Why shouldn't the police have been proactive??? They may have had no legal option to do otherwise...
Are you suggesting it would have been illegal for the City Attorney and/or police chief to have notified McCorporate of a potential liability and safety issue on their property?
I never even came close to suggesting such...Why should the city attorney feel the need to contact Micky D's & any issues of liability? More govt. intrusion? Did you change your sig line yet?
Oh well, so much for protect and serve. Just seemed like a logical thing for the powers that be to try and be pro-active. Like I said, I'm naive.
Sending a correspondence informing McCorporate of a potential liability is a language McD's would understand, and would likely have given them pause, if not completely ended this "event center" altogether. By foisting the burden back on them, they know they'll be more liable than ever for having known and done nothing to mitigate. Again, just my naivety.
Just let the apes run loose till somebody dies, then
The police and the welfare subsidized thugs were both being proactive and they both do protect and serve their own class, the Government Class. The police document but do not disrupt the chronic violence of the welfare subsidized thugs. The thugs punctuate their chronic low level violence with this atrocity to shock and frighten private citizens. The police spokespersons tell the frightened private citizens of the documented history of crimes and the atrocity and that there will be more unless they pay for more and better paid police and concede to more infringements on personal liberty. The 'Community' spokespersons tell the frightened private citizens of the documented history of crimes and the atrocity and that there will be more unless they pay for more and better paid social programs and concede to more infringements on personal liberty.
The police and the thugs and their entire Government Class grows, profits, and gets more powerful.
Private citizens pay in blood, treasure, and liberty.
