I already linked the LDS-church owned Deseret News article that reads, "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has agreed to pay $250 million..." I did not make the claim that you accuse me of only "intimating," that the LDS church openly supported pederasty. They're paying acknowledges complicity in the pederasty through their sponsorship. The Methodist Church (UMC) has not yet agreed to pay, but there is a lot of evidence they've been subverted by sexual immorality and I won't be surprised if they also acknowledge complicity.
You pathetic wretch, read the title of your post. You said that Mormons sponsored pederasty!
Yes, and then I repeated the claim again in the post you quoted, "Their paying acknowledges complicity in the pederasty through their sponsorship." I reiterate it a third time: The LDS church agreed to pay $250M in an acknowledgement that it sponsored the sexual abuse of boys. This payment isn't charity to the victims. The victim representatives are demanding far more money from the LDS church and one of their representatives is quoted, "[the LDS church] is offering a paltry $250 million to compensate the thousands of abuse survivors who were abused in Mormon Boy Scout troops by Mormon Scout leaders.” If the LDS church did not agree with this, then why did it agree to the tune of $250M? It knows it has a liability because it did do it.
