The SC hears cases involving Constitutional Violations, not criminal complaints.
Any case involving voter fraud or irregularities must contain a Constitutional argument.
He cheated, they cheated are criminal offenses, not so much Constitutional. Although the argument can be made , but in very slim ground, which usually doesn’t get certiorari.
The PA SC and election officials violated State Constitution, so this has merit, cept Kavanaugh already voted that it didn’t, so this is most likely a done deal.
Other state election fraud law suits will have to contain some form of Constitutional violation, not criminal.
Changing election procedures, in violation of state constitution and us constitution is the only way they will hear it.
Without that, nothing from the corrupt 9.
