Home Forums Reloading Big Game Rifles A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.

Print Thread

Hop To

Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later. Tonk #3772191 02/07/10
Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 2,027 3 338Federal Campfire Regular
338Federal Campfire Regular 3 Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 2,027	Tonk, You're leaving alot on the table if your 338-06 is only doing 2650 with 210s and 2950 with 180s. Better whump 'em up some. Factory Fusion 200s have gone as high 2705 from my 338Fed Tikka. Handload 185 TSXs are at 2870 in my Kimber. Even the factory 180AB loads were good for 2740. When I had a 338-06 with 23" bbl my 210 loads were quite a bit above 2700. Just thinking you should still be able to do alot better than you are. You are at 338 Fed levels at the moment, but you are correct in saying the 338-06 SHOULD do better than the 338 Fed

HR IC

Entire Thread
Title	Posted By	Posted
A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Jeffrey	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Mark R Dobrenski	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	muledeer	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	RugerDude	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	GregW	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	muledeer	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Dawn2Dusk	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	himmelrr	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	mathman	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	muledeer	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Mark R Dobrenski	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	muledeer	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	prm	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	blargon	02/13/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	bigsqueeze	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	battue	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	RugerDude	02/04/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	muledeer	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	ringworm	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	bigsqueeze	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Jeffrey	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	tbare	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	prm	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Kentucky_Windage	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	jimmyp	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	338Federal	02/06/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	prm	02/06/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	bigsqueeze	02/07/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Tonk	02/07/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	writing_frog	02/07/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	battue	02/07/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	338Federal	02/08/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Tonk	02/08/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	meddybemps	02/08/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Tonk	02/08/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	jimmyp	02/09/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	muledeer	02/09/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Kentucky_Windage	02/09/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	writing_frog	02/09/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	338Federal	02/11/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	writing_frog	02/06/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	338Federal	02/07/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	bigsqueeze	02/07/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	muledeer	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Reloder28	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	muledeer	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	prm	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	jimmyp	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	coyo	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	muledeer	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Jeffrey	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	mathman	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	65BR	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Kentucky_Windage	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	TimZ	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	VarmintGuy	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Mark R Dobrenski	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	writing_frog	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	temmi	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Jeffrey	02/05/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Jeffrey	02/07/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	scottfromdallas	02/07/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	todbartell	02/13/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	jimmyp	02/13/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	Spotshooter	02/13/10
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	akmtnrunner	07/01/16
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	R_H_Clark	07/01/16
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	scottfromdallas	07/01/16
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	jwall	07/01/16
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	JPro	07/01/16
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	scottfromdallas	07/01/16
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	peaceman	01/11/17
Re: A look at the 338 Federal 3 years later.	JoshK	10/05/21

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

504 members (1OntarioJim, 10gaugemag, 160user, 1Longbow, 1badf350, 17CalFan, 45 invisible), 2,319 guests, and 1,222 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

May
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,194,333

Posts18,526,732

Members74,031

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.108s Queries: 17 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9555 MB (Peak: 0.9807 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-21 12:36:33 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS