Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
There is no question that energy is required. Without energy transfer, nothing happens.

Yes but we're talking about bullets killing animals, not the laws of physics writ large. There is no question about whether any bullet not at rest has "energy."
Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Even with massive energy transfer, if it happens over a large enough area or time span, nothing interesting happens.
Those two facts should lead one to the more interesting questions and useful answers.

Once again, bullets and animals. Bullets impart their energy in a small area over milliseconds.

The question is, in that context is "kinetic energy" a good yardstick.

And the answer is no.


I added back in the line from my post that you left out of your quote.

Your response tell me the "more interesting questions" have totally eluded you.


Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.

A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.