I have yet to read a single refutation of the articles at the links I've posted.
Old (over a year old) meaningless nonsense from a known liberal rag that hates Jews, as does any liberal, such as yourself. But others have posted most of that already but you are too dishonest to acknowledge that, in the pattern of a true liberal.
A true liberal/neocon is an interventionist. A true conservative is a noninterventionist. That makes you a liberal/neocon and me a conservative.
Rule 5:
Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as �kooks�, �right-wing�, �liberal�, �left-wing�, �terrorists�, �conspiracy buffs�, �radicals�, �militia�, �racists�, �religious fanatics�, �sexual deviates�, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
Rule 17:
Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can �argue� with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
You have
Rules for Radical memorized.
Jus' sayin'...
