The following is not suggesting that SandBilly’s angst isn’t misplaced in this thread, but there’s a sizable industry in Texas depicting hunting as an ala carte affair, both ‘high’ and ‘low’ fence. There’s a culture there that seems to recognize game as belonging to the landowner. There’s at least a strong implication in practice. Any implication that game belongs to the landowner radically deviates from much of the rest of the country, where game laws were largely shaped as reaction to pre-revolution colonialism. Wild game was no longer to be the exclusive domain of the crown and would belong to the people.
Originally Posted by 16penny
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty
