There is zero doubt in my mind that there are a lot of
shills posting here; to wit:
Rule 5:
Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as �kooks�, �right-wing�, �liberal�, �left-wing�, �terrorists�, �conspiracy buffs�, �radicals�, �militia�, �racists�, �religious fanatics�, �sexual deviates�, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.[/b]
Rule 7:
Question motives.
Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
The most prominent indicator of shill status are posts that follow scripts as we read here. Notice no one of the them has refuted the gist of the linked article. About the best some posters have been able to muster is defense for propaganda. Truth needs no propaganda. Try going with truth. It will give you 5'ers credibility
