Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by 79S
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by 79S
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by Redneck
Originally Posted by OrangeOkie
The SCOTUS is stacked in Trump's favor, and the evidence appears to be overwhelming . . . when all is said and done, SCOTUS will end up saving the Republic, and liberal heads will explode in the process. If Scotus can't fix it, we are doomed as a Republic.
I totally agree...


Originally Posted by logger
Or we could see a 4-4-1 vote with Roberts going with the liberal three and Barrett recusing herself.
No way she recuses.. Vote SHOULD be 9-0 in Trump's favor, but most likely will be 5-4 for Trump with that pos Roberts goin' with the libbies..

What about Kavanaugh?

Didn’t he already vote to allow unconstitutional ballot counting in PA?


And you are ph ucking non googling idiot.. go buy some beef jerky dumb ass..
https://apnews.com/article/election...ections-62bb4957766f436e27ed7de52921aab3


Thanks for the link and thanks for answering my question.

You did notice my post was in the form of a question, yes?


And you could’ve googled it and got your answer. But you took what someone posted on here probably at face value. Never looking it up yourself..


And You could have done The Google and found this:

In the Pennsylvania case, the ruling left in place a decision by the state Supreme Court, based on the state constitution. It extended by three days the period for counting absentee ballots posted by Election Day. Last week the Supreme Court upheld the state court decision by a tie vote, with Chief Justice John Roberts joining the court's three liberals, and later explaining that state courts are free to interpret their own state constitutions in voting cases.

This week the state Republican Party came back to the court seeking a second bite at the apple before Election Day. And this time it failed again, perhaps by a more decisive vote. Only three justices noted their dissent this time — Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. They wanted to hear and decide the question presented by the Republican Party prior to next week's election. The same three dissented in the North Carolina case, too.

Where was Kavanaugh’s vote again?

Notice the question ? mark.


You are never trumper through and through so it’s not surprising you find joy in this. Their were no dissenting judges on 28 October what you pasted it was a statement by the 3 conservatives judges. I’m sure your never trumper thinking will go hah see kavanaugh doesn’t support trump. Again your Google Fu sucks, go ice fishing or something bout the only thing you Minnesotans are good at..

Last edited by 79S; 12/04/20.
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.

Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.