I ain’t gettin’ too hung up on the timeline. The preterist view does make sense to me.
This is what Paul taught about the Preterest view. " Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and
overthrow the faith of some."
2Timothy 2:18
He called it profane and vain babblings.
Was Paul referring specifically to the destruction of Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple, which is clearly specifically what I was referring to regarding the preterist view…? Or was Paul referring to something completely different than that…?
Yes, double fulfillment is common in Bible prophecy.
That's not what Preterists believe. They believe that the prophesies of Matthew 24 have already been fully fulfilled. They believe that Jesus arose from the grave, but not bodily.
Preterism teaches that the 7 year tribulation period was from AD 63 to AD 70. Did Jesus return yet? Don't ask a Preterist.
There's a spiritualization of events that are meant to be taken literal. Most christians believe that the temple was destroyed already. That doesn't mean we "have a preterist view."
If antlers is a preterist, fine. People can believe what they want.
I just wouldn't go attend their church.
