Which part of what he said is problematic? That he shot his Glock 23 that many times, or that it's a good thing the part breakage didn't occur during a gun fight? Or both?
I thought the statement that I put into parentheses was making it clear as to the comment in question. But obviously my syntax ain't the best on the block, or even in the room for that matter, as there is a cat in here with me. Sorry for the confusion.
