Myself I don't see where the 'lazy' comments are coming from.
Seems to me Glock has remained innovative with generational changes, longer slides, shorter slides, longer grips, shorter grips, slim grips, slim slides, single stackers, 380s, MOS versions, ports, etc, etc.
Easy.
The biggest legitimate complaints for years were grip size, angle, sights.
They really refused to do anything about that.
Perfection, you will buy what we want you to.
Other companies, designing new guns, jumped right on those issues.
Interchangeable panels for sides front, and rear.
Glock only responded when they saw market share dropping.
Sights? They still sell their gun at higher tier prices, and most will drop
A Benjamin on sights.
Others are underpricing them, with good sights.
You mention innovation.
The 17 was man on the moon innovation,
The 43, and the slimmer 19, people have been wanting that for years.
Glock responded, after their competition was selling a similar gun, for a couple years.
The 30s. Holy crap, that was easy to see and do.
Why didn't it shortly follow the 36.
Not immediately of course.
You want the me first guys to buy one, than the other.
But a year later, would have been smart.
