Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by kingston
If he wasn't doing this stuff for profit, I'd say give the guy a break. Nugent is a professional and plays the high profile TV super star game. The standard should be higher, the highest, really. It's not like Alaska passed the law the day before and he was already in the woods. It's not enough to claim it as an innocent mistake/oversight, not when you're representing an industry at that level. It shouldn't go without mention that Nugent's actions reflect on the rest of us hunters who are not an industry—on all of us who hunt for our own reasons.

I’ll disagree, Brian.

The regs should apply equally (ir)regardless of who is affected. Nice should be no different than a resident.

The ironic part I posted above.



I'm not arguing the regulations shouldn't apply to everyone equally. I'm arguing as to whether Nugent should be shown leniency in punishment, as he seems to argue in the video. Nugent also seems to blame the regulations for his predicament. The stakes are higher for Nugent, because the stakes are higher for Nugent. He shouldn't get a pass because the stakes are higher.


Originally Posted by 16penny
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty