Yes, I've seen those facts numerous times and have been confounded with them. I just do not know who to believe anymore. Is there any way to determine the exact year if I provide my serial number to you?
* Someone is wrong. I forgot to mention that the Winchester historian also made mention: The rifle (1996) could have been fitted with parts from previous years in making the DBM. I did not mention this facet to you, only to see what answers you would provide. I had no intention, none on trying to deceive you. Accordingly, is the Winchester historian correct by stating that Winchester could have used parts from previous years to build a 1996, further adding, "It's not unheard of"? I never in my entire life have heard such things relating to firearms. Your opinion is truly appreciated.
