds....



http://jaytaylormedia.com/who-will-be-blamed-if-the-oroville-dam-fails/





"In a lengthy analysis of the political battle to win approval for the dam, historian Marc Reisner recounted how Governor Pat Brown — father of the current governor — repeatedly fabricated numbers about the dam’s true cost in order to hoodwink the voters into approving the enormously expensive project through a bond issue in 1959.

Reisner showed that honest estimates concluded the dam would cost approximately 3 billion dollars — more than 20 billion in 2016 dollars — so Brown simply invented a number of 1.75 billion. Reisner concluded that Brown knew that “not one” state would vote for such a huge bond issue, so Brown hid the real cost. To get it passed, Brown did what politicians always do — he engaged in fear-mongering and suggested to Southern California voters that they’d run out of water without the new dam.

But even these methods nearly failed to get the dam approved. 48 of 50 counties in the state voted against the dam. The measure only passed because southern Californians, long used to cheap, subsidized water, were happy to see the rest of the state go into debt to pay for even more water."
Just added a pic / drawing to a post above, sorry I didn't put it there first go round,....I THINK that what we're seeing in that hole immediately below that spill wall IS the actual core structure of the "impervious wall".
The minimalist philosophy that defines the engineering of "Earth Filled Dams" DICTATES that that core structure has to have massive weight (overburden) bearing on it from above,.....
....washing it all away is not a very bright idea, and one has to ask, WTF else did they EXPECT that overburden to do ?

GTC
So we have to ask why Kalifornia has spent so many billions of dollars on funding illegal invading aliens and "Social justice causes", and let their infrastructure decay. If the state government had spent 1/10 as much of their tax moneys on improvements and maintenance over the last 30 years as they have spent on funding invaders, I'd bet these things would not be nearly as threatening as they are.

Just a guess....but worth looking at.

Would that help now?
NO! You can't change the past.

But in the near future, about 200,000 displaced people might be a formidable coalition to start to fix their communist government for the better.

Few things will make people get interested in politics as much as loosing their homes and lifetime investments--- because of political agendas they formerly didn't resist or pay attention to.
Crossfire,
I believe the diagram you gave was of the construction of the dam itself.

The question at this point is the construction of the primary and secondary spillways?

I assume both those structures sit on bedrock.

The report you cited indicates the bedrock is of poor integrity. I believe that's the issue?
The real problem is the DWR filled the lakes too fast and too full. Lake Shasta is also way too full for this time of year The Sacramento River is at flood stage even after days of no rain. I drove past it yesterday and it's as high as I've ever seen it in Redding. At Hamilton City the Sac is only 4 to 6 feet from overflowing the levee.

The DWR phooked up BIG TIME.

This near catastrophe never should have happened.

BTW cross, you've been nailing it.
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by fish head
Basically, more damage that what's being reported and how close to the schit being spattered all over N Ca it really was.

I heard things today that made my skin crawl.

That's all I have to say about that.

Thanks, Forrest!


I am not a smart man, but I do know what flood is.
The lib's in Calif. believed in global warming and thought the new normal in Calif. was perpetual drought.

They didn't believe the reservoir would ever fill again.
FOOLS
Originally Posted by irfubar
The lib's in Calif. believed in global warming and thought the new normal in Calif. was perpetual drought.

They didn't believe the reservoir would ever fill again.
FOOLS


That nails it. They totally bought into the GW BS. Ooops. laugh
Originally Posted by irfubar
Crossfire,
I believe the diagram you gave was of the construction of the dam itself.

The question at this point is the construction of the primary and secondary spillways?

I assume both those structures sit on bedrock.

The report you cited indicates the bedrock is of poor integrity. I believe that's the issue?


All across the crown of that very poor quality "bedrock", their SHOULD be a blasted out 2-3 stories deep excavation that was filled with reinforced concrete tied to the bedrock with grouted in anchors, ....in front of it, on the sloped surface of the "face" ( the lake side) should lie a reinforced deep mat of reinforced concrete. The area onto which these back alley "engineers and water managers" foresaw emergency runoff ? Crap, that should be a MASSIVE slope of Gabien baskets and rip rap, ....anchored and bolted to the
bedrock, as well.
Alla' this WAS out on the table years ago, and was patently ignored, apparently.
GTC
Crossfire,

I believe you have a pretty good handle on how to go about such things.

Whats amazing to me is how the wizards of smart are consistently wrong !

Liberals are plain dangerous, whether it's our infrastructure our economy or foreign policy.
Quote
BTW cross, you've been nailing it.


Thanks, .....damn sure took a while to figure the thing out, though.
Just grabbed this phoucen jewel off a news site

Quote

By late Sunday night, water from Lake Oroville was no longer rushing over the top of the dam’s emergency spillway, thanks to efforts by California water authorities to increase the flow of water out of the reservoir. But the spillways sustained damage during Sunday’s flooding. Officials are attempting to measure ...


DEFINES the root of this problem,....these idiots actually THINK they have "authority" over this, and other primordially forced events.
Us ?.....mushrooms, ....feed 'em schidt and keep em' in the dark.
GTC
I'll be dammed! THNX

Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Studying this:

[Linked Image]

And This:

[Linked Image]

After reading this:
Quote

According to available geological maps, the Oroville Dam is build on the Smartville ophiolite, consisting of dark grey, steeply-dipping and strongly foliated metamorphic rocks. Once of volcanic origin, erupted in an ancient sea, the rocks were uplifted and metamorphosed during the formation of the Sierra Nevada.
This description seems to match the rocks visible in published photos of the main spillway damage. Some comments have also suggested that the first hole in the main spillway developed above an altered zone of rock, as its more brownish coloration would suggest. Altered rock is more permeable and prone to erosion than massive rock. It's possible that water infiltrated below the concrete of the spillway, eroding the weakened rock until the concrete collapsed into the forming sinkhole. Which means that now running water can directly erode the bedrock, causing more damage (this possible explanation can however only be confirmed by a direct investigation of the exposed rocks).

Metamorphic rocks often cause engineering problems, as such rocks are often folded, resulting in tectonized/fractured areas in an otherwise stable rock mass. Also, the particular structure (the geological correct term is texture) of such rocks poses a problem. Metamorphic foliation forms when elongated or plate-shaped minerals (like micas) are forced by tectonic pressure into a same alignment. Between the minerals the parallel surfaces of the foliation form weak zones, prone to break. If such surfaces are tilted entire packets of rock can easily slip and be washed away by water.


FINALLY gives one the idea of what's in play here,....after days of listening to distorted sound bytes, and listening to talking heads blither mutilated notes provided by panic stricken "Water managers"

GTC
I have to admit I am a bit puzzled by the authorities there letting some of the residents return to the area?
Maybe I'm missing something?
I DO believe that the flat red oxide colored surface visible in the lower right central portion of the pic IS the core / headwall of whatever the hell that's supposed to be.
....a "spillway", emergency or otherwise, it sure as hell AIN'T,....

GTC
Originally Posted by szihn
So we have to ask why Kalifornia has spent so many billions of dollars on funding illegal invading aliens and "Social justice causes[/b]", and let their infrastructure decay. If the state government had spent 1/10 as much of their tax moneys on improvements and maintenance over the last 30 years as they have spent on funding invaders, I'd bet these things would not be nearly as threatening as they are.

Just a guess....but worth looking at.

Would that help now?
NO! You can't change the past.

But in the near future, about 200,000 displaced people might be a formidable coalition to start to fix their communist government for the better.

Few things will make people get interested in politics as much as loosing their homes and lifetime investments--- [b]because of political agendas they formerly didn't resist or pay attention to.


infrastructures dont VOTE!
Greg,
It looks more like a giant sinkhole to me. God help those people.
Just a "quick reply"...not to anybody in particular...I'll make a prediction,...... that once the waters recede, we'll see that not only wasn't the main spillway ever in danger of being compromised, but the "emergency" spillway wasn't either...that the erosion we're seeing from the emergency spillway was expected and a concrete apron for the runoff had been proposed years ago. I'm seeing so much misinformation about this it blows my mind....earlier in this thread someone even suggested the laws of physics were reversing the flow of water into the river below and clogging turbines....crazy schitt...

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
I DO believe that the flat red oxide colored surface visible in the lower right central portion of the pic IS the core / headwall of whatever the hell that's supposed to be.
....a "spillway", emergency or otherwise, it sure as hell AIN'T,....

GTC



Crossfire, that red oxide you are looking at is soil.
The area has red soil.
Condensed version

Quote
.I'll make a prediction,...... that once the waters recede, we'll see that not only wasn't the main spillway ever in danger of being compromised, but the "emergency" spillway wasn't either...blah , blah, blah, etc....crazy schitt...


yes, there certainly is some crazy schitt audible this AM

whistle
Originally Posted by BMT
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Are the almost 200,000 people still being kept away? I'm guessing it will not be the last time this spring.


Evacuation is changed to a warning -- down from an order

They can go home



And the waterfowl?

Have the mallards gotten the green light yet?
They really lucked out with the break in the weather.
Originally Posted by 340boy
Greg,
It looks more like a giant sinkhole to me. God help those people.


FLAT perfectly sloped soil after a torrent carved that hole,...nope, the triangular shaped sloped material is a CONCRETE structure, mate. looks to be where it ends,
...that or some of it's GONE.

TC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Condensed version

Quote
.I'll make a prediction,...... that once the waters recede, we'll see that not only wasn't the main spillway ever in danger of being compromised, but the "emergency" spillway wasn't either...blah , blah, blah, etc....crazy schitt...


yes, there certainly is some crazy schitt audible this AM

whistle


grin.....Ok...I'll bump this thread back up after the waters recede whether I'm right or wrong....I MAY be wrong, but I don't think so...You gotta admit though....that gem about water and debris flowing back upstream to clog the turbines was pretty funny....
Quote
that gem about water and debris flowing back upstream to clog the turbines was pretty funny....


Funny ?
You really ARE a bit lost as regards some pretty BASIC hydraulics, aren't you.

You ever seen the bouyed "chain curtains" that are hung in front of the turbine discharges at MOST hydro dams ?
Worked on them during emergency shutdowns to clear logs that made it over a spillway
.....and then were SUCKED back up stream by the vortices ?
soaked to the bloody bone and freezing your nuts off while trying to wield a heavy exothermic torch ?

I doubt it,.....

Maybe you oughta' grab your stash and head for Oroville to calm everybody with your nonsense, it's not going to sell well here, Bud.

GTC
Yeah, if he thinks sheit can't go back the other way, he ain't been around water much.
An entire army of degreed engineers isn't worth what one man with common sense AND intelligence, that knows how and why things work the way they do.

That application of common sense and intelligence ought to be the most important part of an engineer's license test.

But, it's a hard thing to put into an examination.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Yeah, if he thinks sheit can't go back the other way, he ain't been around water much.


Well, you of all people would have a damn good feel for that.

Dealing with the off the wall crap that turns up on these threads is truly a character development exercise.

I just get sorely PISSED at having third grade level child-speak thrown at me by these "media" types,....as noted the distillation of complete gibberish handed them by factotums that are paid , VERY well paid to behave and speak as scientists,.....not a herd of azz covering political bag lickers.
This all becomes REALLY important , now that we begin looking inward at our infrastructure,....a "test case" as it were.
The original prints for the contracts let on this dam reside somewhere,....let's hope they don't get "destroyed by mildew and mold" the way the ones for the Nimitz Freeway so conveniently were.

GTC
Originally Posted by szihn
So we have to ask why Kalifornia has spent so many billions of dollars on funding illegal invading aliens and "Social justice causes", and let their infrastructure decay. If the state government had spent 1/10 as much of their tax moneys on improvements and maintenance over the last 30 years as they have spent on funding invaders, I'd bet these things would not be nearly as threatening as they are.

Just a guess....but worth looking at.

Would that help now?
NO! You can't change the past.

But in the near future, about 200,000 displaced people might be a formidable coalition to start to fix their communist government for the better.

Few things will make people get interested in politics as much as loosing their homes and lifetime investments--- because of political agendas they formerly didn't resist or pay attention to.


The counties in trouble voted red. Hell most of Northern California above sac and the gay area is red.
Originally Posted by fester
I guess you need to open your cum dumpster again and clarify your comment.


Probably a regional thing but you should know that most men don't use their mouths for that.

Be sure to floss.



Thanks,
Dave
Yeah, I'll give it to Butte county, Brown didn't even win there.

Unfortunately, they know what the rest of the flyover states know.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by 340boy
Greg,
It looks more like a giant sinkhole to me. God help those people.


FLAT perfectly sloped soil after a torrent carved that hole,...nope, the triangular shaped sloped material is a CONCRETE structure, mate. looks to be where it ends,
...that or some of it's GONE.

TC


I've lost track - which photo are you speaking of?
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Condensed version

Quote
.I'll make a prediction,...... that once the waters recede, we'll see that not only wasn't the main spillway ever in danger of being compromised, but the "emergency" spillway wasn't either...blah , blah, blah, etc....crazy schitt...


yes, there certainly is some crazy schitt audible this AM

whistle


What everybody will eventually find out is how close to the equivalent of a friggin' nuclear bomb going off that it really was. I'm not a religious man but Thank God the worst didn't occur.

The Sheriff of Butte County did the right thing in issuing the mandatory evacuation order.

IMHO, it won't be all clear until they get the lake down another hundred feet plus. Odds are we're safe enough for now though.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
that gem about water and debris flowing back upstream to clog the turbines was pretty funny....


Funny ?
You really ARE a bit lost as regards some pretty BASIC hydraulics, aren't you.

You ever seen the bouyed "chain curtains" that are hung in front of the turbine discharges at MOST hydro dams ?
Worked on them during emergency shutdowns to clear logs that made it over a spillway
.....and then were SUCKED back up stream by the vortices ?
soaked to the bloody bone and freezing your nuts off while trying to wield a heavy exothermic torch ?

I doubt it,.....

Maybe you oughta' grab your stash and head for Oroville to calm everybody with your nonsense, it's not going to sell well here, Bud.

GTC


I'm not gonna start hurling insults, but the way I understood that post had nothing at all to do "buoyed" steel curtains in front of turbines....it was the suggestion that somehow the river level below the dam was high enough to force water and debris back up into the turbines and back uphill into the lake....it's IMPOSSIBLE for that to happen...
Interesting that Pat Brown resided over the planning, financing and construction over the dam.

And his son Jerry Brown resided over the maintenance, and both appeared to have failed.
No one said anything about back to Lake level... it is about stalling turbines due to erratic flow and compromised outlets. Plenty enough to get crap back into the turbines.
Originally Posted by fish head

The Sheriff of Butte County did the right thing in issuing the mandatory evacuation order.

IMHO, it won't be all clear until they get the lake down another hundred feet plus. Odds are we're safe enough for now though.


I totally agree with this part...but it was also a situation that was caused by the DWR operators who made the bad decision to reduce the flows enough to allow water over the emergency spillway in the first place...there are reports from a LONG ways back that address the erosion that would happen from the emergency spillway and a concrete "apron" had been proposed YEARS ago.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by RufusG
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by irfubar
Crossfire,

I have read they had to shut the flow off through the turbines because the debris and flow down the main spillway has reversed the the flow in the river below the dam and the generators will be damaged because the water cant flow out?

Not sure if this is true and I have no knowledge about such things, just passing on what I read.

This is Higbeans back yard maybe he has more and better info?


That doesn't seem to make sense. The water going into the turbines comes in far below the level of the spillway, and IIRC the intake is screened. If they've had to shut down the turbines, there must be something else to it.

It's been several decades since I toured the interior of the facility and can't remember - isn't there a bypass?


I read the same thing; elevated river levels compromising the discharge flow from the plant.


Well, this is starting to make some sense,....

A.) The backwash / reverse flow / elevated river level from the main spillway hydraulically stalling the turbines ( the discharges of which are not screened ?)......
.


Honest question here....

The intakes for the turbines are two giant "tubes" running down the slope on the south side of the reservoir. They're screened on top, and, IIRC, have gates to choose at which level the water is allowed in. They can therefore take water from a much higher pressure than the water backing up at the discharge. How can that stall the turbines?

Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
that gem about water and debris flowing back upstream to clog the turbines was pretty funny....


Funny ?
You really ARE a bit lost as regards some pretty BASIC hydraulics, aren't you.

You ever seen the bouyed "chain curtains" that are hung in front of the turbine discharges at MOST hydro dams ?
Worked on them during emergency shutdowns to clear logs that made it over a spillway
.....and then were SUCKED back up stream by the vortices ?
soaked to the bloody bone and freezing your nuts off while trying to wield a heavy exothermic torch ?

I doubt it,.....

Maybe you oughta' grab your stash and head for Oroville to calm everybody with your nonsense, it's not going to sell well here, Bud.

GTC


I'm not gonna start hurling insults, but the way I understood that post had nothing at all to do "buoyed" steel curtains in front of turbines....it was the suggestion that somehow the river level below the dam was high enough to force water and debris back up into the turbines and back uphill into the lake....it's IMPOSSIBLE for that to happen...




Not impossible at all! The main spillway discharge enters the river channel at a 90deg. angle, easy to see how it could flow both ways with enough volume.

It will never back up to lake level, but could back up enough to affect the turbines discharge.
I haven't heard anything, from the inside skinny, about the turbines being affected but if happened I should find out in the next few days.

Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by 340boy
Greg,
It looks more like a giant sinkhole to me. God help those people.


FLAT perfectly sloped soil after a torrent carved that hole,...nope, the triangular shaped sloped material is a CONCRETE structure, mate. looks to be where it ends,
...that or some of it's GONE.

TC


I've lost track - which photo are you speaking of?


Oh - this photo?...

Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Studying this:

[Linked Image]


How about another angle?

[Linked Image]

That ain't no core.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
No one said anything about back to Lake level... it is about stalling turbines due to erratic flow and compromised outlets. Plenty enough to get crap back into the turbines.


What "eratic flow"??? You'd need either a lid on the lake creating a vacuum or giant whirlpools sucking air before anything like that could happen.... And you can compromise the outlet as much as you want....the hydro pressure from above will not allow a backflow....like I said, it's against the laws of physics...
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by fester
I guess you need to open your cum dumpster again and clarify your comment.


Probably a regional thing but you should know that most men don't use their mouths for that.

Be sure to floss.



Thanks,
Dave



Ooh. Burn.

You didn't clarify your comment, c ock gobbler.
That's an access road below the emergency spillway...
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
that gem about water and debris flowing back upstream to clog the turbines was pretty funny....


Funny ?
You really ARE a bit lost as regards some pretty BASIC hydraulics, aren't you.

You ever seen the bouyed "chain curtains" that are hung in front of the turbine discharges at MOST hydro dams ?
Worked on them during emergency shutdowns to clear logs that made it over a spillway
.....and then were SUCKED back up stream by the vortices ?
soaked to the bloody bone and freezing your nuts off while trying to wield a heavy exothermic torch ?

I doubt it,.....

Maybe you oughta' grab your stash and head for Oroville to calm everybody with your nonsense, it's not going to sell well here, Bud.

GTC


I'm not gonna start hurling insults, but the way I understood that post had nothing at all to do "buoyed" steel curtains in front of turbines....it was the suggestion that somehow the river level below the dam was high enough to force water and debris back up into the turbines and back uphill into the lake....it's IMPOSSIBLE for that to happen...


Read what Steelhead posted
....include my dittos
Your initial post was pretty damned rude and insulting, and you're getting nothing more back than that sorta' stupid wise azzed nonsense deserves.
Quote
That ain't no core.


it's a picture of a different part of that abortion, somewhat far removed, I believe.

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
That ain't no core.


it's a picture of a different part of that abortion, somewhat far removed, I believe.

GTC


So far removed that it isn't part of the actual structure. And by that, I mean where material was moved and built up. It's just a road on the ridge under the lip of the concrete apron that is the emergency spillway - which goes over the existing ridge.
Quote

Not impossible at all! The main spillway discharge enters the river channel at a 90deg. angle, easy to see how it could flow both ways with enough volume.

It will never back up to lake level, but could back up enough to affect the turbines discharge.


Yup, the increased back pressure starts STALLING the turbines, and computer controlled respond by increasing the excitation voltages,....bad electrical catastrophes ensue. In the case of debris actually being inducted, the almost incalculable forces involved can break the shafts / gear trains
......the equivalent of a powerful bomb going off.

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by 340boy
Greg,
It looks more like a giant sinkhole to me. God help those people.


FLAT perfectly sloped soil after a torrent carved that hole,...nope, the triangular shaped sloped material is a CONCRETE structure, mate. looks to be where it ends,
...that or some of it's GONE.

TC


Greg,
I think I 'misspoke'. I should have said that your photo reminded me of a giant sinkhole. Didn't mean it in the literal sense.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
That ain't no core.


it's a picture of a different part of that abortion, somewhat far removed, I believe.

GTC


So far removed that it isn't part of the actual structure. And by that, I mean where material was moved and built up. It's just a road on the ridge under the lip of the concrete apron that is the emergency spillway - which goes over the existing ridge.


OK, so WHAT is pictured in the first pic I posted this AM ? It damn sure isn't that "different angle" schidt.

DIFFERENT SPOT, and your call out on being lost is a good one.

Look it all over again, carefully this time, you should see what we mean.

GTC
I wouldn't call it a sinkhole, so much as a washout,....but that's a small beer at this point.

The point being is that the WEIGHT of the missing strata is what HOLDS the grout curtain and sub wall in place against the forces being applied on the lake side.

a shisttitic formation capped with schidty engineering.

GTC
I'm just seeing a LOT of misinformation and outright speculation being put forth as FACT posted here....kind of like what the MSM is putting out, and most of it is BS hyperbole....
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
I'm just seeing a LOT of misinformation and outright speculation being put forth as FACT posted here....kind of like what the MSM is putting out, and most of it is BS hyperbole....



Well this is a high stakes dilemma. The authorities are giving out misinformation and that fuels speculation.

Wish I had more confidence in the wizards of smart.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
That ain't no core.


it's a picture of a different part of that abortion, somewhat far removed, I believe.

GTC


So far removed that it isn't part of the actual structure. And by that, I mean where material was moved and built up. It's just a road on the ridge under the lip of the concrete apron that is the emergency spillway - which goes over the existing ridge.


OK, so WHAT is pictured in the first pic I posted this AM ? It damn sure isn't that "different angle" schidt.

DIFFERENT SPOT, and your call out on being lost is a good one.

Look it all over again, carefully this time, you should see what we mean.

GTC


So now I am really scratching my head. That was not the first photo you posted this AM? I can't find another earlier. And yes - that one and the one I posted below it are the exact same spot.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote

Not impossible at all! The main spillway discharge enters the river channel at a 90deg. angle, easy to see how it could flow both ways with enough volume.

It will never back up to lake level, but could back up enough to affect the turbines discharge.


Yup, the increased back pressure starts STALLING the turbines, and computer controlled respond by increasing the excitation voltages,....bad electrical catastrophes ensue. In the case of debris actually being inducted, the almost incalculable forces involved can break the shafts / gear trains
......the equivalent of a powerful bomb going off.

GTC


So, if that is all correct, I take it simply that fluctuating backpressure is a very bad thing - and that makes sense. Still, for some reason, I had thought I remembered there being a way to let water pass through without spinning the turbines - but as I said, it was a long time ago when I saw it all close up.
It doesn't appear as though the spillway is part of the actual dam itself but is instead part of the surrounding landscape?

[Linked Image]
Snakeriver,
Correct the spillways are on an adjacent ridge, separate from the dam.
Originally Posted by Snake River Marksman
It doesn't appear as though the spillway is part of the actual dam itself but is instead part of the surrounding landscape?

[Linked Image]


And not only that, a lot of people (not necessarily pointing at anyone here) are assuming the the structure and the ridge below the waterline are essentially vertical, which, of course is far from the truth.

That is not to say that a catastrophic failure is impossible, but it would be an (admittedly huge and accelerated) erosion event - not a collapse, as so many seem to fear.
Originally Posted by Snake River Marksman
It doesn't appear as though the spillway is part of the actual dam itself but is instead part of the surrounding landscape?

[Linked Image]


Originally Posted by irfubar
Snakeriver,
Correct the spillways are on an adjacent ridge, separate from the dam.


And for good reason. As bad as the damage looks to the primary spill way there is no threat from it to the main dam structure.
I have seen another image that shows an emergency spill way to the left of the damaged one. Over nothing but raw terrain. That seems to be a Hail Mary situation to save the main dam structure. There is a lot of stuff that can be controled at this point, but how much water ends up coming down that water shed is NOT one of them.
Quote
And yes - that one and the one I posted below it are the exact same spot.


Nope,....LOOK at the photos posted WAY back,....two different washouts.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
And yes - that one and the one I posted below it are the exact same spot.


Nope,....LOOK at the photos posted WAY back,....two different washouts.


Begging mercy here. Help a fella out and point the photo out please.
Originally Posted by tndrbstr
Originally Posted by Snake River Marksman
It doesn't appear as though the spillway is part of the actual dam itself but is instead part of the surrounding landscape?

[Linked Image]


Originally Posted by irfubar
Snakeriver,
Correct the spillways are on an adjacent ridge, separate from the dam.


And for good reason. As bad as the damage looks to the primary spill way there is no threat from it to the main dam structure.
I have seen another image that shows an emergency spill way to the left of the damaged one. Over nothing but raw terrain. That seems to be a Hail Mary situation to save the main dam structure. There is a lot of stuff we can control at this point, but how much water ends up coming down that water shed is NOT one of them.


The geometry I'm seeing, and the repeated call out of "30 feet" indicates that that spill wall over the un clad "ridge" is 30 feet in height, and the sucker sure looks like it could blow out.

Hope not.

ALL predicated on the two OTHER routes of drainage being able to carry the high volume runoff anticipated.

GTC
The spillway is part of the dam
Quote


Honest question here....

The intakes for the turbines are two giant "tubes" running down the slope on the south side of the reservoir. They're screened on top, and, IIRC, have gates to choose at which level the water is allowed in. They can therefore take water from a much higher pressure than the water backing up at the discharge. How can that stall the turbines?



The turbines use most of that head up doing work turning the generator. The discharge is at a much lower pressure.
Quote

The turbines use most of that head up doing work turning the generator. The discharge is at a much lower pressure.


Yup,....and THANKS for pointing this out.

GTC
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The spillway is part of the dam


At the top, it is.

Cross - what I have read is that core samples showed that bedrock begins 30' below the emergency spillway. It is expected that erosion would undercut the concrete apron to that point in short order, but then stop or be significantly slowed.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
And yes - that one and the one I posted below it are the exact same spot.


Nope,....LOOK at the photos posted WAY back,....two different washouts.


Begging mercy here. Help a fella out and point the photo out please.


The upper photo in YOUR post is the one I first posted this AM,....get it ?

It is NOT the same area as your "different angle" photo below,...

sorry you can't see that.

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
And yes - that one and the one I posted below it are the exact same spot.


Nope,....LOOK at the photos posted WAY back,....two different washouts.


Begging mercy here. Help a fella out and point the photo out please.


The upper photo in YOUR post is the one I first posted this AM,....get it ?

It is NOT the same area as your "different angle" photo below,...

sorry you can't see that.

GTC


You are so obviously wrong, that I can hardly believe it. Look some more.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The spillway is part of the dam


At the top, it is.

Cross - what I have read is that core samples showed that bedrock begins 30' below the emergency spillway. It is expected that erosion would undercut the concrete apron to that point in short order, but then stop or be significantly slowed.


I should have worded it differently. Just saying that the auxiliary is connected to the dam, which some said it isn't. Sure it's not part of the concrete dam, but an earthen dam is still a dam.

Same spot again - different angle....

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The spillway is part of the dam


At the top, it is.

Cross - what I have read is that core samples showed that bedrock begins 30' below the emergency spillway. It is expected that erosion would undercut the concrete apron to that point in short order, but then stop or be significantly slowed.


I should have worded it differently. Just saying that the auxiliary is connected to the dam, which some said it isn't. Sure it's not part of the concrete dam, but an earthen dam is still a dam.



Oh the aux. No - that is on the ridge next to the dam. That ridge was there before the dam was built.

Ridge in background...

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by 340boy
Greg,
It looks more like a giant sinkhole to me. God help those people.


FLAT perfectly sloped soil after a torrent carved that hole,...nope, the triangular shaped sloped material is a CONCRETE structure, mate. looks to be where it ends,
...that or some of it's GONE.

TC


I've lost track - which photo are you speaking of?


Oh - this photo?...

Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Studying this:

[Linked Image]


How about another angle?

[Linked Image]

That ain't no core.



These photo's are of the same hole. The people are standing on a eroded roadbed, not at the base of the spillway headwall
Been years since I calculated hydraulic pressures for x feet deep water, and never have designed a dam.

It's certainly possible the outflows could be too high to control, and cause flooding downstream. especially if part of the emergency spillway breaks loose, and lets more water over the dam unexpectedly.

But the whole dam fail and let a 700 foot wall of water loose? I don't see that happening.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The spillway is part of the dam


At the top, it is.

Cross - what I have read is that core samples showed that bedrock begins 30' below the emergency spillway. It is expected that erosion would undercut the concrete apron to that point in short order, but then stop or be significantly slowed.


I should have worded it differently. Just saying that the auxiliary is connected to the dam, which some said it isn't. Sure it's not part of the concrete dam, but an earthen dam is still a dam.



EXACTLY,....the entire length of that face, whether the "actual dam" or the "Ridge" should be tied together on a linear axis AND vertical or angular axis) with MASSIVE high tensile cable, rebar, grouted in anchors,....let me add "rustproof,....e,g. Epoxy or Hot dipp galvy,.....and said tie entombed in some volume of erosion proof overburden.

not there, .....is it ?

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The spillway is part of the dam


At the top, it is.

Cross - what I have read is that core samples showed that bedrock begins 30' below the emergency spillway. It is expected that erosion would undercut the concrete apron to that point in short order, but then stop or be significantly slowed.


I should have worded it differently. Just saying that the auxiliary is connected to the dam, which some said it isn't. Sure it's not part of the concrete dam, but an earthen dam is still a dam.



EXACTLY,....the entire length of that face, whether the "actual dam" or the "Ridge" should be tied together on a linear axis AND vertical or angular axis) with MASSIVE high tensile cable, rebar, grouted in anchors,....let me add "rustproof,....e,g. Epoxy or Hot dipp galvy,.....and said tie entombed in some volume of erosion proof overburden.

not there, .....is it ?

GTC


But then it wouldn't be an earth-fill dam. wink Not arguing that point...at this point.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The spillway is part of the dam


At the top, it is.

Cross - what I have read is that core samples showed that bedrock begins 30' below the emergency spillway. It is expected that erosion would undercut the concrete apron to that point in short order, but then stop or be significantly slowed.


I should have worded it differently. Just saying that the auxiliary is connected to the dam, which some said it isn't. Sure it's not part of the concrete dam, but an earthen dam is still a dam.



Oh the aux. No - that is on the ridge next to the dam. That ridge was there before the dam was built.

Ridge in background...

[Linked Image]


So if you remove that ridge, lake level will not change?
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The spillway is part of the dam


At the top, it is.

Cross - what I have read is that core samples showed that bedrock begins 30' below the emergency spillway. It is expected that erosion would undercut the concrete apron to that point in short order, but then stop or be significantly slowed.


I should have worded it differently. Just saying that the auxiliary is connected to the dam, which some said it isn't. Sure it's not part of the concrete dam, but an earthen dam is still a dam.




And as such, from the day it is constructed it is looking for a chance to fail (although not with the fervor of a levee).
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steelhead
The spillway is part of the dam


At the top, it is.

Cross - what I have read is that core samples showed that bedrock begins 30' below the emergency spillway. It is expected that erosion would undercut the concrete apron to that point in short order, but then stop or be significantly slowed.


I should have worded it differently. Just saying that the auxiliary is connected to the dam, which some said it isn't. Sure it's not part of the concrete dam, but an earthen dam is still a dam.



Oh the aux. No - that is on the ridge next to the dam. That ridge was there before the dam was built.

Ridge in background...

[Linked Image]


So if you remove that ridge, lake level will not change?


I never said that. Just that the material under the aux is not earth fill. It's (apparently) 30' of whatever was already there over bedrock. That first 30' - nobody expects that to last long.
You fellas are right about that hole by the road,....there's another deep hole further out that spill wall, and I figured THAT was what the enlarged showed.

Once again,....SMALL beer within the context of the geo-morphology of that "ridge".

Calling that crap, "Bedrock" is a travesty,...

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
You fellas are right about that hole by the road,....there's another deep hole further out that spill wall, and I figured THAT was what the enlarged showed.

Once again,....SMALL beer within the context of the geo-morphology of that "ridge".

Calling that crap, "Bedrock" is a travesty,...

GTC


Kinda doubt that any of what we are seeing under the aux is bedrock - yet. I know that the other end of the dam is very much against solid bedrock. Seen it from the inside. Supposedly, they took core samples on the spillway side, but I have no idea how extensive or complete to information that provided. I don't think I;d want to lay all my hopes on erosion stopping at 30' - but that seems to be the accepted wisdom there.

Interesting propaganda video here....

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/infrastructure/a25209/oroville-dam-sunny-future/
Is the Golden Gate Bridge in danger? All that water ends up in SF Bay, so if enough dams let out too much it should overwhelm the bay.
Have you READ the geo-morphology eval and classification that I posted about this "Bedrock ?"

GTC

Originally Posted by kennyd
Is the Golden Gate Bridge in danger? All that water ends up in SF Bay, so if enough dams let out too much it should overwhelm the bay.


Not hardly.
For me a relevant question is did they extend the base of both spillways to bedrock?

Not sure if they have disclosed that?

If both spillways are anchored to the bedrock with the method Greg explained earlier they have a chance even if the soil erodes around them?

And yes Steelhead, technically the "ridge" is acting as part of the dam.
The ridge goes and so does lake water.

Spillway and or ridge failure will result in approximately the top 30 feet of the reservoir spilling down the valley, that's a chitload of water.

The dam itself failing is a bigger disaster with the entire contents of the reservoir fooding down the valley.
The dam appears sound at this point.

And to be clear for people who haven't been following this, the spillway is not on the earth filled main dam.
Many dams have the spillway on the face, this one does not.
So - this info they're putting out about 30' to the bedrock meaning only a 30' wall of water would imply that the concrete emergency "spillway" - which is, in fact, at least on the south end, actually a section of dam itself (because of the natural slope in that direction)...is embedded directly upon bedrock. I guess. Or not....

Fester has reasons to be worried. Someone is downplaying this for sure.
Rather than looking at this as a place to vent, fling schidt, we should be taking the LONG view at this and asking,....do we WANT to continue to trust the "leadership" and "authority" emanating from Sacramento California ?

Do you want to DEFEND this kind of blatantly stupid, "engineering?".... or see the end of it's era ?

This infrastructure restoration,repair,remediation is going to be a hot button issue.

Look at some of the stupidity ALREADY being posted by left-lib media about how this illustrates why Trump's initiative HAS to fail, fer chrissake.

GTC

GTC
Originally Posted by FreeMe
So - this info they're putting out about 30' to the bedrock meaning only a 30' wall of water would imply that the concrete emergency "spillway" - which is, in fact, at least on the south end, actually a section of dam itself (because of the natural slope in that direction)...is embedded directly upon bedrock. I guess. Or not....

Fester has reasons to be worried. Someone is downplaying this for sure.


The 30' wall of water would be if the dam was filled to top and the 30' cap of the emergency spillway failed.

What isn't being addressed is the failure of the main spillway, a failure that is well below the top of the dam and if that failure led to the dam failing at that level...
Originally Posted by 458 Lott
Originally Posted by FreeMe
So - this info they're putting out about 30' to the bedrock meaning only a 30' wall of water would imply that the concrete emergency "spillway" - which is, in fact, at least on the south end, actually a section of dam itself (because of the natural slope in that direction)...is embedded directly upon bedrock. I guess. Or not....

Fester has reasons to be worried. Someone is downplaying this for sure.


The 30' wall of water would be if the dam was filled to top and the 30' cap of the emergency spillway failed.

What isn't being addressed is the failure of the main spillway, a failure that is well below the top of the dam and if that failure led to the dam failing at that level...


No, I think you're mistaken.
The concrete apron of the emergency spillway abuts the main spillway, and appears to be close to the depth of the main spillway. Whether it allows water to spill over clear up to the main spillway is unclear to me, but if that concrete apron lets go, along with whatever erosion follows, it will be just as bad.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
So - this info they're putting out about 30' to the bedrock meaning only a 30' wall of water would imply that the concrete emergency "spillway" - which is, in fact, at least on the south end, actually a section of dam itself (because of the natural slope in that direction)...is embedded directly upon bedrock. I guess. Or not....

Fester has reasons to be worried. Someone is downplaying this for sure.


I'll tell you what,....you knock a hole 3' wide at the top of that miserable joke, and watch just how quickly that 30' for the full width goes away,....and the presumption that all will be well in la-la engineering land and loss of the ridge line will stop there is just that,....presumption.
Picture the 30 feet gone, and then ponder the phenomena called CAVITATION.

GTC

Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by FreeMe
So - this info they're putting out about 30' to the bedrock meaning only a 30' wall of water would imply that the concrete emergency "spillway" - which is, in fact, at least on the south end, actually a section of dam itself (because of the natural slope in that direction)...is embedded directly upon bedrock. I guess. Or not....

Fester has reasons to be worried. Someone is downplaying this for sure.


I'll tell you what,....you knock a hole 3' wide at the top of that miserable joke, and watch just how quickly that 30' for the full width goes away,....and the presumption that all will be well in la-la engineering land and loss of the ridge line will stop there is just that,....presumption.
Picture the 30 feet gone, and then ponder the phenomena called CAVITATION.

GTC



Absolutely.
Originally Posted by 458 Lott
Originally Posted by FreeMe
So - this info they're putting out about 30' to the bedrock meaning only a 30' wall of water would imply that the concrete emergency "spillway" - which is, in fact, at least on the south end, actually a section of dam itself (because of the natural slope in that direction)...is embedded directly upon bedrock. I guess. Or not....

Fester has reasons to be worried. Someone is downplaying this for sure.


The 30' wall of water would be if the dam was filled to top and the 30' cap of the emergency spillway failed.

What isn't being addressed is the failure of the main spillway, a failure that is well below the top of the dam and if that failure led to the dam failing at that level...


Yup, a 10X and right on the money

again, think cavitation

That headwall and grout curtain are ONLY valid with OVERBURDEN holing em' down.
Scout swims very well but just in case ...

[Linked Image]

Here is a link to historic pictures when they built the damn.

As you can see the areas that are eroding, don't seem to have been re-enforced, so they could basically result in an new channel right around the existing damn.

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/multim...ia-Water-Reservoir-Photos-413590093.html

The Teton Dam was not even close to full when it failed...
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
The Teton Dam was not even close to full when it failed...


Different causes there though. Nothing to do with the spillway. IIRC, erosion didn't begin at the top.
Originally Posted by Spotshooter

Here is a link to historic pictures when they built the damn.

As you can see the areas that are eroding, don't seem to have been re-informed, so they could basically result in an new channel right around the existing damn.

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/multim...ia-Water-Reservoir-Photos-413590093.html



That's the rub,....lose 30', and that whole schitaree below's likely to go away, too.

GTC
Here's a good one from the link Spotshooter posted.

[Linked Image]

It seems to me like they're blowing away the "bedrock" with just a firehose or ...

Maybe they're just cleaning it up a bit. smile

Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Rather than looking at this as a place to vent, fling schidt, we should be taking the LONG view at this and asking,....do we WANT to continue to trust the "leadership" and "authority" emanating from Sacramento California ?

Do you want to DEFEND this kind of blatantly stupid, "engineering?".... or see the end of it's era ?

This infrastructure restoration,repair,remediation is going to be a hot button issue.

Look at some of the stupidity ALREADY being posted by left-lib media about how this illustrates why Trump's initiative HAS to fail, fer chrissake.

GTC

GTC


I have a feeling that this is not the only spot in America failing due to negligence among other things. America in general needs a good overhaul.
Originally Posted by fester
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Rather than looking at this as a place to vent, fling schidt, we should be taking the LONG view at this and asking,....do we WANT to continue to trust the "leadership" and "authority" emanating from Sacramento California ?

Do you want to DEFEND this kind of blatantly stupid, "engineering?".... or see the end of it's era ?

This infrastructure restoration,repair,remediation is going to be a hot button issue.

Look at some of the stupidity ALREADY being posted by left-lib media about how this illustrates why Trump's initiative HAS to fail, fer chrissake.

GTC

GTC


I have a feeling that this is not the only spot in America failing due to negligence among other things. America in general needs a good overhaul.


Hmmm, seems like some guy that's been in the news a lot lately has been saying this very thing for about a year or so.
Time to either eliminate the free life or do work for it/them.
More of this IS going to happen if we don't start doing major infrastructure work.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
The Teton Dam was not even close to full when it failed...


Different causes there though. Nothing to do with the spillway. IIRC, erosion didn't begin at the top.


Could not have been erosion from the top because the dam was not close to full. Water made its way through the earthen fill dam and cavitated some hellacious holes pronto.

The Oroville Dam could fail in essentially the same way if water makes it through the "bedrock."
Quote
"bedrock"


Glad to see you putting that in quotes,...and dead certain that with the project at completion seeing available funding (to steal) available, some serious stabilization of a very poor that was probably called out on the original prints was bypassed, omitted, lied about, and swept under the rug.
...and again, witness the Nimitz Freeway for the same ethical code failures.

GTC

Originally Posted by fish head
Here's a good one from the link Spotshooter posted.

[Linked Image]

It seems to me like they're blowing away the "bedrock" with just a firehose or ...

Maybe they're just cleaning it up a bit. smile



They're prepping it for an acid wash, and some gunnite, prior to starting a big pour.

Man, the shots of those boys cad welding that humongous rebar brings back a memory or two. No masks, ....get er' done and have a smoke,....kaff, kaff, kaff,... grin
Yup, and people do not realize how lucky folks were the Teton Dam collapsed while being filled instead of 130' below the top. The next 100' was a Hell of a lot more water than the first.

There was also similar "bedrock" there that was the problem. And it was volcanic tuff as I recall with better properties than foliated basalt.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer

Could not have been erosion from the top because the dam was not close to full. Water made its way through the earthen fill dam and cavitated some hellacious holes pronto.


Art....the water would never have flowed out of the emergency spillway if the lake weren't full...and the lake would have never completely filled if the DWR people hadn't cut the flow back on the main spillway from the 90K + CFS they were releasing prior to the decision to cut the flow and try out the emergency spillway. On top of it all, I seriously doubt the "EMERGENCY" spillway was designed to operate with the main spillway gates over half way closed.

Follow the money...
Quote
volcanic tuff as I recall with better properties than foliated basalt.


You'd have to work hard to find a much WORSE material than foliated basalt with all that schist the "foliant" for a subgrade / anchor point.
This on a heavily faulted tectonic zone ? crazy

GTC
Just a question to ponder. At some point this discussion is all about money.

Could the dam have been built "better"? Sure. At what price?

It's easy to armchair quarterback this 40 years later. At the time this dam was being built I'm sure it was millions over budget and people were screaming and ranting to stop the pointless expenditures.

The Sierra Club and other organizations stated that there was a need to do certain things - like concrete over the entire top/pathway of the emergency spillway. I'm sure that would have only added another $25mm (*in 1967 dollars) to the project. That's money the state really didn't have at the time.

At some point, we have all been faced with the money vs. quality aspect of things. Maybe it was personally (*could have installed the better grade vinyl windows...) or professionally (*maybe hired a better worker). No matter, at some point, it's a balancing act.

Today, the issue is the mismanagement of letting the water get so high that the spillway needed to be used. That's certainly worth discussion. We had means to mitigate risk and that wasn't done. That's still the answer I want to hear about. Maybe I missed the answer...so if someone has it I'd like to know.

The rest of this...blaming the past and armchair quarterbacking things...isn't really helping the case of the present. A Sikh mosque opening their doors to people for shelter, that's a worthy thing. People coming together in a time of need is worthy of discussion.

Let's not squander a moment to bring a divided state (*and country) together. This disaster is a chance to bring us together.

Consider taking a moment to inventory your home...and think "if the dam does break, I can give the following to the people in loss".


....and a whiff of patchouli oil floats by on the breeze, while in the backround, Hari Krishna's yodel, accompanied by drums and tambourines.

GTC

I can guarantee if the dam fails, whatever money was saved by building it almost good enough, and maintaining it almost good enough will be several orders of magnitude shy of the cost of the devastation.

Probably sufficient to bankrupt the already teetering California government mismanagement.
Originally Posted by rnovi
Just a question to ponder. At some point this discussion is all about money.

Could the dam have been built "better"? Sure. At what price?

It's easy to armchair quarterback this 40 years later.


How much has been spent on Jerrys bullet train??? Or his giant water tunnels??? There are priorities...then there are priorities...
Originally Posted by fester
...America in general needs a good overhaul...ENEMA


Fixed it.
Originally Posted by 458 Lott
I can guarantee if the dam fails, whatever money was saved by building it almost good enough, and maintaining it almost good enough will be several orders of magnitude shy of the cost of the devastation.

Probably sufficient to bankrupt the already teetering California government mismanagement.


The dam isn't gonna fail and neither is the spillway...bank on it. If Trump really wanted to drain the swamp he should direct the U.S. DOJ to seek copies of the hard drives of everybody connected to this debacle....from the DWR honchos to the Governor...I sure wish I owned the quarry they're getting their rock from....I wonder if the DOT is giving waivers for the guys running the rock trucks...
Originally Posted by 458 Lott
I can guarantee if the dam fails, whatever money was saved by building it almost good enough, and maintaining it almost good enough will be several orders of magnitude shy of the cost of the devastation.

Probably sufficient to bankrupt the already teetering California government mismanagement.


Aw, c'mon, if we hold hands and chant loud enough, more capital will just float in on gossamer wings, and once again all will be right in la-la land.
......I HATE that the folks out there are having to go through this.

...the "Make Lemonade" side of my nature sees this as a TEST CASE to use as this whole new approach gains ground.

GTC
Originally Posted by 458 Lott
Originally Posted by FreeMe
So - this info they're putting out about 30' to the bedrock meaning only a 30' wall of water would imply that the concrete emergency "spillway" - which is, in fact, at least on the south end, actually a section of dam itself (because of the natural slope in that direction)...is embedded directly upon bedrock. I guess. Or not....

Fester has reasons to be worried. Someone is downplaying this for sure.


The 30' wall of water would be if the dam was filled to top and the 30' cap of the emergency spillway failed.

What isn't being addressed is the failure of the main spillway, a failure that is well below the top of the dam and if that failure led to the dam failing at that level
...


Could you clarify that for me, I'm not quite following. Thanks
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by 458 Lott
I can guarantee if the dam fails, whatever money was saved by building it almost good enough, and maintaining it almost good enough will be several orders of magnitude shy of the cost of the devastation.

Probably sufficient to bankrupt the already teetering California government mismanagement.


The dam isn't gonna fail and neither is the spillway...bank on it. If Trump really wanted to drain the swamp he should direct the U.S. DOJ to seek copies of the hard drives of everybody connected to this debacle....from the DWR honchos to the Governor...I sure wish I owned the quarry they're getting their rock from....I wonder if the DOT is giving waivers for the guys running the rock trucks...




So the officials caused this crisis so they could sell rocks from the quarry and make money? Got it crazy
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
....it was the suggestion that somehow the river level below the dam was high enough to force water and debris back up into the turbines and back uphill into the lake....it's IMPOSSIBLE for that to happen...


MM-
I can tell you that the water of a high tide here in Cook Inlet will back up the Kenai River 12 MILES.

The amount of H2O coming over/through that damn dam absolutely WILL back up the river water above it's outlet.

Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by 458 Lott
Originally Posted by FreeMe
So - this info they're putting out about 30' to the bedrock meaning only a 30' wall of water would imply that the concrete emergency "spillway" - which is, in fact, at least on the south end, actually a section of dam itself (because of the natural slope in that direction)...is embedded directly upon bedrock. I guess. Or not....

Fester has reasons to be worried. Someone is downplaying this for sure.


The 30' wall of water would be if the dam was filled to top and the 30' cap of the emergency spillway failed.

What isn't being addressed is the failure of the main spillway, a failure that is well below the top of the dam and if that failure led to the dam failing at that level
...


Could you clarify that for me, I'm not quite following. Thanks


Imagine this hole

[Linked Image]

Being exposed to this

[Linked Image]

To the point that the hole works it's way back to the point that the dam at that point can't hold the water back behind it.
I gotcha
Surf's up.
Best picture I've seen of the emergency spillway

[Linked Image]

Looking at the picture lower right edge of the spillway, looks like they frightfully close to failure.
Originally Posted by ironbender


MM-
I can tell you that the water of a high tide here in Cook Inlet will back up the Kenai River 12 MILES.

The amount of H2O coming over/through that damn dam absolutely WILL back up the river water above it's outlet.



I understand that....high tide can raise or lower the Sacramento River a couple of feet in the summertime, and Sacramento's about 75 miles from the bay, but there's no way in hell the water coming out of the discharge at the bottom of a 900 ft. dam is gonna get pushed back up the tubes by the river below it...even if the river was a foot below the lake level... it's simple physics...it's impossible.
Quote
Best picture I've seen of the emergency spillway


It is so....THANKS !

The wide angle lenses those photography drones are packing don't make it easy to read the actual terrain though.

Any body have a current weather forecast for the area ?

GTC

Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
....it was the suggestion that somehow the river level below the dam was high enough to force water and debris back up into the turbines and back uphill into the lake....it's IMPOSSIBLE for that to happen...


MM-
I can tell you that the water of a high tide here in Cook Inlet will back up the Kenai River 12 MILES.

The amount of H2O coming over/through that damn dam absolutely WILL back up the river water above it's outlet.



We're wasting our breath trying to talk to this guy.

GTC
As long as he continues to ignore multiple engineers with experience and the simple physics of energy lost due to spinning those blades...
Current forecast is for three storms in a row.

Light rain

"Light rain

Heavy rain

The dame should be 60 feed down when #3 hits
Also

The spillway erosion is decreasing

Water is clear and the red-brown mud flow is grey green.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
As long as he continues to ignore multiple engineers with experience and the simple physics of energy lost due to spinning those blades...


I have to siphon off our fire fighting pond after good storms, with 2" PVC pipe...it empties into a small wash about a hundred feet downhill....even if the water was spinning blades at the bottom, there is no way the pressure inside that 2" PVC is going to let ANYTHING casually wash back up the pipe....




Imagine this hole

[Linked Image]

Being exposed to this

[Linked Image]

Anyone else wonder where the huge boulders in the second phot came from?

Dug up and shoved downhill by the torrent?
That huge boulder at the base of the spillway may very well be the bedrock sluffing off as was pointed out in Greg's earlier post regarding the geology of the bedrock?
Originally Posted by crossfireoops

We're wasting our breath trying to talk to this guy.

GTC


I agree you're wasting breath... http://www.water.ca.gov/swp/facilities/Oroville/hyatt.cfm

Originally Posted by viking
Will it take out southern Cali.


Sacramento?
Originally Posted by fester



Ooh. Burn.

You didn't clarify your comment, c ock gobbler.


I'm sorry, my crayon font is broken.

Maybe phone a friend?




Clark
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Just added a pic / drawing to a post above, sorry I didn't put it there first go round,....I THINK that what we're seeing in that hole immediately below that spill wall IS the actual core structure of the "impervious wall".
The minimalist philosophy that defines the engineering of "Earth Filled Dams" DICTATES that that core structure has to have massive weight (overburden) bearing on it from above,.....
....washing it all away is not a very bright idea, and one has to ask, WTF else did they EXPECT that overburden to do ?

GTC


Crossfire, neither spillway is on the earthfill dam.
Originally Posted by Steelhead




http://jaytaylormedia.com/who-will-be-blamed-if-the-oroville-dam-fails/





"In a lengthy analysis of the political battle to win approval for the dam, historian Marc Reisner recounted how Governor Pat Brown — father of the current governor — repeatedly fabricated numbers about the dam’s true cost in order to hoodwink the voters into approving the enormously expensive project through a bond issue in 1959.

Reisner showed that honest estimates concluded the dam would cost approximately 3 billion dollars — more than 20 billion in 2016 dollars — so Brown simply invented a number of 1.75 billion. Reisner concluded that Brown knew that “not one” state would vote for such a huge bond issue, so Brown hid the real cost. To get it passed, Brown did what politicians always do — he engaged in fear-mongering and suggested to Southern California voters that they’d run out of water without the new dam.

But even these methods nearly failed to get the dam approved. 48 of 50 counties in the state voted against the dam. The measure only passed because southern Californians, long used to cheap, subsidized water, were happy to see the rest of the state go into debt to pay for even more water."


Funny you would quote Marc Reisner. Not an historian, he was a lawyer, and an environmentalist, who wrote "Cadillac Desert", about how terrible dams and water development were.

Your google-fu is weak, if you don't understand what you are cutting and pasting.

Sycamore

Quote
Crossfire, neither spillway is on the earthfill dam.


Right, syc,....they both sit on solidly agglomerated seam and fault free GRANITE bedrock,the very bones of the fuggin' earth.
....no, wait,....la la land pixie dust poofing makes whatever that schidt is even STOUTER than that.

Thanks for getting us all up to speed.

GTC
Originally Posted by irfubar
Interesting that Pat Brown resided over the planning, financing and construction over the dam.

And his son Jerry Brown resided over the maintenance, and both appeared to have failed.


URfubar,

How many years of Republican governors in California since Pat Brown (finished in 1967)?

Just so we know who presided over the maintenance?

Sycamore
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by 458 Lott
Originally Posted by FreeMe
So - this info they're putting out about 30' to the bedrock meaning only a 30' wall of water would imply that the concrete emergency "spillway" - which is, in fact, at least on the south end, actually a section of dam itself (because of the natural slope in that direction)...is embedded directly upon bedrock. I guess. Or not....

Fester has reasons to be worried. Someone is downplaying this for sure.


The 30' wall of water would be if the dam was filled to top and the 30' cap of the emergency spillway failed.

What isn't being addressed is the failure of the main spillway, a failure that is well below the top of the dam and if that failure led to the dam failing at that level...


Yup, a 10X and right on the money

again, think cavitation

That headwall and grout curtain are ONLY valid with OVERBURDEN holing em' down.


the main spillway is excavated into rock at the top.

Sycamore
Quote

the main spillway is excavated into rock at the top.

Sycamore


well, I'd say only a greenhorn would call that schidt "rock", or "bedrock.

Quote
Metamorphic rocks often cause engineering problems, as such rocks are often folded, resulting in tectonized/fractured areas in an otherwise stable rock mass. Also, the particular structure (the geological correct term is texture) of such rocks poses a problem. Metamorphic foliation forms when elongated or plate-shaped minerals (like micas) are forced by tectonic pressure into a same alignment. Between the minerals the parallel surfaces of the foliation form weak zones, prone to break. If such surfaces are tilted entire packets of rock can easily slip and be washed away by water.


No matter, once they laid a reinforced concrete pad out ver backfill in front (lakeside), that mighty ridge (or pile of schidt) BECAME a component of an earth filled dam. The fact that the other side wasn't ever completed to anything resembling a spec. now becomes apparent.

.....fuggin' Reagan, anyway. crazy

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
Crossfire, neither spillway is on the earthfill dam.


Right, syc,....they both sit on solidly agglomerated seam and fault free GRANITE bedrock,the very bones of the fuggin' earth.
....no, wait,....la la land pixie dust poofing makes whatever that schidt is even STOUTER than that.

Thanks for getting us all up to speed.

GTC


That's the trick with dam building, they're cheaper if you build them where the river is, rather than wandering around looking for optimum bedrock.

Hydro_Quebec and those Ontario boys have it made, the Canadian shield and plenty water, everybody else has to work with what they got.

p/s I doubt if you will be up to speed on this topic, but I appreciate your occasional willingness to learn.

Sycamore

Quote
I doubt if you will be up to speed on this topic, but I appreciate your occasional willingness to learn.


Right syc,....so don't waste time on me here, there are a herd of nasty conservatives for you to go chase, so go sic em'

GTC
Perhaps, but you will always be a c*nt.
you sure are a grumpy little guy! grin

you used to be so nice, when you were moving across country, you'd butter everybody up, so they'd let you stay with the. Of course, you felt free to talk schidt about them after the hospitality was over. blush

Sycamore
Originally Posted by BMT
Current forecast is for three storms in a row.

Light rain

"Light rain

Heavy rain

The dame should be 60 feed down when #3 hits


Thanks, Señor

GTC
CA governors

Reagan 68-74 R

Brown 74-82 D

Dukemejian 82-90 R

Wilson Rino

Gray Davis D

Arnold Rino

Brown again D
WOW! It's been a long day on this dam thread!
Originally Posted by BMT

Imagine this hole

[Linked Image]

Being exposed to this

[Linked Image]

Anyone else wonder where the huge boulders in the second phot came from?

Dug up and shoved downhill by the torrent?


The different angles make it hard to really see what's going on, but the ground on that side of the spillway was previously much higher. Quite possible that those boulders were covered by dirt where they sit, until water washed it away. Scan through collections of historical photos next to recent ones and you'll see what I mean.
Send some here
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Yup, and people do not realize how lucky folks were the Teton Dam collapsed while being filled instead of 130' below the top. The next 100' was a Hell of a lot more water than the first.

There was also similar "bedrock" there that was the problem. And it was volcanic tuff as I recall with better properties than foliated basalt.


That's an interesting statement, since basalt can't be foliated - it's igneous. But never mind that - the bedrock at Teton wasn't tuff anyway, it was rhyolite, as is much of the bedrock in Idaho.

The fact is that the bedrock at Teton had fissures (typical of rhyolite) that weren't grouted sufficiently (if that is even possible), and the dam failed from low on one side. So the bedrock under Teton dam was not better than, or even similar to, what is under Oroville. And the dynamics of that dam failure were not in any way comparable to what is happening at Oroville (at this time).

The sky is falling the sky is falling damnagidon is upon us!!
Quote
That's an interesting statement, since basalt can't be foliated - it's igneous.


Per my posted yesterday:
Quote

According to available geological maps, the Oroville Dam is build on the Smartville ophiolite, consisting of dark grey, steeply-dipping and strongly foliated metamorphic rocks. Once of volcanic origin, erupted in an ancient sea, the rocks were uplifted and metamorphosed during the formation of the Sierra Nevada.

OK,...let's hear it.
WTF, Over ?
More on Foliated Basalt
An Excerpt :

Quote
Like other ophiolites, the Smartville ophiolite contains large amounts of serpentine and other ultramafic rocks, along with gabbro, basalt, and other mafic rocks. Basalt in the Smartville ophiolite sometimes takes the form of pillow lava, a billowing shape caused when lava erupts under the ocean and is rapidly cooled by the ocean water.


Link: https://localwiki.org/yuba-sutter/Smartville_ophiolite

Smartville ophiolite

The Smartville ophiolite is an ophiolite (a large expanse of rocks from the ocean floor exposed on the surace of dry land) that passes through much of the northern California foothills, reaching from northwestern Lake Oroville southeast to Cameron Park. Its western edge passes slightly east of Palermo and Loomis, and its eastern edge passes slightly east of Nevada City. In Yuba County, it passes through Browns Valley, Brownsville, Challenge, Dobbins, Frenchtown, Greenville, Loma Rica, Oregon House, Rackerby, the Spenceville State Wildlife Area, and of course the town of Smartsville, for which it is named.

The theory of plate tectonics holds that the North American continental plate has been moving gradually west ever since North America broke away from the supercontinent Pangaea during the time of the dinosaurs. While moving west, the North American continental plate collided with several large prehistoric islands, which then became attached to the continent. Most of the land in California comes from these large prehistoric islands. In fact, the Mojave desert region is the only part of California that was originally part of the North American continental plate.

In a few areas, part of the ocean floor that had previously separated those prehistoric islands from the continent was pushed up and became part of the continental surface. These areas of former ocean floor are called ophiolites. The Smartville ophiolite is one of several major ophiolites in California.

Ophiolites are found in all the major mountain ranges of the world. The need to explain how fossils of prehistoric sea creatures ended up on high mountaintops played a major role in the development of the theory of plate tectonics. Additionally, much of what scientists know about the ocean floor comes from studying ophiolites, because ophiolites are so much more accessible than the land that's still under the ocean.

Like other ophiolites, the Smartville ophiolite contains large amounts of serpentine and other ultramafic rocks, along with gabbro, basalt, and other mafic rocks. Basalt in the Smartville ophiolite sometimes takes the form of pillow lava, a billowing shape caused when lava erupts under the ocean and is rapidly cooled by the ocean water.

For information about the unusual effects that serpentine and other ultramafic rocks have on plant growth, see the Serpentine page. Gabbro and other mafic rocks can have similar but milder effects on plant growth.
Has it been 60 minutes yet?
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Quote
That's an interesting statement, since basalt can't be foliated - it's igneous.


Per my posted yesterday:
Quote

According to available geological maps, the Oroville Dam is build on the Smartville ophiolite, consisting of dark grey, steeply-dipping and strongly foliated metamorphic rocks. Once of volcanic origin, erupted in an ancient sea, the rocks were uplifted and metamorphosed during the formation of the Sierra Nevada.

OK,...let's hear it.
WTF, Over ?


Yep - foliated metamorphic rock. Basalt is igneous - not metamorphic. If basalt goes through the metamorphic process, it becomes...something other than basalt. Hence, my "interesting statement" statement. But didn't I follow that up with "never mind that"?
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
More on Foliated Basalt
An Excerpt :

Quote
Like other ophiolites, the Smartville ophiolite contains large amounts of serpentine and other ultramafic rocks, along with gabbro, basalt, and other mafic rocks. Basalt in the Smartville ophiolite sometimes takes the form of pillow lava, a billowing shape caused when lava erupts under the ocean and is rapidly cooled by the ocean water.


Link: https://localwiki.org/yuba-sutter/Smartville_ophiolite

Smartville ophiolite

The Smartville ophiolite is an ophiolite (a large expanse of rocks from the ocean floor exposed on the surace of dry land) that passes through much of the northern California foothills, reaching from northwestern Lake Oroville southeast to Cameron Park. Its western edge passes slightly east of Palermo and Loomis, and its eastern edge passes slightly east of Nevada City. In Yuba County, it passes through Browns Valley, Brownsville, Challenge, Dobbins, Frenchtown, Greenville, Loma Rica, Oregon House, Rackerby, the Spenceville State Wildlife Area, and of course the town of Smartsville, for which it is named.

The theory of plate tectonics holds that the North American continental plate has been moving gradually west ever since North America broke away from the supercontinent Pangaea during the time of the dinosaurs. While moving west, the North American continental plate collided with several large prehistoric islands, which then became attached to the continent. Most of the land in California comes from these large prehistoric islands. In fact, the Mojave desert region is the only part of California that was originally part of the North American continental plate.

In a few areas, part of the ocean floor that had previously separated those prehistoric islands from the continent was pushed up and became part of the continental surface. These areas of former ocean floor are called ophiolites. The Smartville ophiolite is one of several major ophiolites in California.

Ophiolites are found in all the major mountain ranges of the world. The need to explain how fossils of prehistoric sea creatures ended up on high mountaintops played a major role in the development of the theory of plate tectonics. Additionally, much of what scientists know about the ocean floor comes from studying ophiolites, because ophiolites are so much more accessible than the land that's still under the ocean.

Like other ophiolites, the Smartville ophiolite contains large amounts of serpentine and other ultramafic rocks, along with gabbro, basalt, and other mafic rocks. Basalt in the Smartville ophiolite sometimes takes the form of pillow lava, a billowing shape caused when lava erupts under the ocean and is rapidly cooled by the ocean water.

For information about the unusual effects that serpentine and other ultramafic rocks have on plant growth, see the Serpentine page. Gabbro and other mafic rocks can have similar but milder effects on plant growth.


I haven't had my coffee yet and I'm feeling a little dense - but I read that whole link (a wiki? come on...) and saw no mention of foliated anything.
Quote
I haven't had my coffee yet and I'm feeling a little dense - but I read that whole link (a wiki? come on...) and saw no mention of foliated anything.


No, I'm not going to "come on",....the two treatises I put up are of excellent quality and veracity, and I GAFRA whether you like my using wiki or not. There are VOLUMES of excellent material about the area discussed
Got things to do, and have little or no time for debating with somebody to lazy to do a little research about regional surface geologies before pontifificating like a over inflated gas bag.

GTC
So, it doesn't matter that "foliated" isn't even part of that?

I get it. It doesn't matter whether we get the details right or not, as long as we blow hard enough.

This dam may be in danger of causing a flood (I believe it is), but it isn't going to be the catastrophic total failure that Teton was - not because of this spillway trouble. The irony of all the angst here is that before the dam was built, seasonal floods were common. One could argue that those floods were better for the environment....but I'm thinking you aren't going down that road.

The reason all this matters, re comparisons to Teton, is that the two are completely different events. Teton's leak started low on the dam - the earth fill part - at its junction with the bedrock canyon wall. The erosion was entirely in the fill material. Teton's spillway was situated in a very similar manner to Oroville's, on a projecting ridge next to the dam proper. The flow of the breach, when it blew out, was actually scouring the edge of that bedrock as the dam was collapsing, but the bedrock didn't crumble away. Even though it wasn't the best of structural materials (as subsequently admitted). The force of that catastrophic flow didn't seem to have much effect on it.

At Oroville, the erosion is starting outside of the fill area and has some concrete and bedrock to get through before the dam. Not impossible at all, but even at that, it will be a top-down erosion - not blowing out the middle, as in Teton.

I'm afraid the massive annihilation of Californians dreams of some on this thread just isn't gonna happen.
I like how they discuss the problem, while repeating the dam is in no danger, while if the achilles heel fails, the dam will be left standing holding back a wall of air.
Since I wasn't there when they drilled core samples or poured the spillways, I have no idea what the composition of the bedrock below might or might not be, nor the depth of said "bedrock"...but, by all means, keep the comments flowing...speculation is never not entertaining...yeah, I know...I read it on the innernet...blah, blah, blah....

Originally Posted by sse
I like how they discuss the problem, while repeating the dam is in no danger, while if the achilles heel fails, the dam will be left standing holding back a wall of air.


Wrong...if the spillways had experienced total failure, most of the water behind the dam would still be there...
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by sse
I like how they discuss the problem, while repeating the dam is in no danger, while if the achilles heel fails, the dam will be left standing holding back a wall of air.


Wrong...if the spillways had experienced total failure, most of the water behind the dam would still be there...

How do you know that?
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Yup, and people do not realize how lucky folks were the Teton Dam collapsed while being filled instead of 130' below the top. The next 100' was a Hell of a lot more water than the first.

There was also similar "bedrock" there that was the problem. And it was volcanic tuff as I recall with better properties than foliated basalt.


That's an interesting statement, since basalt can't be foliated - it's igneous. But never mind that - the bedrock at Teton wasn't tuff anyway, it was rhyolite, as is much of the bedrock in Idaho.

The fact is that the bedrock at Teton had fissures (typical of rhyolite) that weren't grouted sufficiently (if that is even possible), and the dam failed from low on one side. So the bedrock under Teton dam was not better than, or even similar to, what is under Oroville. And the dynamics of that dam failure were not in any way comparable to what is happening at Oroville (at this time).



Not long after the collapse of the dam I was taking an advanced geology course not too far from the site. The class took a roadtrip to look at what happened. That was a long time ago and my memory could have slipped a bit.

So I looked it up:
http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/faculty/sylvester/Teton_Dam/narrative.html

The volcanic rock at the dam site consists of hard, welded, rhyolitic ash-flow tuff dated at 1.9 million years. Along the axis of the dam, the tuff ranges in thickness from about 50 feet in the left side of the channel section to more than 500 feet under the right abutment. The tuff is underlain by sedimentary rocks which are not exposed along the dam axis but were encountered in exploratory drill holes. On the left side of the canyon bottom, an erosional remnant of an intracanyon basalt flow overlies the tuff. On the right side of the canyon, the basalt and tuff are overlain by a thick accumulation of young alluvium. A thin layer of older alluvium is also intercalated between the tuff and the basalt.

The tuff in the right abutment is foliated and strongly jointed. The joints consist of both high-angle and low angle joints. The dominant high-angle joints are spaced from a few feet to about 10 feet apart, whereas the low-angle joints are generally widely spaced except in the upper 70 to 100 feet of the abutment. There the closer spacing results in a platy structure. After the dam failure, some of the joints were observed to be tight, others open as much as 5 inches. Some joints are lined with calcite, others are filled with silt and rubble.

----------------------------------------------

So there is rhyolite in it, but it is welded tuff.

I did confuse the foliated "bedrock" at the Oroville dam for basalt... as this is the initial filling of the dam all the way to overflowing it is putting a new test on lousy underpinnings.
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by sse
I like how they discuss the problem, while repeating the dam is in no danger, while if the achilles heel fails, the dam will be left standing holding back a wall of air.


Wrong...if the spillways had experienced total failure, most of the water behind the dam would still be there...

Even if 'most' was left behind the dam, the predicted top 30' would be a huge disaster.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
The reason all this matters, re comparisons to Teton, is that the two are completely different events. Teton's leak started low on the dam - the earth fill part - at its junction with the bedrock canyon wall. The erosion was entirely in the fill material. Teton's spillway was situated in a very similar manner to Oroville's, on a projecting ridge next to the dam proper. The flow of the breach, when it blew out, was actually scouring the edge of that bedrock as the dam was collapsing, but the bedrock didn't crumble away. Even though it wasn't the best of structural materials (as subsequently admitted). The force of that catastrophic flow didn't seem to have much effect on it.

At Oroville, the erosion is starting outside of the fill area and has some concrete and bedrock to get through before the dam. Not impossible at all, but even at that, it will be a top-down erosion - not blowing out the middle, as in Teton.

I'm afraid the massive annihilation of Californians dreams of some on this thread just isn't gonna happen.


The reason it did not have much effect on it was the much softer dam materials gave way very fast leading the flow away from the bedrock.
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by sse
I like how they discuss the problem, while repeating the dam is in no danger, while if the achilles heel fails, the dam will be left standing holding back a wall of air.


Wrong...if the spillways had experienced total failure, most of the water behind the dam would still be there...

Even if 'most' was left behind the dam, the predicted top 30' would be a huge disaster.


And once they lose basic integrity the whole thing would likely wash out.
Have not been following this closely, but whoever drafted the "60-minute imminent failure" header should be punished.
The lake behind the dam is immense. I hope the rainy weather expected for the next week is not too bad, but reports from the coast are measuring the rainfall in inches.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by sse
I like how they discuss the problem, while repeating the dam is in no danger, while if the achilles heel fails, the dam will be left standing holding back a wall of air.


Wrong...if the spillways had experienced total failure, most of the water behind the dam would still be there...

Even if 'most' was left behind the dam, the predicted top 30' would be a huge disaster.


And once they lose basic integrity the whole thing would likely wash out.

Of course. It would make the main spillway hole look like a divot. But, I was just responding to the singular statement as if most of the water left means no consequence of 'loosing' the top.
Oroville, CA weather:

https://www.wunderground.com/q/zmw:95965.1.99999

Active Advisory: Flood Warning, Flash Flood Watch, Hydrologic Statement Active Notice: Flash Flood Watch
5" in the next 6 days, only predictions, but...
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by sse
I like how they discuss the problem, while repeating the dam is in no danger, while if the achilles heel fails, the dam will be left standing holding back a wall of air.


Wrong...if the spillways had experienced total failure, most of the water behind the dam would still be there...

Even if 'most' was left behind the dam, the predicted top 30' would be a huge disaster.


And once they lose basic integrity the whole thing would likely wash out.


No it wouldn't...I agree that a 30 ft. "wall of water" would be a huge disaster, but none of the structure was ever in danger of failure...sure, it makes for great headlines, finger pointing and idiotic posts, but like you'll see down the road, it's going to come out that the DWR was well aware of what would happen if the water started going over the emergency spillway...hint...it was no secret... and they were also well aware what the inflow was and how fast they could lower the lake through the main spillway if needed...the thing to remember is they (DWR) were presented with the unique and fairly uncommon circumstances of having a full lake, an excess of inflow, and the "PLAUSIBLE" excuse of the damaged portion of the lower apron of the main spillway to potentially justify their decision to slow the flow on the main spillway and "ALLOW" it to flow over the emergency section, knowing full well what would happen...
If the purpose of the spillways was to release water without significance damage they have already failed. With rain and Spring run off we will see how dire may be the consequences.
Originally Posted by 1minute
Have not been following this closely, but whoever drafted the "60-minute imminent failure" header should be punished.


From the link in the op's post. It was the state that said it would fail in the next 60 minutes.

The California Department of Water Resources issued a sudden evacuation order shortly before 5 p.m. Sunday for residents near the Oroville Dam in northern California, warning that the dam’s emergency spillway would fail in the next 60 minutes.

The Oroville Dam is the highest in the nation.

An emergency alert issued on Facebook stated:

EMERGENCY EVACUATION ORDER ISSUED: Officials are anticipating a failure of the Auxiliary Spillway at Oroville Dam within the next 60 minutes. Residents of Oroville should evacuate in a northward direction, toward Chico. Other cities should follow the orders of their local law enforcement
Not sure if this has been posted or not, but here's a pretty good forum on the dam that contains some interesting information (in this layman's opinion).

https://www.metabunk.org/oroville-dam-spillway-failure.t8381/page-19
typical ignorant emergency manager debacle they run from $hit and a sweat every time a ant farts . is there any one with any common sense anymore ??????????
IS THE 60 MIN UP YET !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CoElk101: Well as much as I despise kalifornicationkopia I hope no one gets killt if this thing ever does fail.
I wonder if the R.C.B.S. Company (manufacturing plant) is upstream or downstream (in danger) from this dam?
Anyway hope no one is hurt if worse comes to worse.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
Meanwhile, real people have real problems.
R.C.B.S Company is downstream.
Originally Posted by VarmintGuy
CoElk101: Well as much as I despise kalifornicationkopia I hope no one gets killt if this thing ever does fail.
I wonder if the R.C.B.S. Company (manufacturing plant) is upstream or downstream (in danger) from this dam?
Anyway hope no one is hurt if worse comes to worse.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy


Yep, there's more than a few Despicables here. Is that the reason you "despise kalifornicationkopia".

You ARE a f ucking MORON.

Now go outside and piss in the wind, JERKWAD.
There ain't enough money in 'nair' Texas bank to make me live downhill from that sumbeech!!
[Linked Image]
From the NWS for Oroville. Doesn't look super bad.
link


This Afternoon
A 50 percent chance of showers. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 60. South southeast wind around 9 mph.

Tonight
A 50 percent chance of showers. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 50. East northeast wind 5 to 7 mph. New precipitation amounts of less than a tenth of an inch possible.

Friday
Showers. High near 56. East southeast wind 6 to 9 mph. Chance of precipitation is 90%. New precipitation amounts between a half and three quarters of an inch possible.

Friday Night
Showers. Low around 49. East southeast wind around 6 mph becoming calm in the evening. Chance of precipitation is 90%. New precipitation amounts between a quarter and half of an inch possible.

Saturday
Showers likely, mainly before 10am. Cloudy, with a high near 59. Calm wind becoming south around 5 mph in the morning. Chance of precipitation is 60%.

Saturday Night
A 30 percent chance of showers. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 46.

Sunday
A 50 percent chance of showers. Cloudy, with a high near 56.

Sunday Night
Showers. Cloudy, with a low around 54.

Washington's Birthday
Rain. The rain could be heavy at times. Cloudy, with a high near 59.

Monday Night
Rain. Cloudy, with a low around 51. Breezy.

Tuesday
Rain likely. Cloudy, with a high near 60.

Tuesday Night
A chance of showers. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 48.

Wednesday
A chance of showers. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 57.

Wednesday Night
A chance of showers. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 44.

Thursday
Mostly sunny, with a high near 57.
Originally Posted by fish head
I haven't heard anything, from the inside skinny, about the turbines being affected but if it happened I should find out in the next few days.



The power plant is shut down due to debris. That's the extent of what I was told. I don't know if the debris was ingested or it came in the form of a suppository.

Y'all can discuss it. smile
Originally Posted by fish head
Originally Posted by fish head
I haven't heard anything, from the inside skinny, about the turbines being affected but if it happened I should find out in the next few days.



The power plant is shut down due to debris. That's the extent of what I was told. I don't know if the debris was ingested or it came in the form of a suppository.

Y'all can discuss it. smile



Middlefork miner told us that isn't possible. I brought up the power plant being shut earlier and we already argued over it. crazy
Originally Posted by Steve
Not sure if this has been posted or not, but here's a pretty good forum on the dam that contains some interesting information (in this layman's opinion).

https://www.metabunk.org/oroville-dam-spillway-failure.t8381/page-19


Much more informed discussion going on there. Thanks.
Originally Posted by irfubar
Originally Posted by fish head
Originally Posted by fish head
I haven't heard anything, from the inside skinny, about the turbines being affected but if it happened I should find out in the next few days.



The power plant is shut down due to debris. That's the extent of what I was told. I don't know if the debris was ingested or it came in the form of a suppository.

Y'all can discuss it. smile



Middlefork miner told us that isn't possible. I brought up the power plant being shut earlier and we already argued over it. crazy


There's a big difference in debris backing up water than actually entering the discharge chutes...

http://www.capradio.org/articles/20...pillway-as-new-storms-hit-northern-calif
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by Steve
Not sure if this has been posted or not, but here's a pretty good forum on the dam that contains some interesting information (in this layman's opinion).

https://www.metabunk.org/oroville-dam-spillway-failure.t8381/page-19


Much more informed discussion going on there. Thanks.

from that blog :
Quote

Yes the emergency spillway works as an overflow, but it's also supposed to not fail at the first trickle of water.


You're right, nobody HERE has made that patently FACTUAL observation, have they.

GTC


From same blog
http://www.petersoncat.com/history/oroville-dam said:

Quote
Buster’s Quad D9s were the star of the show on the $20 million spillway. Excavation of some 4 million cubic yards of solid rock made it one of the biggest ripping jobs in the West at the time. One million yards of that material had to be ripped using various methods, including Peterson’s new Quad D9 arrangement, outfitted with two 10-ft shanks, each with 4-ft extensions.


Nope, no WAY that formation could be called FOLIATED, what a dumb proposal on my (and the USGS's) part.

Ripping "Igneous basalt" is a real common practice, it's easy...no ?

GTC
Deleted because I was acting the dick in this post.
Hey Steve, look at who you just posted to, Steve,...and then go look at who I posted to with comments that apparently now have you all "butthurt".

....wasn't even talking to you.

I do thank you for putting that site up,....there is some GREAT material there.

I posted off it with some justifiable emphasis because there are a LOT of guys over there saying exactly what we've been posting over here.

No butthurt here as to you, Bud, ....though you can rest assured I give a FRA what font size appeals to your easily hurt feelers.

I hope RCBS doesn't get washed away
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Hey Steve, look at who you just posted to, Steve,...and then go look at who I posted to with comments that apparently now have you all "butthurt".

....wasn't even talking to you.

I do thank you for putting that site up,....there is some GREAT material there.

I posted off it with some justifiable emphasis because there are a LOT of guys over there saying exactly what we've been posting over here.

No butthurt here as to you, Bud, ....though you can rest assured I give a FRA what font size appeals to your easily hurt feelers.



Fair enough. I was out of line and I apologize. I would blame my response this cold I'm fighting, but more honestly I was just being a dick.

Is the 60 minute warning period over?
Why is this thread still here no one gave a [bleep] back 20 pages ago!????????????
Originally Posted by djs
Is the 60 minute warning period over?

Well, if you could tell time....
Interesting article

https://www.google.com/amp/www.merc...the-spillway-collapse/amp/?client=safari
Originally Posted by mohick
Why is this thread still here no one gave a [bleep] back 20 pages ago!????????????


No One

ya' know, that's a damned good campfire name for you, ya' pathetic snappy little mutt.
Two things.
1) The word foliated is not used often enough; this thread has been a godsend.
2) Let's see what happens after Sunday's rain. What's the lake level?
Crossfireoops would argue who left the skid marks in his own underwear with scientific/geological data he found on the internet.

Fact.
Eat right, and you'll schidt right.
you sound very knowledgable about skid marks, maybe you should start a thread about em', Stud.

GTC
Originally Posted by mohick
Why is this thread still here no one gave a [bleep] back 20 pages ago!????????????



It's not so much like anybody really still gives a schitt, but you have to admit, it's not every day that you see a state water agency say an upstream dam is gonna fail within 60 minutes and evacuate over 180,000 people...

Then Nothing Happens...
Have the evacs started down in the mudslide zone yet, today ?
About the turbines. Just shut down or actually damaged?


Can't have too many links. CA and NV river stages.

http://www.cnrfc.noaa.gov/
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Have the evacs started down in the mudslide zone yet, today ?


I just returned from an area where I released a mudslide...no evacs needed, as it was a controlled and contained release. No debris entered the discharge chute...
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
About the turbines. Just shut down or actually damaged?



http://www.capradio.org/articles/20...pillway-as-new-storms-hit-northern-calif
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
About the turbines. Just shut down or actually damaged?



http://www.capradio.org/articles/20...pillway-as-new-storms-hit-northern-calif


Could you please paraphrase that and post here. Thanks.
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Have the evacs started down in the mudslide zone yet, today ?


I just returned from an area where I released a mudslide...no evacs needed, as it was a controlled and contained release. No debris entered the discharge chute...


Now THAT'S funny! Well played.
The debris from the erosion and the high water level at the diversion channel made the operation of the power plant dangerous

Flows down the spillway reduced to allow workers to clear debris so power can be brought online

Flows to continue down the spillway at 80,000 cfs for foreseeable future

Power plant operations will also reduce the lake level
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Have the evacs started down in the mudslide zone yet, today ?


I'll tell you this, there is going to be a lot of trees down today, it started blowing here about 4:00AM, barometer tanked, and we have 75MPH winds from 4:00Am to now...my backyard fence is gone...there goes the tax return, boat downriggers will have to wait until spring.
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Have the evacs started down in the mudslide zone yet, today ?


I just returned from an area where I released a mudslide...no evacs needed, as it was a controlled and contained release. No debris entered the discharge chute...


Now THAT'S funny! Well played.


Actually, some blue water did try to cavitate back up the chute, but the emergency shutoff valve worked its magic...
Originally Posted by Higbean
Crossfireoops would argue who left the skid marks in his own underwear with scientific/geological data he found on the internet.

Fact.

NO Shiit!
It gets tiresome.. laugh
This thread has gone downhill
Quote
NO Shiit!
It gets tiresome.....for those of us that just want to hoot, gibber, and fling schidt through the bars of our cages


Fixed,...what he really meant to say
Originally Posted by BMT
This thread has gone downhill


sliding off into a corner, for sure.

GTC
Originally Posted by Higbean
Crossfireoops would argue who left the skid marks in his own underwear with scientific/geological data he found on the internet.

Fact.


Would that be the same as arguing over the condition known as schistosity?(sp)

wink
Well, when you're right, errr, pretty dang close to right, you gotta make a case for it. LOL

TTT

MAGA
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Have the evacs started down in the mudslide zone yet, today ?


I just returned from an area where I released a mudslide...no evacs needed, as it was a controlled and contained release. No debris entered the discharge chute...


Did your core samples show Jalapeño seeds ?

GTC
Nope...those get screened out before they enter the intake...
Originally Posted by BMT
This thread has gone downhill


And it keeps getting washed back to the top...
Was a good interesting thread until,,,,,
This place would fqkup a wet dream
Originally Posted by 700LH
Was a good interesting thread until,,,,,
This place would fqkup a wet dream


You are dead wrong and have no idea what you re talking about. wink
Originally Posted by Scott F
Originally Posted by 700LH
Was a good interesting thread until,,,,,
This place would fqkup a wet dream


You are dead wrong and have no idea what you re talking about. wink


Actually, he's not "talking"....and if he were, so what???
The area is getting some decent rain today, tho it seems the storm hasn't been as bad as predicted so far in regards to rainfall. Breezy as I can ever recall this morning in my neck of the woods tho
See this earlier? Sucks. Bummer Barkoff...
Originally Posted by Barkoff
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Have the evacs started down in the mudslide zone yet, today ?


I'll tell you this, there is going to be a lot of trees down today, it started blowing here about 4:00AM, barometer tanked, and we have 75MPH winds from 4:00Am to now...my backyard fence is gone...there goes the tax return, boat downriggers will have to wait until spring.
Hey, alla y'all............


FOLIATE THIS!!
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
See this earlier? Sucks. Bummer Barkoff...
Originally Posted by Barkoff
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Have the evacs started down in the mudslide zone yet, today ?


I'll tell you this, there is going to be a lot of trees down today, it started blowing here about 4:00AM, barometer tanked, and we have 75MPH winds from 4:00Am to now...my backyard fence is gone...there goes the tax return, boat downriggers will have to wait until spring.


The best is yet to come...the levees in the valley are saturated, lake Don Pedro is supposed to spill over...heavy rain and winds are expected monday...the good news is that we should get snow above 4,000 ft. The bad news is that if we get a tropical storm in March like we did in 86, it's gonna get ugly quick...
In Feb '96 the warm rains did the deal in the Cascades.

ironbender ---> That is so immature - that I thought of it earlier! (-:
smile

Sick minds.
Originally Posted by ironbender
smile

Sick minds.


That's why I like it here.

Birds of a feather ...

smile
Originally Posted by Certifiable
The area is getting some decent rain today, tho it seems the storm hasn't been as bad as predicted so far in regards to rainfall. Breezy as I can ever recall this morning in my neck of the woods tho


Where is your neck of the woods? I'm down in Hollister.
Originally Posted by Barkoff
Originally Posted by Certifiable
The area is getting some decent rain today, tho it seems the storm hasn't been as bad as predicted so far in regards to rainfall. Breezy as I can ever recall this morning in my neck of the woods tho


Where is your neck of the woods? I'm down in Hollister.

Fremont
Is it going to hold or not
Originally Posted by hanco
Is it going to hold or not

Yes.
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by hanco
Is it going to hold or not

Yes.


Agreed. I can provide a link if desired.
Heard Victor Davis Hansen on the radio the other day. He explained how they've squandered the opportunity and the money to fix this thing (and some other stuff) over the years.

Reminds me of the old joke about the guy who complained about his roof leaking. Couldn't fix it because it was raining, he said. When asked why he didn't fix it when it wasn't raining, he said it didn't leak then.
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by hanco
Is it going to hold or not

Yes.


Maybe, maybe not...it was never in any danger of failure from the series of events that transpired last week...But winter isn't over yet...the rainy season won't end for a while and there's still a decent snow pack in the Sierras. If we were to get a weeks worth of heavy tropical monsoon type rain like we did in 86, it would be hard to wrap my mind around what would happen.

Some good reads are on line relating to this subject...I think I may have posted this earlier in the thread...
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf
It's a bit dated....for anybody interested, google "weather as a weapon of war"....there's tons of research going on...
Here's some dam pictures.

http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/02/...-show-damage-to-dams-emergency-spillway/
Time to go gold panning with all that heavy erosion! laugh
Originally Posted by luv2safari
Time to go gold panning with all that heavy erosion! laugh


I'd pass...
Right after it calms down.......
Somewhat related - the last time we drove I5 over Shasta Lake it was looking low - very low. Am thinking that the Feather flows to the Sacramento and not to Lake Shasta - so how has the recent precip affected Shasta? Will it get back to high normal?
Originally Posted by CCCC
Somewhat related - the last time we drove I5 over Shasta Lake it was looking low - very low. Am thinking that the Feather flows to the Sacramento and not to Lake Shasta - so how has the recent precip affected Shasta? Will it get back to high normal?


http://www.sacbee.com/news/state/california/water-and-drought/article133224899.html
CCCC,

Shasta also got dangerously high a few days ago, within a few feet of the top, but not as bad as Oroville. They had to greatly increase the outflow from the dam for the past week, which has caused all the local flooding in the Redding area.

They had to get it down before the next storms hit, the worst of which is supposed to hit tomorrow.

Just like Oroville, Shasta has now been brought down to 15.6' below the top, down from 7 or 8' a few days ago. They have gotten Oroville down over 40 feet by now. Their target was 50 feet, because the top 30' at the emergency spillway is weakened.

For flood control reserves, at this date annually they want Shasta to be about 30 feet below the top.

The Sacramento river and a few smaller rivers flow into Lake Shasta. The Sacramento river flows through Sacramento on its way to San Francisco Bay. The Feather River joins the Sacramento River just north of the city of Sacramento.

From Redding to Sacramento is about 160 miles, and then another 60 miles or so to the north end of San Francisco Bay.
If it continues to rain...and especially if we get a "pineapple express" in the near future, I won't be surprised if they start evacuating the more rural farmlands and intentionally breaching levees.
Forecast has about 4" by tuesday.

https://www.wunderground.com/q/zmw:95965.1.99999
A section on I-5
http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article133675254.html
It will not be long before Our great goobermint starts drain all of our Reservoirs to save them from speculated rain and then it will not rain and they will be empty for this summer when we need the water.

They have done it in the past and we have suffered due to their miss management.
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner


Looks like th Valentine's Day flood of 1986

I have fond memories of that flood
I've seen a few in my time, most recent biggie was the Reno flood, New Year's Day 1997. It was a rain-on-snow event, too. I remember the Truckee River went from 750 cfs to 19,000 cfs in about 2 days.
Four days ago, "Steve , Hilsboro Orygun" posted a link to metabunk :
Link: https://www.metabunk.org/oroville-dam-spillway-failure.t8381/page-19
for which I thank him again. It was sitting at 31 pages this AM, and I've read most of em', over the last 3, here's a NEW compendium posted there, some really GREAT backround material, maps, drawings, vid clips, and met reports.
Link: https://www.metabunk.org/oroville-dam-spillway-thread-quick-links.t8416/
The scale of all the emergency work completed, since Steve put this up is literally staggering, and deserves a hearty well done.
I really hope that the rains and Spring thaw turn out to be "just right" and that no further excitement and stress befalls the folks below the Oroville Dam.

GTC
This is a NEAT vid clip,.....those of us who grew up around heavy equipment will get a trip down memory lane,...Cats wore sprightly yellow umbrellas, no ROPS or AC. Again, the sheer SCALE of this project is a wonder...... All in all, quite a show.

Then Governor, Ronald Reagan's evocative words at the dedication / opening are worth a listen, too. "...a major achievement of our time."
Indeed.

As projects go,...Noteworthy, as well
Link: http://www.petersoncat.com/history/oroville-dam
excerpt :
Quote
Today, Oroville still stands as the tallest earth-fill dam in the United States and among the top 20 in the world. The job was considered the most highly automated of its kind in the 1960s, involving an astounding volume and variety of equipment, much of it specially designed. Aside from the traditional CAT equipment used on the job, Oman employed several of Buster's innovations including the Quad D9s, the Athey bottom-dumps and the tandem 631 compactor.
BIG Magazine stated that, “if the material for the dam was moved by wheelbarrows, placed end-to-end, they would extend to the moon and back. More than 1.5 million RR cars made the trip from the tailing dump to the dam – enough to circle the globe at the equator, several times. The RR handled more than 300 million gross tons, more than several of the nation’s largest commercial railroads combined.” In other words, Oroville was, and still is, considered one of the construction marvels of the heavy construction industry.



GTC

Is it going to fail or not
still standing?
Originally Posted by hanco
Is it going to fail or not

Yes
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
still standing?


Last reports from CDWR full of glowing confidence .

GTC
So how many illegals does it take to plug a dam hole?
Originally Posted by ironbender
Forecast has about 4" by tuesday.

https://www.wunderground.com/q/zmw:95965.1.99999

I get the upper bunk...
Extremely interesting vid, with a troubling problem that is discussed starting at 4:05

[video:youtube]Z0Ij7cD2C8Y[/video]
OK, how do you get 850 feet of water behind a 770 foot dam?

Some of the other stuff makes sense. Needing a load on generators, clear outflow area. And we don't need to tell every trouble maker where the backup gens are

I suppose the lake is closed to boating right now!
Those are some hell for stout and well designed gear reduction setups, lifting and lowering (on an arc I believe).
Was studying em over on some of the historic photos on That other sight.

Can't see for the life of me what the problem would be, supplying em' with power from big diesel APUs. I'm pretty sure I saw some perched right up there close by, a part of the installation from the get go.

That fella' is indeed a schidt stirrer,...better no news than slanted and panic based guff.

GTC
The water level in reservoirs around here is listed in feet above sea level.

Might be the answer you're looking for.
They just opened the spillway at Don Pedro for the first time in 20 years also. Lake is closed to all boating
Originally Posted by Certifiable
They just opened the spillway at Don Pedro for the first time in 20 years also. Lake is closed to all boating


This video shows a state parks boat getting sucked through the Folsom spillway when the gate there failed....
Originally Posted by sse
Extremely interesting vid, with a troubling problem that is discussed starting at 4:05

[video:youtube]Z0Ij7cD2C8Y[/video]


Very interesting. Thanks for posting.
Originally Posted by hookeye
So how many illegals does it take to plug a dam hole?


Depends entirely on how big you make the damn hole.
Watched some of the new footage posted yesterday and the flow from the spillway sure has made a turn off the rails.

It appears to have cut thru the rocks that were under it as well as those off to the side.

What a mess.
Sad thing is Oroville was a great dam for its time. Proper maintenance and upkeep--it would not be in the news.

They used mining tailings (a ecological mess) and cleaned up a problem.

My family had reunions in the area (a town called Paradise just down the road) for decades.

A great state turned into a dump by self absorbed atheists/socialists/materialists
This one get's real good right around the 12:00 min mark.

[video:youtube]Nrz-U1yxOWM[/video]
I hope Murphy's law doesn't kick in.
BLah blah blah
Has it failed yet
Originally Posted by hanco
Has it failed yet


It was never in danger of failing...now they're burying the truth under tons of rock.
Originally Posted by sse
This one get's real good right around the 12:00 min mark.

[video:youtube]Nrz-U1yxOWM[/video]


That was a very informative video. Thanks.
Basically, it explains my concern and why they have spent the resources on fixing the emergency spillway, which is the Achilles heel. If it goes, the reservoir could drain right past an intact dam, albeit one without online power generation.

Many pages back in this thread, one fellow mentioned his dad concerned about an earthen emergency spillway. Now I understand what was meant.
Is it gonna fail?
© 24hourcampfire