Ok, so we look for asymmetric deals in life, to reap a high reward for taking a low risk, and/or to find great value for a small outlay.
Can we agree that wearing a mask is a low cost, low risk activity that can help slow transmission of a very high risk, and very high cost virus?
Is that an asymmetric deal?
Please discuss.
I gave up on the "we", when "I" have to pay for abortions which:
A. Isnt law, passed by Congress and signed by the Executive
B. Violates my 1st Amendment rights. Religious if it helps one reconnoiter.
Asymmetric deal: Is pretty much summed up in the Constitution, which some choose to either forget or warp. There are no asymmetrical deals, but God given, inalienable rights..
Wear a mask for 80 years. Dont wear one.
The government favoring one over the other is ILLEGAL.
Its odd we have declared freedom of choice decreed from un-Constitutional means, its between us and our doctor, unless its to promote and fund a government system or have mask wearers and their government progeny run scorn on those beyond their jurisdiction.
Socialism and communism is, has been and always be a lie and is always an affront to the only law, the U.S. Constitution.
There is no "asymmetric deal" in the Constitution or Bill of Rights.
Stay inside and hide or mind your own business and leave others as free people to do as they see fit, without being negligent or acting in a pre-meditated fashion.
But my words are wasted.
I literally have nothing in common with close to 50% of the citizens here or those who arent.
If you need to ask "why" I dont agree on the "asymmetrical deal", you are either a commie or too young to make "my" 50%.
You are my enemy and I will do whatever Providence allows me to destroy you....
