"Glock has engaged I some shady business practices".
As a gun company, or the family?
This seems to have somewhat become Glock vs Smith & Wesson.
I wish I had half the money Smith has paid Glock over the years.
Liable, and patent infringement are shady, and expensive.
Smith first lied about Glock in ads, saying "plastic pistols" were dangerous.
Then, they copied the same designs. Badly!
I agree on Glock gertting fat and lazy. It's way too common.
A young hungry entrepreneurial engineer busts his else to meet a need.
Then too make his product successful.
The money rolls in, and his competitors imitate his innovation.
But now, Smith was hungry, and Glock was lazy.
Others improved the basic Glock, and sell it to consumers cheaper.
