Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye

Medical professionals are psychologically predisposed against drawing the conclusion that serious medical conditions might be associated with a treatment that they've personally recommended in the past to patients as safe.


Hawk, this is COMPLETE AND UTTER BULLSHIT!!!

You have yet to come up with any credible reports/studies/reviews that support your assertions... everything you've EVER cited is personal experience and the occasional piece of junk science from one of the pseudo-science websites you favor.

There is a huge body of credible peer-reviewed evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of vaccines which you are of course completely unable to refute, so you put up a BULLSHIT post like this one. Again.

Aside from a few bad apples here and there, doctors are NOT invested in specific treatments in any real way. For example, we recommended estrogen replacement for menopausal women for years, until the WHI and Nurses Study came out showing links between estrogen supplements and certain cancers, heart disease, and stroke. Most doctors immediately about-faced and stopped prescribing HRT. (As it happens, the WHI and Nurses' Study were both wrong, and both have recanted their previous findings, but you don't read that on the Front Page... after all, any cub reporter knows that if it doesn't bleed, it doesn't lead...)


"I'm gonna have to science the schit out of this." Mark Watney, Sol 59, Mars