Trout out? You believe our courts are interested in truth? Try again. DNA is information . Technical specific design information in the form of complex code. All life deep depends on it and no materialist (such as yourself) can account for this information by random accident.
In addition Falk is a confessed Christian who believes in theistic evolution. As an atheist you stand with him?
DNA is not a code. It's a chemical process. It's a copy paste process that makes the occasional error, and there are sorted according to their continued likely hood to be passed from generation to generation in a process Darwin called "evolution by natural selection".
As for DNA being a "code", I know many code writers, and in every instance the author of the code is way more complex than the code. If DNA is so complex it requires an intelligent designer, than by extension, the more complex creator would fall under those same conditions. To claim other wise would be a case of special pleading.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
