Originally Posted by JoeBob
I hesitate to post this because of the usual suspects will blow a gasket but there is a book coming out that will allege Lincoln owned and sold slaves. It seems that he inherited them through his wife. And instead of setting them free, he eventually sold them.

It’s been hinted at because as someone mentioned n this thread, his wife’s family were the largest slave holders in Kentucky. But there were no records. Literally, no records. Like where there should be records of probate or there might have been records of slave sales, there were pages ripped out of registers or files just missing. So the author of the new book finally figured out (I think by knowing when a certain courthouse burned) that the records had to have been taken sometime in the 1920s. And from that he deduced that the culprit was one of Lincoln’s foremost biographers. And knowing that, he went to the library where the guy’s papers were donated after his death and in a dusty box in the attic found a bunch of records pilfered from various courthouses showing that he owned and sold slaves.


https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...n-owned--and-sold--slaves-301475375.html


No unheard of. The govt of the state of Pennsylvania deliberately burned all the record of indented laborers and other bondsmen & bondswomen to hide their complicity in human trafficking and unwilling bondage.

The govt of hte State of Pennsylvania and the despicable Quakers always made pious noises against slavery of blacks in their domain. But they had no problem with the bondage of whites (mostly poor Irish, Scots, and English) who were indented against their will. Of whom, 90+% died during their indenture up to the year 1700 and abut 50% thereafter.


Regards,

deadlift_dude
“The very first essential for success is a perpetually constant and regular employment of violence.”
----Fred Rogers