Originally Posted by jimmyp
The
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
I mostly carry eighteen on board my Glock 17, with no spare on my person (spare is in the glove compartment, and stashed at the house), unless I have reason to think there's an elevated risk level, in which case I stick a spare in my pants pocket. On rare occasions when I carry the Glock 43 instead, then I always carry a spare seven round mag.



P365 is basically equal in size with 13 capability.
Yeah, but it's not a Glock.


I am thankful the P365 does not have a glock trigger and glock's typical accuracy. The P365 shoots rings around any glock I have ever owned, and I don't think the gen 5's are greatly improved, team glock has become team dud. It would be nice but will never happen if they made the p365 in a 40SW, would be a nice hiking pistol. I had a gen3 27 but again typical glock accuracy.



I have benched probably a dozen 40-45 glocks at 50 yards and have better than half would keep five rounds of decent ammo in 4-5 inches. The sorry ones will always stay inside six and the better ones will run with anything this side of a match gun. Both these done at 100 with an old G30SF.

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Glocks are not particularly easy to shoot well but they are mechanically accurate and their barrels are top quality.

I agree with you on the P365, I'd try one in 40 S&W. But the manufacturers are riding the 9mm Wave and it's impossible to compete in a market flooded with cheap, quality police trade-ins that often come with night sights.


Direct Impingement is the Fart Joke of military rifle operating systems. ⓒ